Creativity of images: using digital consensual assessment to evaluate mood boards

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Mood boards are used frequently in design and product development as well as in academic courses related to fashion design. However objectively evaluating the creativity of fashion design mood boards is often difficult. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation is to examine reliability of a digital consensual assessment instrument measuring creativity, using expert (from related domains) and non-expert raters (students). Creativity measures were compared with the mood board themes to further investigate any relationships between mood board types and the consensual assessment. Independent samples t test comparing group means indicated expert raters evaluated the mood boards significantly higher in creativity than the non-experts, t (99) = −6.71, p < .001, (95% CI −.57, −.29), while Pearson correlation results indicate a significant relationship between the two groups of raters, r (50) = .33, p < .01. ANOVA results for all raters indicated a significant difference between the five subject matter categories; F (4, 95) = 4.64, p < .005. Overall, expert and non-expert raters reported significant reliability, which further supports prior research using consensual assessment for creativity measures across domains.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Simonton, D. K., "Varieties of perspectives on creativity reply to commentators" 4 (4): 466-467, 2009

2 Amabile, T., "The social psychology of creativity : A componential conceptualization" 45 : 357-376, 1983

3 Amabile, T., "The social psychology of creativity" Springer 1983

4 Cassidy, T., "The mood board process modeled and understood as a qualitative design research tool" 3 (3): 225-251, 2011

5 Baer, J., "The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training" 30 (30): 183-187, 1996

6 Plucker, J., "The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated : Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment" 21 : 36-39, 1998

7 Plucker, J. A., "The criterion problem and creativity in film: Psychometric characteristics of various measures" 2 (2): 190-, 2008

8 Baer, J., "The case for domain specificity of creativity" 11 : 173-177, 1998

9 Cohen, J., "The Earth is round (p < .05)" 49 : 997-1003, 1994

10 Hennessey, B. A., "Storytelling : A method for assessing children’s creativity" 22 : 235-246, 1988

11 Gliner, J. A., "Problems with null hypothesis significance testing (NHST): what do the textbooks say?" 71 (71): 83-92, 2002

12 Garner, S., "Problem interpretation and resolution via visual stimuli : The use of ‘mood boards’in design education" 20 (20): 57-64, 2001

13 McDonagh, D., "Mood boards as a design catalyst and resource : Research an under-researched area" 7 (7): 16-31, 2004

14 Cassidy, T. D., "Mood boards : Current practice in learning and teaching strategies and students’ understanding of the process" 1 (1): 43-54, 2008

15 Torrance, E. P., "Guiding creative talent" Prentice-Hall 1962

16 Baer, J., "Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity" 10 : 25-31, 1997

17 Lucero, A., "Framing, aligning, paradoxing, abstracting, and directing: How design mood boards work" 438-447, 2012

18 Gardner, H., "Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences" Basic Books 1983

19 Baer, J., "Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products" 16 (16): 113-117, 2004

20 Sawyer, R. K., "Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation" Oxford University Press 2006

21 Kaufman, J. C., "Expertise, domains, and the consensual assessment technique" 43 (43): 223-233, 2009

22 Boyes, J., "Essential fashion design: illustration, theme boards, body coverings, projects, portfolios" Batsford 1998

23 Hennessey, B. A., "Encyclopedia of creativity" Academic Press 347-359, 1999

24 Kaufman, J. C., "Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way?" 49 (49): 260-265, 2005

25 Plucker, J. A., "Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way?" 26 (26): 470-478, 2009

26 Runco, M. A., "Creativity theories and themes : Research, development and practice" Elsevier Academic Press 2007

27 Amabile, T., "Creativity in context" Westview Press 1996

28 Baer, J., "Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach" 1993

29 Guilford, J. P., "Creativity" 5 : 444-454, 1950

30 Gardner, H., "Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, and Gandhi" Basic Books 1993

31 Kaufman, J. C., "Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique : New evidence of reliability" 2 (2): 96-106, 2007

32 John Baer, "Brief Report: Rater-Domain Interactions in the Consensual Assessment Technique" 대한사고개발학회 19 (19): 87-92, 2009

33 Kaufman, J. C., "Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative?" 24 (24): 83-91, 2012

34 Runco, M. A., "A longitudinal study of exceptional giftedness and creativity" 12 : 161-164, 1999

35 Kaufman, J. C., "A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique" 20 (20): 171-178, 2008