RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      디지털화 기록물의 품질 확보 방안

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11276238

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 韓國外國語大學校 大學院, 2008

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        2008

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • DDC

        025.171

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 기타서명

        Developing strategies for quality of digitized records

      • 형태사항

        iii, 84 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm.

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 李永鶴
        참고문헌: p.77-81

      • 소장기관
        • 한국외국어대학교 글로벌캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국외국어대학교 서울캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The E-government has made efforts to improve the previous paper-centered and passive work processing and to increase the effectiveness and productivity of work by digitalizing the whole documentation process. Moreover, it aims at the realization of the democratic government and the establishment of the people-oriented, administrative service based on the administrative accountability and transparency.
      As it is reflecting the changes in work environments, records management paradigm has turned its direction from the paper records-centered, preservative and closed custom to the positive ways of using electronic records-centered disclosure and inspection. Digitalized records have gotten over the limitations in the use and preservation of the paper records, and can also support not only the information on the business but also the evidential contents promptly and conveniently. Accordingly, ensuring the quality of the digitalized records is a necessary task in order to guarantee the people's rights to know and administrative accountability and transparency by offering the same contents with the paper records.
      The purpose of this study is to analyze the quality status of the domestic digitalized records and secure the quality which meets with the international standards suitable for usage and preservation, after benchmarking the digitalization trends in each country. The study process begins with examining the conceptual meaning of digitalized records which has replaced the paper records first, then its meaning in value, and about the characteristics of the digitalized records which can cause the quality changes. In addition, the necessity of the digitalized records was pointed out in terms of their usage and preservation, and the necessity of securing the quality of the digitalized records by suggesting the problems according to the quality analysis of the digitalized records in the domestic administrative bodies.
      Then, the digitalization trends of each nation were examined through the guidelines offered by Moving Here Project of The National Archives of the United Kingdom, Queensland State Archives in Australia, Archives in New Zealand, and Korea Institute for Electronic Commerce. This study has also compared and analyzed the quality requisites according to the digitalization phases suggested by each guideline after considering the digitalization trends of each nation. Finally, this present study has established the principles to secure the quality suitable for usage and preservation after complementing the present digitalized records in domestic administrative bodies, based on the comprehensive research on the above-mentioned analysis. Subsequently, by planning the quality requisites according to the digitalization phases, it suggests the plans to secure the quality of digitalized records.
      To achieve this purpose, the following points need to precede the establishment of principles and the design of quality requisites: change in the recognition of the digitalized records, keeping of professionals to manage the digitalized records, and improvement of the quality strategies under the long-term records management policy.
      번역하기

      The E-government has made efforts to improve the previous paper-centered and passive work processing and to increase the effectiveness and productivity of work by digitalizing the whole documentation process. Moreover, it aims at the realization of th...

      The E-government has made efforts to improve the previous paper-centered and passive work processing and to increase the effectiveness and productivity of work by digitalizing the whole documentation process. Moreover, it aims at the realization of the democratic government and the establishment of the people-oriented, administrative service based on the administrative accountability and transparency.
      As it is reflecting the changes in work environments, records management paradigm has turned its direction from the paper records-centered, preservative and closed custom to the positive ways of using electronic records-centered disclosure and inspection. Digitalized records have gotten over the limitations in the use and preservation of the paper records, and can also support not only the information on the business but also the evidential contents promptly and conveniently. Accordingly, ensuring the quality of the digitalized records is a necessary task in order to guarantee the people's rights to know and administrative accountability and transparency by offering the same contents with the paper records.
      The purpose of this study is to analyze the quality status of the domestic digitalized records and secure the quality which meets with the international standards suitable for usage and preservation, after benchmarking the digitalization trends in each country. The study process begins with examining the conceptual meaning of digitalized records which has replaced the paper records first, then its meaning in value, and about the characteristics of the digitalized records which can cause the quality changes. In addition, the necessity of the digitalized records was pointed out in terms of their usage and preservation, and the necessity of securing the quality of the digitalized records by suggesting the problems according to the quality analysis of the digitalized records in the domestic administrative bodies.
      Then, the digitalization trends of each nation were examined through the guidelines offered by Moving Here Project of The National Archives of the United Kingdom, Queensland State Archives in Australia, Archives in New Zealand, and Korea Institute for Electronic Commerce. This study has also compared and analyzed the quality requisites according to the digitalization phases suggested by each guideline after considering the digitalization trends of each nation. Finally, this present study has established the principles to secure the quality suitable for usage and preservation after complementing the present digitalized records in domestic administrative bodies, based on the comprehensive research on the above-mentioned analysis. Subsequently, by planning the quality requisites according to the digitalization phases, it suggests the plans to secure the quality of digitalized records.
      To achieve this purpose, the following points need to precede the establishment of principles and the design of quality requisites: change in the recognition of the digitalized records, keeping of professionals to manage the digitalized records, and improvement of the quality strategies under the long-term records management policy.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 머리말 = 1
      • 제2장 디지털화 기록물 품질 확보의 필요성 = 4
      • 제1절 디지털화 기록물의 의미 및 필요성 = 4
      • 제2절 국내 행정기관 디지털화 기록물의 품질 분석 = 9
      • 제3장 각 국의 디지털화 기록물 품질 확보 전략 = 24
      • 제1장 머리말 = 1
      • 제2장 디지털화 기록물 품질 확보의 필요성 = 4
      • 제1절 디지털화 기록물의 의미 및 필요성 = 4
      • 제2절 국내 행정기관 디지털화 기록물의 품질 분석 = 9
      • 제3장 각 국의 디지털화 기록물 품질 확보 전략 = 24
      • 제1절 디지털화 기록물 연관 가이드라인 = 24
      • 제2절 디지털화 단계별 품질 요건 비교ㆍ분석 = 29
      • 제4장 디지털화 기록물 품질 확보의 원칙 및 요건 = 56
      • 제1절 디지털화 기록물 품질 확보의 원칙 = 56
      • 제2절 디지털화 단계별 품질 요건 설계 = 58
      • 제5장 맺음말 = 75
      • 참고문헌 = 77
      • Abstract = 82
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼