RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Human Dignity and the Ethics of Human Enhancement

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100401143

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Human dignity supports the equal value of all humans and their ethical treatment. While human rights conventions use the term frequently, it is rarely defined. The term dignity is used differently, and two dimensions are described in detail. Inherent ...

      Human dignity supports the equal value of all humans and their ethical treatment. While human rights conventions use the term frequently, it is rarely defined. The term dignity is used differently, and two dimensions are described in detail. Inherent dignity is an intrinsic dimension held by all humans and is the basis of equal rights for all humans. Circumstantial dignity is another dimension, but is variable and changeable. This is in mind when circumstances are said to enhance or diminish someone’s dignity. The recent critique of dignity arises in part because of conflation of these two dimensions. Others reject dignity because of its religious connections. Such criticisms will be responded to in defense of dignity.
      Posthuman and transhuman enhancement also raise questions about the value of dignity because of its roots in humanism. Nick Bostrom defends posthuman dignity while critiquing Leon Kass’s bioconservative position. Bostrom’s argument will be critiqued because of his failure to distinguish between inherent and circumstantial dignity, and his misunderstanding of Kass’s claims.
      In contrast to the transhumanist enhancement project, inherent dignity points to the givenness and limitations of human nature. This indicates the importance of developing gratitude for human nature and avoiding an endless pursuit of perfection. Such an approach is not antagonistic to medicine and science. Instead, it places priority on improving the circumstantial dignity of all human beings, especially those who live without their basic needs being met. Their inherent dignity places a moral obligation on those with resources to help them. Medicine and science should focus on relieving their needs, not enhancing those who already have most needs met. Justice for all humans based on their inherent dignity is proposed as a significant argument against the ethics of transhuman enhancement.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. Introduction
      • II. Dignity’s Dimensions
      • III. Recent Critique of Human Dignity
      • 1) Lack of Clarity
      • 2) Religious Objection
      • I. Introduction
      • II. Dignity’s Dimensions
      • III. Recent Critique of Human Dignity
      • 1) Lack of Clarity
      • 2) Religious Objection
      • 3) Posthuman Critique
      • IV. Posthumanism and Transhumanism
      • 1) Posthuman Dignity
      • V. Critics of Transhuman Enhancement
      • 1) Bostrom’s Response to Fear of Loss of Dignity
      • 2) Bostrom’s Response to Fear of Discrimination
      • V. Conclusion
      • Works Cited
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Wolfe, Cary, "What is Posthumanism" University of Minnesota Press

      2 UNESCO, "Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights"

      3 United Nations, "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"

      4 Bostrom, Nick, "Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing" Ria University Press 339-371, 2004

      5 Cheshire, William, "Toward a Common Language of Human Dignity" 18 (18): 7-10, 2002

      6 Habermas, Jürgen, "Time of Transitions" Polity 2006

      7 Pinker, Steven, "The Stupidity of Dignity"

      8 O’Mathúna, Dónal P., "The Place of Dignity in Everyday Ethics" 28 (28): 12-18, 2011

      9 Lee, Patrick, "The Nature and Basis of Human Dignity" 21 (21): 173-193, 2008

      10 Hawthorne, Nathaniel, "The Birth-Mark, In President’s Council on Bioethics" President’s Council on Bioethics

      1 Wolfe, Cary, "What is Posthumanism" University of Minnesota Press

      2 UNESCO, "Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights"

      3 United Nations, "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"

      4 Bostrom, Nick, "Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing" Ria University Press 339-371, 2004

      5 Cheshire, William, "Toward a Common Language of Human Dignity" 18 (18): 7-10, 2002

      6 Habermas, Jürgen, "Time of Transitions" Polity 2006

      7 Pinker, Steven, "The Stupidity of Dignity"

      8 O’Mathúna, Dónal P., "The Place of Dignity in Everyday Ethics" 28 (28): 12-18, 2011

      9 Lee, Patrick, "The Nature and Basis of Human Dignity" 21 (21): 173-193, 2008

      10 Hawthorne, Nathaniel, "The Birth-Mark, In President’s Council on Bioethics" President’s Council on Bioethics

      11 O’Mathúna, Dónal P, "Taking a Precautionary Approach to Nanotechnology" 1 (1): 26-30, 2011

      12 Annas, George J., "Science Fiction and Philosophy:From Time Travel to Superintelligence" Wiley-Blackwell 227-240, 2009

      13 Horton, Richard, "Rediscovering Human Dignity" 364 : 1081-1085, 2004

      14 Sulmasy, Daniel P, "Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation" Springer 9-18, 2007

      15 Lewis, Milton, "Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation" Springer 93-105, 2007

      16 Bostrom, Nick, "New Waves in Applied Ethics" Palgrave Macmillan 120-152, 2007

      17 Meilaender, Gilbert, "Neither Beast nor God: The Dignity of the Human Person" Encounter Books 2009

      18 O’Mathúna, Dónal P., "Nanoethics: Big Ethical Issues with Small Technology" Continuum Press 2009

      19 Bostrom, Nick, "Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity" Springer 107-136, 2008

      20 United Nations, "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights"

      21 United Nations, "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant"

      22 Warwick, Kevin, "In the Mind of the Machine"

      23 Bostrom, Nick, "In Defense of Human Dignity" 19 (19): 202-214, 2005

      24 Seidel, Asher, "Immortal Passage: Philosophical Speculations on Posthuman Evolution" Rowman & Littlefield 2010

      25 Kateb, George, "Human Dignity" Harvard University Press 2011

      26 "Global Health Workforce Alliance. Adding Value to Health"

      27 Pico della Mirandola, "Giovanni. Oration on the Dignity of Man"

      28 Beckwith, Francis J, "Dignity Never Been Photographed: Scientific Materialism, Enlightenment Liberalism, and Steven Pinker" 26 (26): 93-110, 2010

      29 Macklin, Ruth, "Dignity Is a Useless Concept" 327 : 1419-1420, 2003

      30 Zylinska, Joanna, "Bioethics in the Age of New Media" MIT Press 2009

      31 Kass, Leon, "Ageless Bodies, Happy Souls: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Perfection" 1 : 9-28, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : Trans-Humanities -> 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2009-06-11 학회명변경 영문명 : Ewha Institute for Humanities: EIH -> Ewha Institute for the Humanities: EIH
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼