RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Predicting Colonoscopy Time: A Quality Improvement Initiative

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105072003

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: There is lack of consensus on the optimal time allotted for colonoscopy, which increases patient wait times. Ouraim was to identify and quantify the individual pre-procedural factors that determine the total procedure time (TPT) of co...

      Background/Aims: There is lack of consensus on the optimal time allotted for colonoscopy, which increases patient wait times. Ouraim was to identify and quantify the individual pre-procedural factors that determine the total procedure time (TPT) of colonoscopy.
      Methods: This retrospective study involved 4,494 subjects, undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. Effects of age, sex, body mass index,abdominal surgery history, procedure indication (screening, surveillance, or diagnostic), procedure session (morning or afternoon),and endoscopist’s experience (fellow or attending) on TPT were evaluated using multiple regression analysis. A p<0.05 was consideredsignificant.
      Results: A total of 1,239 subjects satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Women, older individuals, and those with a history ofabdominal surgery were found to have a shorter TPT (p>0.05) as did afternoon session colonoscopies (p=0.004). Less experiencedendoscopists had longer TPTs (p>0.05). Screening (p=0.01) and surveillance (p=0.008) colonoscopies had a longer TPT than diagnosticprocedures. Overall, the F-value of the regression model was 0.0009.
      Conclusions: The indication for colonoscopy and the time of day have statistically significant associations with TPT. These results willhelp in streamlining workflow, reduce wait time, and improve patient satisfaction.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Ristikankare M, "The effects of gender and age on the colonoscopic examination" 32 : 69-75, 2001

      2 Witte TN, "The difficult colonoscopy" 21 : 487-490, 2007

      3 Vijan S, "Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States" 20 : 507-515, 2004

      4 Liakakos T, "Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management" 18 : 260-273, 2001

      5 Deepanshu Jain, "Obesity and Cecal Intubation Time" 대한소화기내시경학회 49 (49): 187-190, 2016

      6 American Cancer Society, "Key statistics for colorectal cancer" American Cancer Society

      7 Adye B, "Incidence of abdominal wall hernia in aortic surgery" 175 : 400-402, 1998

      8 Anderson JC, "Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy" 54 : 558-562, 2004

      9 Lee CK, "Endoscopist fatigue may contribute to a decline in the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy" 49 : e51-e56, 2015

      10 Streett SE, "Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in women: can we do better?" 65 : 1047-1049, 2007

      1 Ristikankare M, "The effects of gender and age on the colonoscopic examination" 32 : 69-75, 2001

      2 Witte TN, "The difficult colonoscopy" 21 : 487-490, 2007

      3 Vijan S, "Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States" 20 : 507-515, 2004

      4 Liakakos T, "Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management" 18 : 260-273, 2001

      5 Deepanshu Jain, "Obesity and Cecal Intubation Time" 대한소화기내시경학회 49 (49): 187-190, 2016

      6 American Cancer Society, "Key statistics for colorectal cancer" American Cancer Society

      7 Adye B, "Incidence of abdominal wall hernia in aortic surgery" 175 : 400-402, 1998

      8 Anderson JC, "Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy" 54 : 558-562, 2004

      9 Lee CK, "Endoscopist fatigue may contribute to a decline in the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy" 49 : e51-e56, 2015

      10 Streett SE, "Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in women: can we do better?" 65 : 1047-1049, 2007

      11 Barclay RL, "Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy" 6 : 1091-1098, 2008

      12 Robert S. Bresalier, "Early Detection of and Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia" 거트앤리버 발행위원회 3 (3): 69-80, 2009

      13 Waye JD, "Difficult colonoscopy" 9 : 676-678, 2003

      14 Muller S, "Degree of adhesions after repair of incisional hernia" 14 : 399-404, 2010

      15 World Health Organization, "Colorectal cancer: estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012" World Health Organization

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-12-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회지 -> Clinical Endoscopy
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy -> Clinical Endoscopy
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-06-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회 -> 대한소화기내시경학회지 KCI등재후보
      2006-06-21 학술지등록 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.23 0.22 0.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.18 0.38 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼