RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      일개 의과대학에서 실시한 표준화환자 (SP)를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험 (CPX) 결과 분석 = Analysis of the Evaluation for Clinical Performance Examination using Standardized Patients in one Medical School

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105445530

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Analysis of the evaluation for clinical performance examination (CPX) using standardized patient (SP) in one medical school was done to compare the evaluations between the staffs and SPs, among the staffs, and among the SPs, and to investigate the correlation between the evaluation scores and the school record.
      Methods: Clinical performance examination was done to seventy-nine 4th grade medical students. Checklist was modified from the existing reference and added more items. Three SPs who were non-physician volunteers were trained by authors about what is the disease and how to act the patient and how to evaluate the students. Three staffs and three SPs both filled up the checklist at the same time right after each student s performance.
      Results: Agreements between the staffs and the SPs were relatively high enough in the items of physical examination and management but low in the history taking related items although they were statistically significant. In the evaluation between the staffs and the SPs, the mean scores in the management and overall attitude were not significantly different, but, mean scores in the history taking, physical examination and overall skill were significantly different. Among the staffs there were no significant differences in history taking, physical examination, overall attitude, and there were significant differences in patient management and overall skill. Among the SPs there were no significant differences in physical exam, patient management and overall skill, and there were significant differences in history taking and overall attitude. The correlation coefficients between the evaluation scores and school records, between the evaluation scores and written report were relatively low respectively.
      Conclusion: To increase the agreement rates between the staffs and SPs, more training for the staffs and SPs are necessary
      번역하기

      Purpose: Analysis of the evaluation for clinical performance examination (CPX) using standardized patient (SP) in one medical school was done to compare the evaluations between the staffs and SPs, among the staffs, and among the SPs, and to investigat...

      Purpose: Analysis of the evaluation for clinical performance examination (CPX) using standardized patient (SP) in one medical school was done to compare the evaluations between the staffs and SPs, among the staffs, and among the SPs, and to investigate the correlation between the evaluation scores and the school record.
      Methods: Clinical performance examination was done to seventy-nine 4th grade medical students. Checklist was modified from the existing reference and added more items. Three SPs who were non-physician volunteers were trained by authors about what is the disease and how to act the patient and how to evaluate the students. Three staffs and three SPs both filled up the checklist at the same time right after each student s performance.
      Results: Agreements between the staffs and the SPs were relatively high enough in the items of physical examination and management but low in the history taking related items although they were statistically significant. In the evaluation between the staffs and the SPs, the mean scores in the management and overall attitude were not significantly different, but, mean scores in the history taking, physical examination and overall skill were significantly different. Among the staffs there were no significant differences in history taking, physical examination, overall attitude, and there were significant differences in patient management and overall skill. Among the SPs there were no significant differences in physical exam, patient management and overall skill, and there were significant differences in history taking and overall attitude. The correlation coefficients between the evaluation scores and school records, between the evaluation scores and written report were relatively low respectively.
      Conclusion: To increase the agreement rates between the staffs and SPs, more training for the staffs and SPs are necessary

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 서 론
      • 대상 및 방법
      • 결 과
      • 고 찰
      • 참 고 문 헌
      • 서 론
      • 대상 및 방법
      • 결 과
      • 고 찰
      • 참 고 문 헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "표준화 환자를 이용한 임상실기능력평가 워크샵 I How to assess clinical competence" 10 (10): 153-164, 1998

      2 "표준화 환자를 이용한 임상실기능력평가 워크샵" 10 (10): 235-253, 1998

      3 "임상의학입문 (Introduction to Clinical Medicine )평가를 위한 객관적 임상실기시험(Objective Structured Clinical Examination) 경험" 13 (13): 289-298, 2001

      4 "임상실습시 선택과목제 시행 경험" 13 (13): 221-230, 2001

      5 "임상실습 교육을 위한 표준화환자 프로그램의 개발 및 적용" 12 (12): 353-361, 2000

      6 "임상수행평가의 세계적 추세에 따른 표준화환자 프로그램의 토착화 방안 연구" 12 (12): 377-392, 2000

      7 "의학과 4학년 종합평가로서의 객관적-구조적 임상능력 평가 의 경험" 1 : 43-57, 1998

      8 "의사시험에 임상수기수행평가를 도입하기 위한 예비연구" 13 (13): 277-287, 2001

      9 "의사국가시험에 임상수행능력측정의 도입을 위한 객관적 임상실기시험 (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) 경험." 13 (13): 47-57, 2001

      10 "우리나라 표준화환자 프로그램 활용 현황과 개선 방안 - 관련 문헌 고찰 및 현장 연구를 중심으로" 13 (13): 27-39, 2001

      1 "표준화 환자를 이용한 임상실기능력평가 워크샵 I How to assess clinical competence" 10 (10): 153-164, 1998

      2 "표준화 환자를 이용한 임상실기능력평가 워크샵" 10 (10): 235-253, 1998

      3 "임상의학입문 (Introduction to Clinical Medicine )평가를 위한 객관적 임상실기시험(Objective Structured Clinical Examination) 경험" 13 (13): 289-298, 2001

      4 "임상실습시 선택과목제 시행 경험" 13 (13): 221-230, 2001

      5 "임상실습 교육을 위한 표준화환자 프로그램의 개발 및 적용" 12 (12): 353-361, 2000

      6 "임상수행평가의 세계적 추세에 따른 표준화환자 프로그램의 토착화 방안 연구" 12 (12): 377-392, 2000

      7 "의학과 4학년 종합평가로서의 객관적-구조적 임상능력 평가 의 경험" 1 : 43-57, 1998

      8 "의사시험에 임상수기수행평가를 도입하기 위한 예비연구" 13 (13): 277-287, 2001

      9 "의사국가시험에 임상수행능력측정의 도입을 위한 객관적 임상실기시험 (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) 경험." 13 (13): 47-57, 2001

      10 "우리나라 표준화환자 프로그램 활용 현황과 개선 방안 - 관련 문헌 고찰 및 현장 연구를 중심으로" 13 (13): 27-39, 2001

      11 "객관적으로 구조화된 임상시험의 시행 경험" 2 : 363-381, 1998

      12 "The programmed patient." 802-805, 1964

      13 "The medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part II 연구" 9 : 65-72, 1997

      14 "The accuracy of standardized-patient presentations" 25 : 100-109, 1991

      15 "Statistical methods for rates and proportions" New York 1981

      16 "Standardized patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance checklist items" 26 : 99-104, 1992

      17 "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patients rating" 3 : 74-85, 1991

      18 "Notes from the 7th Ottawa International Conference on Medical Education and Assessment" 12 : 9-12, 1996

      19 "Mastering the OSCE/CSA." McGraw-Hill Co (b) : 1996

      20 "Lessons learned form six years of international administrations of the ECFMG's SP-based clinical skills assessment" 73-, 1998

      21 "Lessons learned form six years of international administrations of the ECFMG's SP-based clinical skills assessment" aca med : 73-, 1998

      22 "Evaluation of physical examination skills" jama : 258-, 1987

      23 "ECFMG Assessment of clinical competence of graduates of fireign medical schools" 270 : 1041-, 1993

      24 "Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination" 1 : 447-451, 1975

      25 "An assessment of the consistency and accuracy of standardized patients' simulations" 65-57, 1987

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-07-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education
      외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.02 1.02 0.76
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.82 0.76 1.204 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼