RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

      K-IFRS 시행에 따른 경영자와 감사인간의 의견불일치와 감사의견에 관한 연구 = Research Articles : A Study on Manager and Auditor Disagreement and Audit Opinion by Enforcing K-IFRS

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99663433

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      IFRS have been mandatorily adopted to Korean listed firms since 2011. The financial experts` decisions such as auditors affect the financial statements under IFRS more than under K-GAAP because IFRS are the principle-based accounting standards and K-GAAP are the rule-based accounting standards, so that manager and auditor disagreement is expected to increase after enforcing K-IFRS. This study investigates whether the difference of manager and auditor disagreement exists between the pre and the post enforcement of K-IFRS and manager and auditor disagreement affects audit opinion significantly after enforcing K-IFRS. I document that there is the significant difference of manager and auditor disagreement between the pre and the post enforcement of K-IFRS. Moreover, I find that both of the amount and the frequency of manager and auditor disagreement increase after enforcing K-IFRS. Therefore, auditors performed audit works aggressively and conflicted with managers` assertion frequently in process of reporting and disclosing the financial statements after enforcing K-IFRS. Besides, most of the disagreement firms are KOSDAQ firms which did not sufficiently prepare to adopt K-IFRS. So, it seems that auditors performed as assistants to settle K-IFRS in the unprepared firms such as KOSDAQ firms gradually. However, I document that the increase of the disagreement between manager and auditor after enforcing K-IFRS does not affect the modification of audit opinion significantly. Also, I find that the firms with the disagreement between manager and auditor disclosed the qualified audit opinion after enforcing K-IFRS less than before enforcing K-IFRS. Through the additional analysis using de-mean processing to exclude the fixed effect by year and using only KOSDAQ firms which have most of disagreement samples, the results from de-mean processing and KOSDAQ firms are similar to those of this study. Second, I document that DA of the unqualified audit opinion firms is higher than that of the qualified audit opinion firms out of the disagreement samples, which means that auditors do not materially consider the discretionary earnings` management as they modify audit opinion of firms with the disagreement between manager and auditor. Third, I analyse the earnings distribution to find whether the difference of the distribution asymmetry between the preliminary and the reported earnings exists, and I confirm that the distribution of the reported earnings are mitigated as compared with that of the preliminary earnings. Finally, I analyse which financial factors affect the disagreement between manager and auditor, and audit opinion after enforcing K-IFRS, and I confirm that intangible assets, loan receivables, short-term borrowings, deferred tax liabilities, and longterm debts affect the disagreement between manager and auditor, and short-term borrowings and deferred tax liabilities affect the modification of audit opinion. This study investigates the change of manager and auditor disagreement and audit opinion after enforcing K-IFRS and the results of this study provide some implications. First, auditors performed audit works aggressively after enforcing K-IFRS. They constrain managers` income increasing earnings management after enforcing K-IFRS and perform as assistants to settle K-IFRS in the unprepared firms such as KOSDAQ firms. Second, the discretionary earnings` management is expected to increase under the principle-based accounting standards as compared with the rule-based accounting standards because auditors do not materially consider the discretionary earnings` management as they modify audit opinion of firms which have the disagreement between manager and auditor. Even though this study provides various implications mentioned above, it has some limitations. First, it is possible that the results of this study are biased toward the characteristics of firms which disclose the preliminary financial reports in accordance with the regulation of ``timely disclosure``. Firms are required to disclose the preliminary financial reports when they face the material change in the current net income as compared to the prior net income. Second, it analyses with the samples of FY 2011 only when K-IFRS was mandatorily enforced. For the reason, it is necessary to carefully use or apply the results of this study and it is worthwhile to study with the additional samples in the future.
      번역하기

      IFRS have been mandatorily adopted to Korean listed firms since 2011. The financial experts` decisions such as auditors affect the financial statements under IFRS more than under K-GAAP because IFRS are the principle-based accounting standards and K-G...

      IFRS have been mandatorily adopted to Korean listed firms since 2011. The financial experts` decisions such as auditors affect the financial statements under IFRS more than under K-GAAP because IFRS are the principle-based accounting standards and K-GAAP are the rule-based accounting standards, so that manager and auditor disagreement is expected to increase after enforcing K-IFRS. This study investigates whether the difference of manager and auditor disagreement exists between the pre and the post enforcement of K-IFRS and manager and auditor disagreement affects audit opinion significantly after enforcing K-IFRS. I document that there is the significant difference of manager and auditor disagreement between the pre and the post enforcement of K-IFRS. Moreover, I find that both of the amount and the frequency of manager and auditor disagreement increase after enforcing K-IFRS. Therefore, auditors performed audit works aggressively and conflicted with managers` assertion frequently in process of reporting and disclosing the financial statements after enforcing K-IFRS. Besides, most of the disagreement firms are KOSDAQ firms which did not sufficiently prepare to adopt K-IFRS. So, it seems that auditors performed as assistants to settle K-IFRS in the unprepared firms such as KOSDAQ firms gradually. However, I document that the increase of the disagreement between manager and auditor after enforcing K-IFRS does not affect the modification of audit opinion significantly. Also, I find that the firms with the disagreement between manager and auditor disclosed the qualified audit opinion after enforcing K-IFRS less than before enforcing K-IFRS. Through the additional analysis using de-mean processing to exclude the fixed effect by year and using only KOSDAQ firms which have most of disagreement samples, the results from de-mean processing and KOSDAQ firms are similar to those of this study. Second, I document that DA of the unqualified audit opinion firms is higher than that of the qualified audit opinion firms out of the disagreement samples, which means that auditors do not materially consider the discretionary earnings` management as they modify audit opinion of firms with the disagreement between manager and auditor. Third, I analyse the earnings distribution to find whether the difference of the distribution asymmetry between the preliminary and the reported earnings exists, and I confirm that the distribution of the reported earnings are mitigated as compared with that of the preliminary earnings. Finally, I analyse which financial factors affect the disagreement between manager and auditor, and audit opinion after enforcing K-IFRS, and I confirm that intangible assets, loan receivables, short-term borrowings, deferred tax liabilities, and longterm debts affect the disagreement between manager and auditor, and short-term borrowings and deferred tax liabilities affect the modification of audit opinion. This study investigates the change of manager and auditor disagreement and audit opinion after enforcing K-IFRS and the results of this study provide some implications. First, auditors performed audit works aggressively after enforcing K-IFRS. They constrain managers` income increasing earnings management after enforcing K-IFRS and perform as assistants to settle K-IFRS in the unprepared firms such as KOSDAQ firms. Second, the discretionary earnings` management is expected to increase under the principle-based accounting standards as compared with the rule-based accounting standards because auditors do not materially consider the discretionary earnings` management as they modify audit opinion of firms which have the disagreement between manager and auditor. Even though this study provides various implications mentioned above, it has some limitations. First, it is possible that the results of this study are biased toward the characteristics of firms which disclose the preliminary financial reports in accordance with the regulation of ``timely disclosure``. Firms are required to disclose the preliminary financial reports when they face the material change in the current net income as compared to the prior net income. Second, it analyses with the samples of FY 2011 only when K-IFRS was mandatorily enforced. For the reason, it is necessary to carefully use or apply the results of this study and it is worthwhile to study with the additional samples in the future.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 송인만, "적자보고를 회피하기 위한 이익조정" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 29-52, 2004

      2 나종길, "이익조정에 대한 비적정의견성향과 감사품빌" 한국회계학회 26 (26): 51-89, 2001

      3 박수근, "연결실체내 감사인의 일치성이 연결재무제표 감사품질에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정보학회 28 (28): 175-197, 2010

      4 김용식, "국제회계기준 도입 계획이 감사인 선임과 감사품질에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정보학회 30 (30): 147-173, 2012

      5 이동헌, "공시유형별 가결산이익의 정확성 및 정정공시" 한국경영학회 40 (40): 721-751, 2011

      6 손성규, "경영자-감사인간의 의견불일치와 감사인교체" 한국공인회계사회 (48) : 205-229, 2008

      7 박종일, "감사인 교체와 감사품질" 한국공인회계사회 (46) : 191-226, 2007

      8 전영순, "가결산 순이익의 과대공시와 기업특성 및 시장의 사후 감시기능" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 79-105, 2005

      9 Stokes, D., "The Value of High Quality Auditing in Enforcing and Implementing IFRS: The Case of Goodwill Impairment" Monash University 2009

      10 Yeo, E. J., "The Market Reaction and Analyst Response on Corrective Disclosure of Preliminary Annual Earnings Announcements" Yon-Sei University 2005

      1 송인만, "적자보고를 회피하기 위한 이익조정" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 29-52, 2004

      2 나종길, "이익조정에 대한 비적정의견성향과 감사품빌" 한국회계학회 26 (26): 51-89, 2001

      3 박수근, "연결실체내 감사인의 일치성이 연결재무제표 감사품질에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정보학회 28 (28): 175-197, 2010

      4 김용식, "국제회계기준 도입 계획이 감사인 선임과 감사품질에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정보학회 30 (30): 147-173, 2012

      5 이동헌, "공시유형별 가결산이익의 정확성 및 정정공시" 한국경영학회 40 (40): 721-751, 2011

      6 손성규, "경영자-감사인간의 의견불일치와 감사인교체" 한국공인회계사회 (48) : 205-229, 2008

      7 박종일, "감사인 교체와 감사품질" 한국공인회계사회 (46) : 191-226, 2007

      8 전영순, "가결산 순이익의 과대공시와 기업특성 및 시장의 사후 감시기능" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 79-105, 2005

      9 Stokes, D., "The Value of High Quality Auditing in Enforcing and Implementing IFRS: The Case of Goodwill Impairment" Monash University 2009

      10 Yeo, E. J., "The Market Reaction and Analyst Response on Corrective Disclosure of Preliminary Annual Earnings Announcements" Yon-Sei University 2005

      11 Chow, C., "Qualified Audit and Auditor Switching" 57 : 326-335, 1982

      12 Kothari, S., "Performance matched discretionary accrual measures" 39 : 163-197, 2005

      13 Armstrong, C., "Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe" 2009

      14 김용식, "K-IFRS 조기도입 유인과 성과 분석" 한국회계학회 19 (19): 89-115, 2010

      15 Barth, M., "International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality" 46 : 467-498, 2008

      16 Godfrey, J., "Goodwill Impairment As a Reflection of Investment Opportunities" 49 : 117-140, 2009

      17 Louwers, T., "Going-Concern Opinion and Auditor's Loss Function" 36 (36): 143-156, 1998

      18 DeFond, M., "Factors Related to Auditor-Client Disagreement over Income Increasing Accounting Method" 9 : 415-431, 1993

      19 Burgstahler, D., "Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses" 24 : 99-126, 1997

      20 Chalmers, K., "Does a Goodwill Impairment Regime Better Reflect the Underlying Economic Attributes of Goodwill?" 51 : 634-660, 2011

      21 Jeanjean, T., "Do Accounting Standards Matter? An Exploratory Analysis of Earnings Management Before and After IFRS Adoption" 27 : 480-494, 2008

      22 Smith, D., "Auditor 'Subject to' Opinions, Disclaimers and Auditor Changes" 6 (6): 95-108, 1986

      23 Marden, R. E., "Audit Risk and IFRS" 79 : 32-36, 2009

      24 Kida, T., "An Investigation into Auditor's Continuity and Related Qualification Judgements" 18 : 506-523, 1980

      25 Francis, J., "Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism" 16 : 135-165, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼