RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Development of a Checklist for Peer Review Activities in a Beginning College English Composition Class = Development of a Checklist for Peer Review Activities in a Beginning College English Composition Class

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102042941

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Peer review has been considered one of the promising instructional methods to help students understand the social nature of writing and the importance of revision. However, given our students’ linguistic inability and inexperience in English writing, some supportive measures need to be taken to take advantage of this invaluable learning experience to their writing ability development maximally. This study assumes that presenting them a checklist with important points to be discussed with peers is critical for the successful implementation of the activity in the classroom. When it is being developed, the instructor must reflect on the unique characteristics of her class and integrate them into the development. To demonstrate how it can be built, writing samples of students in a beginning English writing class in a four-year university and their peer review practices were studied. As the first step of the development, the students’ writing proficiency was assessed at the beginning and end of the course to establish the course objective that was defined as a proficiency level in the IELTS Writing Band Descriptors. Then, the descriptors was analyzed to identify writings features to be included in the checklist. Finally, their competence manifested in their papers and comments was studied to select suitable writing features for their proficiency and the course objective.
      번역하기

      Peer review has been considered one of the promising instructional methods to help students understand the social nature of writing and the importance of revision. However, given our students’ linguistic inability and inexperience in English writing...

      Peer review has been considered one of the promising instructional methods to help students understand the social nature of writing and the importance of revision. However, given our students’ linguistic inability and inexperience in English writing, some supportive measures need to be taken to take advantage of this invaluable learning experience to their writing ability development maximally. This study assumes that presenting them a checklist with important points to be discussed with peers is critical for the successful implementation of the activity in the classroom. When it is being developed, the instructor must reflect on the unique characteristics of her class and integrate them into the development. To demonstrate how it can be built, writing samples of students in a beginning English writing class in a four-year university and their peer review practices were studied. As the first step of the development, the students’ writing proficiency was assessed at the beginning and end of the course to establish the course objective that was defined as a proficiency level in the IELTS Writing Band Descriptors. Then, the descriptors was analyzed to identify writings features to be included in the checklist. Finally, their competence manifested in their papers and comments was studied to select suitable writing features for their proficiency and the course objective.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼