RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      淸의 對朝鮮 영사 파견에 관한 연구 = Qing Dynasty's Sending Consuls to Joseon Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82431440

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Traditional Korea-China relation, the consul system couldn't work. Because a main agent of a trade were not individuals but states in East Asia. There was therefore no need to protect their own overseas merchants. That was logically unnecessary.
      With the Imm-oh Military Revolt(1882), however, the relation between the two countries became to change. Immediately after the military revolt, the two countries contracted Regulations For Maritime And Overland Trade between Chinese And Korean Subjects(1882). The regulations required the exchanges of the Commercial Government Agents. Here, the agents were a substantial consul. Because, the main responsibility of the agents was to protect their nationals in the trading partner. By the way, the relation between the twos was severed with the First Sino-Japanese War(1894). Because of that, Chinese merchants in Korea(Joseon) were in unexpected hardship. After the year 1894, therefore, the British Consul in Korea was commissioned to protect Chinese merchants. It was a incomplete condition.
      To solve such a condition, Qing Dynasty send the non-governmental Superintendent to Korea. The responsibility of the Superintendent was also similar to the that of the Commercial Government Agent.
      In the consular relation between the two countries, the year 1896 was a important year. Because, in that year, China send the first consul to Korea. The consul was Tang Shaoyi. But it was a one-sided dispatch. Korea didn't send consuls to China.
      The year that the consular relation was institutionalize was 1899. In that year, the twos contracted the Treaty Of Friendship And Commerce Between China And Korea. Article 2 of the treaty required the exchanges of the consuls. With this, the consular relation between the twos entered a period of a institutionalization. However, the Korean Government still didn't dispatch consuls. Only the Chinese Government dispatched consuls.
      Afterward, the consular relation suffered so many complications. That relation was linked to fate of the twos. In the year 1905, the Korean Government lost the diplomatic power, and it caused change of the authority over the Chinese consuls in Korea. With the year 1905, the Chinese Minister to Japan began to superintend the Chinese consuls in Korea. And 1910 was also a important year. With the fall of Joseon Dynasty, the Treaty Of Friendship And Commerce Between China And Korea lost effect. As a substitute, the treaty between China and Japan became the legal basis of the consular relations.
      번역하기

      In Traditional Korea-China relation, the consul system couldn't work. Because a main agent of a trade were not individuals but states in East Asia. There was therefore no need to protect their own overseas merchants. That was logically unnecessary. W...

      In Traditional Korea-China relation, the consul system couldn't work. Because a main agent of a trade were not individuals but states in East Asia. There was therefore no need to protect their own overseas merchants. That was logically unnecessary.
      With the Imm-oh Military Revolt(1882), however, the relation between the two countries became to change. Immediately after the military revolt, the two countries contracted Regulations For Maritime And Overland Trade between Chinese And Korean Subjects(1882). The regulations required the exchanges of the Commercial Government Agents. Here, the agents were a substantial consul. Because, the main responsibility of the agents was to protect their nationals in the trading partner. By the way, the relation between the twos was severed with the First Sino-Japanese War(1894). Because of that, Chinese merchants in Korea(Joseon) were in unexpected hardship. After the year 1894, therefore, the British Consul in Korea was commissioned to protect Chinese merchants. It was a incomplete condition.
      To solve such a condition, Qing Dynasty send the non-governmental Superintendent to Korea. The responsibility of the Superintendent was also similar to the that of the Commercial Government Agent.
      In the consular relation between the two countries, the year 1896 was a important year. Because, in that year, China send the first consul to Korea. The consul was Tang Shaoyi. But it was a one-sided dispatch. Korea didn't send consuls to China.
      The year that the consular relation was institutionalize was 1899. In that year, the twos contracted the Treaty Of Friendship And Commerce Between China And Korea. Article 2 of the treaty required the exchanges of the consuls. With this, the consular relation between the twos entered a period of a institutionalization. However, the Korean Government still didn't dispatch consuls. Only the Chinese Government dispatched consuls.
      Afterward, the consular relation suffered so many complications. That relation was linked to fate of the twos. In the year 1905, the Korean Government lost the diplomatic power, and it caused change of the authority over the Chinese consuls in Korea. With the year 1905, the Chinese Minister to Japan began to superintend the Chinese consuls in Korea. And 1910 was also a important year. With the fall of Joseon Dynasty, the Treaty Of Friendship And Commerce Between China And Korea lost effect. As a substitute, the treaty between China and Japan became the legal basis of the consular relations.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅰ. 청일전쟁 이후 조선총영사의 파견
      • Ⅱ. 한청통상조약과 영사관계의 제도화
      • Ⅲ. 한 · 청 멸망과정과 영사관계의 문제
      • 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅰ. 청일전쟁 이후 조선총영사의 파견
      • Ⅱ. 한청통상조약과 영사관계의 제도화
      • Ⅲ. 한 · 청 멸망과정과 영사관계의 문제
      • 맺음말
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "論臺灣, 「譯書函稿 권2. in: 李鴻章全集" 1874

      2 "독립신문 광무 3년"

      3 "高宗實錄 光武 4년 8월 8일"

      4 국사편찬위원회, "駐韓日本公使館記錄, 前京城駐在 淸國總領事 唐紹儀 來仁 件"

      5 李鴻章, "電稿 권16. in: 李文忠公全集 6" 文海出版社 286-, 1965

      6 국회도서관 입법조사국, "舊韓末條約彙纂 상권" 1964

      7 "統署日記 三" 高麗大學校 出版部 1972

      8 道光朝, "籌辦夷務始末 권4" 15-,

      9 張志淵, "社說 하. in: 韋庵文庫 권10" 국사편찬위원회 1956

      10 箱田惠子, "淸末領事派遣論-1860, 1870年代を中心に-" 東洋史硏究會 60 (60): 2002

      1 "論臺灣, 「譯書函稿 권2. in: 李鴻章全集" 1874

      2 "독립신문 광무 3년"

      3 "高宗實錄 光武 4년 8월 8일"

      4 국사편찬위원회, "駐韓日本公使館記錄, 前京城駐在 淸國總領事 唐紹儀 來仁 件"

      5 李鴻章, "電稿 권16. in: 李文忠公全集 6" 文海出版社 286-, 1965

      6 국회도서관 입법조사국, "舊韓末條約彙纂 상권" 1964

      7 "統署日記 三" 高麗大學校 出版部 1972

      8 道光朝, "籌辦夷務始末 권4" 15-,

      9 張志淵, "社說 하. in: 韋庵文庫 권10" 국사편찬위원회 1956

      10 箱田惠子, "淸末領事派遣論-1860, 1870年代を中心に-" 東洋史硏究會 60 (60): 2002

      11 佐佐木揚, "淸末中國における日本觀と西洋觀" 東京大學出版會 2000

      12 田濤, "淸朝條約全集, 哈爾濱" 黑龍江省人民出版社 1999

      13 片岡一忠, "淸朝新疆統治硏究" 雄山閣 1991

      14 權錫奉, "淸日戰爭 이후의 韓淸關係 硏究(1894-1898). in: 淸日戰爭을 前後한 韓國과 列强" 韓國精神文化硏究院 1984

      15 劉石吉, "淸季海防與塞防之爭的硏究" 2 (2): 1971

      16 中央硏究員 近代史硏究所, "淸季中日韓關係史料" 中央硏究院 近代史硏究所 1972

      17 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸季中外使領年表" 中華書局 1985

      18 "淸史稿 권119. in: 職官6" 出使大臣

      19 "日省錄 光武 4년 7월 14일"

      20 "承政院日記 光武 4년 7월 14일"

      21 "官報 光武 4년 8월 11일"

      22 高麗大學校 亞細亞問題硏究所, "外衙門日記" 1974

      23 李丙朝, "國際法新講" 一潮閣 300-, 1996

      24 郭延以, "中華民國史事日誌" 中央硏究院 近代史硏究所

      25 "中外舊約章大全 上冊" 中國海關出版社 70-, 2004

      26 "中國近代外交制度史" 甘肅人民出版社 1991

      27 "中國外交行政" 臺灣商務印書館 1945

      28 I. Hsü, "The Great Policy Debate in China, 1874: Maritime Defence vs Frontier Defence" 25 : 1965

      29 "Coolies and Mandarins: China's Protection of Overseas Chinese during the Late Ch'ing Period(1851-1911)" Singapore Univ. Press 1985

      30 "China's Entrance into the Family of Nations: The Diplomatic Phase 1858-1880" Harvard Univ. Press 1960

      31 Larisa V. Zabrovskaia, "1899 Treaty And It’s Impact On The Development Of The Chinese-Korean Trade(1895-1905). in: 何石金昌洙敎授華甲紀念史學論叢" 범우사 1992

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.64 1.64 1.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.99 0.87 2.008 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼