RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      응집성과 문단: 틀 의미론(frame semantics)에 기초한 마가복음 1:16-20 연구 = Cohesion and Paragraph: The Study of Mark 1:16-20 in terms of Frame Semantics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82566204

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The present study is to demonstrate in the light of frame semantics of cognitive linguistics how as an oral-aural narrative the Gospel of Mark may be communicated in a cohesive way between speakers and audience In particular, the study is focused on Mk 1:16-20 which consists of two ``calling stories.`` the reason I choose the paragraph for the present study is because of the belief that Mark`s oral-aural narrative is intended to be communicated basically on the basis of paragraph or episode, a discourse unit. It has been known that the cohesion of a paragraph is made by narrative information(e. g. place, event and characters[that is, paragraph boundary markers]), by lexical information(collocation) and by grammatical items (conjunction, article, and pronoun and so on). Making use of frame semantics of cognitive linguistics, however, I will show that the cohesion of the paragraph is made possible by frame-based story processing; and information such as narrative elements, lexical items and grammatical indicators plays an role of evoking frame so that the episode information may be processed in cohesive way. It is, of course, not easy to choose an appropriate method which may lead us to a better understanding of such an ancient text as the Gospel of Mark. Nonetheless, since cognitive linguistics have shown the importance of human cognitive processing in understanding the coherence of information within episode or paragraph, the present study hopes to demonstrate that frame semantics is a linguistic theory to show how the original meaning of Mark`s Gospel may be communicated and understood in terms of paragraphs.
      번역하기

      The present study is to demonstrate in the light of frame semantics of cognitive linguistics how as an oral-aural narrative the Gospel of Mark may be communicated in a cohesive way between speakers and audience In particular, the study is focused on M...

      The present study is to demonstrate in the light of frame semantics of cognitive linguistics how as an oral-aural narrative the Gospel of Mark may be communicated in a cohesive way between speakers and audience In particular, the study is focused on Mk 1:16-20 which consists of two ``calling stories.`` the reason I choose the paragraph for the present study is because of the belief that Mark`s oral-aural narrative is intended to be communicated basically on the basis of paragraph or episode, a discourse unit. It has been known that the cohesion of a paragraph is made by narrative information(e. g. place, event and characters[that is, paragraph boundary markers]), by lexical information(collocation) and by grammatical items (conjunction, article, and pronoun and so on). Making use of frame semantics of cognitive linguistics, however, I will show that the cohesion of the paragraph is made possible by frame-based story processing; and information such as narrative elements, lexical items and grammatical indicators plays an role of evoking frame so that the episode information may be processed in cohesive way. It is, of course, not easy to choose an appropriate method which may lead us to a better understanding of such an ancient text as the Gospel of Mark. Nonetheless, since cognitive linguistics have shown the importance of human cognitive processing in understanding the coherence of information within episode or paragraph, the present study hopes to demonstrate that frame semantics is a linguistic theory to show how the original meaning of Mark`s Gospel may be communicated and understood in terms of paragraphs.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 R. A. de 보그란드, "언어학 입문" 한신문화사 1995

      2 박윤만, "신약 성서 본문의 문맥에 대한 인지 언어학적 고찰" 한국신학정보연구원 3 (3): 241-274, 2009

      3 박윤만, "마가의 구술-청각적 서사(Mark’s Oral and Aural Narrative) 이해를위한 인지 모형(Cognitive Model)으로서 틀 이론(Frame Theory)" 7 (7): 649-677, 2008

      4 Ong, Walter, "ality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word" Methuen 1981

      5 Robbins, Vernon K, "Writing as a Rhetorical Act in Plutarch and the Gospels in Persuasive Artistry. Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor ofGeorge A. Ke" JSOTPress 114-148, 1991

      6 Lakoff, George, "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories RevealAbout the Mind" University of Chicago Press 1987

      7 Sanford A. J, "Understanding Written Language: Explorationsof Comprehension Beyond the Sentence" John Wile and Sons 1981

      8 Abbott, Valerie, "The Representation of Scripts inMemory" 24 : 179-199, 1985

      9 Yadin, Yegael, "The Rediscovery of the Legendary Hero of theSecond Jewish Revolt against Rome" Random House 1971

      10 Longacre, R. E, "The Paragraph as a Grammatical Unit. In Syntax andSemantics: Discourse and Syntax 12" Academic Press 115-120, 1979

      1 R. A. de 보그란드, "언어학 입문" 한신문화사 1995

      2 박윤만, "신약 성서 본문의 문맥에 대한 인지 언어학적 고찰" 한국신학정보연구원 3 (3): 241-274, 2009

      3 박윤만, "마가의 구술-청각적 서사(Mark’s Oral and Aural Narrative) 이해를위한 인지 모형(Cognitive Model)으로서 틀 이론(Frame Theory)" 7 (7): 649-677, 2008

      4 Ong, Walter, "ality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word" Methuen 1981

      5 Robbins, Vernon K, "Writing as a Rhetorical Act in Plutarch and the Gospels in Persuasive Artistry. Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor ofGeorge A. Ke" JSOTPress 114-148, 1991

      6 Lakoff, George, "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories RevealAbout the Mind" University of Chicago Press 1987

      7 Sanford A. J, "Understanding Written Language: Explorationsof Comprehension Beyond the Sentence" John Wile and Sons 1981

      8 Abbott, Valerie, "The Representation of Scripts inMemory" 24 : 179-199, 1985

      9 Yadin, Yegael, "The Rediscovery of the Legendary Hero of theSecond Jewish Revolt against Rome" Random House 1971

      10 Longacre, R. E, "The Paragraph as a Grammatical Unit. In Syntax andSemantics: Discourse and Syntax 12" Academic Press 115-120, 1979

      11 Kelber, Werner, "The Oral and Written Gospel: The Hermeneutics of Speakingand Writing in the Synoptic" Fortress 1983

      12 Chafe, Wallace, "The Flow of Thought and the Flow of Language In Syntaxand Semantics: Discourse and Syntax 12" Academic Press 150-180, 1979

      13 Chafe, Wallace, "The Deployment of Consciousness in the Production of a Narrative in The Pear Stories" Ablex 43-44, 1980

      14 van Dijk, "Text and Context" Longman 1977

      15 Louw, J. P, "Semantics of New Testament Greek" Scholars Press 1982

      16 Schank, Roger, "Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding:An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures" LawrenceEerlabaum Associates 1977

      17 Havelock, Eric, "Preface to Plato" The Belknap Press of HavardUniversity Press 1963

      18 Park, Yoon-Man, "Mark’s Memory Resources and the Controversy Stories(Mark 2:1-3:6): An Aplication of the Frame Theory of CognitiveScience to the Markan Oral-Aural Narrative" Brill 2010

      19 Rhoads, David, "Mark as Story: An Introductionto the Narrative of a Gospel" Fortress Press 1999

      20 Dewey, Joanna, "Mark as Interwoven Tapestry: Forecasts and Echoes for aListening Audience" 53 : 221-236, 1991

      21 Cotterell, P, "Linguistics and Biblical Interpretation" IVP 1989

      22 Porter, Stanley E, "Idioms of the Greek New Testament" JSOT Press 208-301, 1994

      23 van Dijk, "Episodes as Units of Discourse Analysis. In Analyzing Discourse:Text and Talk: Georgetown University Round Table on Languages andLinguistics 1981" GeorgetownUniversity Press 177-195, 1982

      24 Black, John B, "Episodes as Chunks in NarrativeMemory" 18 : 309-310, 1979

      25 Levinsohn, Stephen, "Discourse Features of New Testament Greek" Summer Institute of Linguistics 1992

      26 Brown, Gillian, "Discourse Analysis" CambridgeUniversity Press 1983

      27 Harris, William, "Ancient Literacy" Harvard University Press 1989

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.75 0.75 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.49 0.63 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼