RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Role of Plausibility and Structural Information in L2 Learners’ Acceptability Judgments of English Verbs

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106406894

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study investigates the role of plausibility and structural information in L2 learners’ acceptability judgments of English sentences with verbs differing in transitivity. Results showed that both structural information and semantic plausibility significantly affected acceptability ratings. L2 learners showed a tendency to give higher ratings to sentences with NP-V-NP constructions when the verb was a transitive verb. Higher ratings were also given to sentences in which the NP following the main verb was a plausible object, or semantically associated with the subject. The results also showed an interaction between structural information and plausibility, with greater effects of plausibility for the transitive verb conditions. The current results suggest that L2 learners are sensitive to both structural and plausibility factors when judging the acceptability of English sentences. However, L2 learners with lower proficiency may rely more on plausibility information for intransitive verbs. These results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that intransitive verbs are a common source of difficulty in both acquisition and processing for L2 learners, and are also compatible with theories that claim L2 learners are more reliant on semantic/plausibility information than native speakers.
      번역하기

      This study investigates the role of plausibility and structural information in L2 learners’ acceptability judgments of English sentences with verbs differing in transitivity. Results showed that both structural information and semantic plausibility ...

      This study investigates the role of plausibility and structural information in L2 learners’ acceptability judgments of English sentences with verbs differing in transitivity. Results showed that both structural information and semantic plausibility significantly affected acceptability ratings. L2 learners showed a tendency to give higher ratings to sentences with NP-V-NP constructions when the verb was a transitive verb. Higher ratings were also given to sentences in which the NP following the main verb was a plausible object, or semantically associated with the subject. The results also showed an interaction between structural information and plausibility, with greater effects of plausibility for the transitive verb conditions. The current results suggest that L2 learners are sensitive to both structural and plausibility factors when judging the acceptability of English sentences. However, L2 learners with lower proficiency may rely more on plausibility information for intransitive verbs. These results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that intransitive verbs are a common source of difficulty in both acquisition and processing for L2 learners, and are also compatible with theories that claim L2 learners are more reliant on semantic/plausibility information than native speakers.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Brooks, Patricia, "Young Children’s Overgeneralizations with Fixed Transitivity Verbs" 70 (70): 1326-1337, 1999

      2 Balcom, Patricia, "Why is This Happened? Passive Morphology and Unaccusativity" 13 (13): 1-9, 1997

      3 황종배, "Why Do Korean EFL Learners Overpassivize English Unaccusative Verbs?" 팬코리아영어교육학회 18 (18): 195-221, 2006

      4 Trueswell, John, "Verb-Specific Constraints in Lexical Preference from Garden-Paths" 19 (19): 528-553, 1993

      5 Gahl, Susanne, "Verb Subcategorization Frequencies: American English Corpus Data, Methodological Studies, and Cross-Corpus Comparisons" 36 (36): 432-443, 2004

      6 Dussias, Paola, "Usage Frequencies of Complement-Taking Verbs in Spanish and English:Data from Spanish Monolinguals and Spanish-English Bilinguals" 42 (42): 1004-1011, 2010

      7 Levin, Beth, "Unaccsativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" MIT P 1995

      8 Montrul, Silvina, "Transitivity Alternations in L2 Acquisition: Toward a Modular View of Transfer" 22 (22): 229-273, 2001

      9 Oshita, Hiroyuki, "The Unaccusative Trap in Second Language Acquisition" 23 (23): 279-304, 2001

      10 Trueswell, John, "The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution" 35 (35): 566-585, 1996

      1 Brooks, Patricia, "Young Children’s Overgeneralizations with Fixed Transitivity Verbs" 70 (70): 1326-1337, 1999

      2 Balcom, Patricia, "Why is This Happened? Passive Morphology and Unaccusativity" 13 (13): 1-9, 1997

      3 황종배, "Why Do Korean EFL Learners Overpassivize English Unaccusative Verbs?" 팬코리아영어교육학회 18 (18): 195-221, 2006

      4 Trueswell, John, "Verb-Specific Constraints in Lexical Preference from Garden-Paths" 19 (19): 528-553, 1993

      5 Gahl, Susanne, "Verb Subcategorization Frequencies: American English Corpus Data, Methodological Studies, and Cross-Corpus Comparisons" 36 (36): 432-443, 2004

      6 Dussias, Paola, "Usage Frequencies of Complement-Taking Verbs in Spanish and English:Data from Spanish Monolinguals and Spanish-English Bilinguals" 42 (42): 1004-1011, 2010

      7 Levin, Beth, "Unaccsativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" MIT P 1995

      8 Montrul, Silvina, "Transitivity Alternations in L2 Acquisition: Toward a Modular View of Transfer" 22 (22): 229-273, 2001

      9 Oshita, Hiroyuki, "The Unaccusative Trap in Second Language Acquisition" 23 (23): 279-304, 2001

      10 Trueswell, John, "The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution" 35 (35): 566-585, 1996

      11 Staub, Adrian, "The Parser Doesn’t Ignore Intransitivity, After All" 33 (33): 550-569, 2007

      12 Garnsey, Susan, "The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences" 37 : 58-93, 1997

      13 양재희, "Testing L2 Learners’ Sensitivity to Transitivity Bias in English Verbs" 언어연구소 (79) : 97-124, 2018

      14 Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl, "Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution While Reading in Second and Native Languages" 30 (30): 119-148, 1997

      15 Dussias, Paola, "Spanish-English L2 Speakers’ Use of Subcategorization Bias Information in the Resolution of Temporary Ambiguity during Second Language Reading" 128 (128): 501-513, 2008

      16 Felser, Claudia, "Processing wh-Dependencies in a Second Language: a Cross-Modal Priming Study" 23 (23): 9-36, 2007

      17 Traxler, Matthew, "Plausibility and Verb Subcategorization in Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading" 34 (34): 1-30, 2005

      18 Roberts, Leah, "Plausibility and Recovery from Garden Paths in Second Language Processing" 32 : 299-331, 2011

      19 Traxler, Matthew, "Plausibility and Processing of Unbounded Dependencies: An Eye-Tracking Study" 35 : 454-475, 1996

      20 Despina Papadopoulou, "Parsing Strategies in L1 and L2Processing: A Study of Relative Processing in Greek" 25 (25): 501-528, 2003

      21 Ju, Min Kyoung, "Overpassivization Errors by Second Language Learners" 22 (22): 85-111, 2000

      22 Chung, Taegoo, "Multiple Factors in the L2 Acquisition of English Unaccusative Verbs" 52 (52): 59-87, 2014

      23 Wilson, Michael, "Making Simple Sentences Hard: Verb Bias Effects in Simple Sentences" 60 (60): 368-392, 2006

      24 Pinker, Steven, "Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure" MIT P 1989

      25 Yip, Virginia, "Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English" John Benjamins 1995

      26 Trueswell, John, "How to Prune a Garden Path by Nipping it in the Bud" 39 (39): 102-123, 1998

      27 Clashen, Harald, "Grammatical Processing in Language Learners" 27 (27): 3-42, 2006

      28 Jennings, Fabio, "Graded Effects of Verb Subcategory Preferences on Parsing: Support for Constraint-Satisfaction Models" 12 (12): 485-504, 1997

      29 Bowerman, Melissa, "Explaining Language Universals" Basil Blackwell 73-101, 1988

      30 Pickering, Martin, "Evidence Against the Use of Subcategorization Frequency in the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies" 18 (18): 469-503, 2003

      31 Dussias, Paola, "Effects of Reading Span and Plausibility in the Reanalysis of Wh-Gaps by Chinese-English Second Language Speakers" 26 (26): 443-472, 2010

      32 Ferreira, Victor, "Do Verb Bias Effects on Sentence Production Reflect Sensitivity to Comprehension or Production Factors?" 66 (66): 1548-1571, 2013

      33 Hochberg, Judith, "Children’s Judgments of Transitivity Errors" 13 : 317-334, 1986

      34 Lee, Osterhout, "Brain Potentials Elicited by Garden-Path Sentences: Evidence of the Application of Verb Information During Parsing" 20 (20): 706-803, 1994

      35 Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" MIT P 1965

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of British & American Studies -> 영미연구
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of British & American Studies
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.17 0.17 0.18
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.16 0.15 0.462 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼