The purpose of this study is to analyze the tertiary experimental class of the 'Chemical Reaction' section of the Chemistry 1 'First Step in Chemistry' unit in 11th grade of high school using the self-regulating learning strategy, then the teaching-le...
The purpose of this study is to analyze the tertiary experimental class of the 'Chemical Reaction' section of the Chemistry 1 'First Step in Chemistry' unit in 11th grade of high school using the self-regulating learning strategy, then the teaching-learning effect on scientific exploration ability, scientific attitude and academic achievement was analyzed. Experimental classes were conducted for control groups according to the experimental process of textbooks, and self-regulating learning strategies were recognized and utilized for experimental groups. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups in the pre-test, the mean value of the experimental group was significantly higher in the post-test.
The most difficult part for students was the self-preparation process when they prepared a guideline for the previous class. It can be interpreted that they are less prepared because they thought the difference between what they have learned and what they will learn is a difference.
The degree of understanding of the chemical reaction formula has increased in both groups as the experimental classes of the chemical reaction formula and the quantitative relationship have progressed. In the course of students finding causality in the experiment and drawing conclusions, the meaning of Molbi and Coefficient Ratio was understood, which can be seen as both groups showing high performance after the experimental class.
In the case of scientific exploration ability, there was the highest difference in the 'assumption setting' and the lowest difference in the 'variable control'. In the case of scientific attitudes, the difference in average points between the two groups in 'curiosity' and 'preparation' was the biggest. As a result of the post-test of academic performance, the average score of the experimental group was somewhat higher than that of the control group.
The correlation between self-regulating learning elements and scientific exploration ability, scientific attitude and academic achievement was as follows. As a result of the follow-up examination of the experimental group, synchronous control showed the highest correlation with them (scientific attitude and academic achievement) in the details of self-regulating learning, followed by cognitive control and behavioral control. The correlation between behavior and motivation appeared low. The correlation between the detailed elements of self-regulating learning and the factors of scientific inquiry ability was low. It was difficult to see the correlation between students' scientific exploration ability and self-regulating learning factors due to the lack of time for experimentation. In the case of scientific exploration ability, it is necessary to check the increase by increasing the number of experiments. The correlation between the details of students' self-regulating learning and the scientific attitude has been shown to be entirely correlated. In the field of academic achievement, experimental groups showed greater improvement than control groups. The correlation between the detailed elements of self-regulating learning and academic achievement was high in order of cognitive, behavioral, and motivation.