RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      How do fund families utilize the fund performance evaluation system? : Study on the ‘Evaluation-ship Bias’ in Korean equity funds

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101756534

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper shows how the fund performance evaluation system influences the fund market and fund family behaviors. Evaluation-ship Bias is defined as the outperforming of evaluated funds over non-evaluated funds. Regarding the Evaluationship Bias, this...

      This paper shows how the fund performance evaluation system influences the fund market and fund family behaviors. Evaluation-ship Bias is defined as the outperforming of evaluated funds over non-evaluated funds. Regarding the Evaluationship Bias, this study confirmed two things in empirical analysis of Korean equity funds. First, this paper verified that there was Evaluation-ship Bias in Korea, so fund families’ performances were over-estimated. Second, it is also found that fund families did favoritism to evaluated funds in management activities. Fund families were more attentive to EV performance and took strategic and risk-taking measures to improve its ratings. This paper suggests that another factor, the performance evaluation system itself, is what causes fund families to favor some funds. The existence of too high numbers of Korean funds is an example of this evaluation system bias. We can expect similar phenomena to occur in other countries as well. We also suggest that the introduction of GIPS will diminish the evaluation system bias and contribute to the development of the Korean fund market.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • I. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Background
      • Ⅲ. Methodology
      • Ⅳ. Data
      • ABSTRACT
      • I. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Background
      • Ⅲ. Methodology
      • Ⅳ. Data
      • Ⅴ. Evaluation-ship Bias
      • 1. Performance Comparison (1): EV Portfolio vs. NEV Portfolio
      • 2. Performance Comparison (2): Panel Data Analysis
      • Ⅵ. Favoritism: Fund families
      • 1. Favoritism in the Application of Strategies
      • 2. Differentiated Response to Performance
      • Ⅶ. Evaluation-ship bias and fund flow
      • Ⅷ. Conclusions
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼