RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Usefulness of Pep-Test for Laryngo-Pharyngeal Reflux: A Pilot Study in Primary Care

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106959489

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a digestive disorder characterized by nausea, regurgitation, and heartburn. Gastroesophageal reflux is the primary cause of laryngeal symptoms, especially chronic posterior laryngitis. The best diagnostic...

      Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a digestive disorder characterized by nausea, regurgitation, and heartburn. Gastroesophageal reflux is the primary cause of laryngeal symptoms, especially chronic posterior laryngitis.
      The best diagnostic test for this disease is esophageal impedance-pH monitoring; however, it is poorly employed owing to its high cost and invasiveness. Salivary pepsin measured using a lateral flow device (Pep-test) has been suggested as an indirect marker of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The present study tested the reliability of Pep-test in diagnosing LPR in uninvestigated primary care attenders presenting with chronic laryngeal symptoms, and evaluated the raw pepsin concentration in patients with LPR.
      Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional pilot study was conducted on 86 suspected patients with LPR and 59 asymptomatic subjects as controls in three Italian primary care settings. A reflux symptom index questionnaire was used to differentiate patients with LPR (score >13) from controls (score <5). Two saliva samples were collected, and comparisons between the groups were performed using two-sided statistical tests, according to variable distributions.
      Results: There was no statistical difference in the salivary pepsin positivity between LPR patients and controls, whereas the pepsin intensity value was higher in controls than in LPR patients.
      Conclusion: A high prevalence of pepsin positivity was observed in asymptomatic controls. Pepsin measurement should not be considered as a diagnostic test for LPR in primary care patients.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Belafsky PC, "Validity and reliability of the re-flux symptom index(RSI)" 16 : 274-277, 2002

      2 De Bortoli N, "Use of a non-invasive pepsin diagnostic test to detect GERD : correlation with MII-pH evaluation in a series of suspected NERD patients : a pilot study" 45 (45): S68-S69, 2013

      3 Koufman JA, "The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) : a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury" 101 (101): 1-78, 1991

      4 Jones R, "The gastro-oesophageal reflux disease impact scale : a patient management tool for primary care" 25 : 1451-1459, 2007

      5 Lagergren J, "Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma" 340 : 825-831, 1999

      6 Knight J, "Sensitive pepsin immunoassay for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux" 115 : 1473-1478, 2005

      7 Bardhan KD, "Reflux revisited : advancing the role of pepsin" 2012 : 646901-, 2012

      8 Saritas Yuksel E, "Rapid salivary pepsin test : blinded assessment of test performance in gastroesophageal reflux disease" 122 : 1312-1316, 2012

      9 Lowden M, "Prevalence of symptoms suggestive of extra-oesophageal reflux in a general practice population in the UK" 34 : 32-35, 2009

      10 Hayat JO, "Pepsin in saliva for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease" 64 : 373-380, 2015

      1 Belafsky PC, "Validity and reliability of the re-flux symptom index(RSI)" 16 : 274-277, 2002

      2 De Bortoli N, "Use of a non-invasive pepsin diagnostic test to detect GERD : correlation with MII-pH evaluation in a series of suspected NERD patients : a pilot study" 45 (45): S68-S69, 2013

      3 Koufman JA, "The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) : a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury" 101 (101): 1-78, 1991

      4 Jones R, "The gastro-oesophageal reflux disease impact scale : a patient management tool for primary care" 25 : 1451-1459, 2007

      5 Lagergren J, "Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma" 340 : 825-831, 1999

      6 Knight J, "Sensitive pepsin immunoassay for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux" 115 : 1473-1478, 2005

      7 Bardhan KD, "Reflux revisited : advancing the role of pepsin" 2012 : 646901-, 2012

      8 Saritas Yuksel E, "Rapid salivary pepsin test : blinded assessment of test performance in gastroesophageal reflux disease" 122 : 1312-1316, 2012

      9 Lowden M, "Prevalence of symptoms suggestive of extra-oesophageal reflux in a general practice population in the UK" 34 : 32-35, 2009

      10 Hayat JO, "Pepsin in saliva for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease" 64 : 373-380, 2015

      11 Kim TH, "Pepsin detection in the sputum/saliva for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with clinically suspected atypical gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms" 77 : 201-206, 2008

      12 Gatta L, "Meta-analysis : the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for laryngeal symptoms attributed to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease" 25 : 385-392, 2007

      13 Stein DJ, "Incidence of chronic laryngitis" 122 : 771-774, 2013

      14 Katz PO, "Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease" 108 : 308-328, 2013

      15 Wilson JA, "Gastroesophageal reflux and posterior laryngitis" 98 : 405-410, 1989

      16 Gurski RR, "Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease" 32 : 150-160, 2006

      17 Savarino E, "Expert consensus document : advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD" 14 : 665-676, 2017

      18 Wong RK, "ENT manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux" 95 (95): S15-S22, 2000

      19 Strugala V, "Detection of pepsin in sputum : a rapid and objective measure of airways reflux" 47 : 339-341, 2016

      20 Wang L, "Correlation of pepsin-measured laryngopharyngeal reflux disease with symptoms and signs" 143 : 765-771, 2010

      21 Potluri S, "Comparison of a salivary/sputum pepsin assay with 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring for detection of gastric reflux into the proximal esophagus, oropharynx, and lung" 48 : 1813-1817, 2003

      22 Gelardi M, "Clinical-diagnostic correlations in laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR) : the role of Peptest" 1 : 1-8, 2017

      23 Jaspersen D, "Clinical course of laryngo-respiratory symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease during routine care : a 5-year follow-up" 29 : 1172-1178, 2009

      24 Dettmar PW, "Chronic pharyngitis and the association with pepsin detection and reflux disease" 1 : 17-, 2018

      25 Savarino E, "Characteristics of reflux episodes and symptom association in patients with erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease : study using combined impedance-pH off therapy" 105 : 1053-1061, 2010

      26 Roman S, "Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease : update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group" 29 : 1-15, 2017

      27 Collen MJ, "Age does not affect basal gastric acid secretion in normal subjects or in patients with acid-peptic disease" 89 : 712-716, 1994

      28 Yadlapati R, "Abilities of oropharyngeal pH tests and salivary pepsin analysis to discriminate between asymptomatic volunteers and subjects with symptoms of laryngeal irritation" 14 : 535-542, 2016

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-09-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 가정의학회지 -> Korean Journal of Family Medicine KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-12-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine -> Korean Journal of Family Medicine KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.24 0.26 0.54 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼