A New Method for Developing Seismic Collapse Fragility Curves Grounded on State-Based Philosophy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the current process to achieve the collapse fragility curve in practical applications seems too complicated, also time-consuming to dominant by structure designers, the focus of this study is on introducing of a new approach for establishing collapse fragility curves which requires less analytical effort. To achieve this goal, state-based philosophy (SBP) has been taken into consideration. This theory benefits from some similarities in the nature of every failure process in solid mechanics regardless of its source. In this study these similarities are used intelligently in procedure of formulating new fragility function which has couple of unknown parameters. Next, it will be shown that these parameters can be attained from two different sources: the pushover curves of the structure, some selective damage data from incremental dynamic analysis analyses. Finally a complete form of new collapse fragility function which is called "SBP fragility function" proposed as a substitute for conventional collapse fragility function. The most important advantage of this new fragility function is its non-probabilistic structure that will make a huge difference in the amount of effort required to achieve the fragility curves. In this research, in order to ensure the efficiency, accuracy of this fragility function all steps of SBP fragility analyses are done on some special moment frames models, their results are presented.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Mazzoni, S., "The open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES)user command-language manual"

2 Lallemant, D., "Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves" 44 (44): 1373-1389, 2015

3 Mwafy, A. M., "Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings" 23 (23): 407-424, 2001

4 Ranjbaran, A., "State functions: the milestone of fracture" 86 (86): 1311-1324, 2016

5 Ji, J., "Seismic fragility relationships of reinforced concrete high-rise buildings" 18 (18): 259-277, 2009

6 Baltzopoulos, G., "SPO2FRAG: software for seismic fragility assessment based on static pushover" 15 (15): 4399-4425, 2017

7 FEMA, P., "Quantification of building seismic performance factors (FEMA P695, ATC-63)"

8 Çavdar, Ö., "Pushover and nonlinear time history analysis evaluation of a RC building collapsed during the Van(Turkey) earthquake on October 23, 2011" 70 (70): 657-673, 2014

9 Cornell, C. A., "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines" 128 (128): 526-533, 2002

10 Hariri-Ardebili, M. A., "Performance-based seismic assessment of steel frames using endurance time analysis" 69 : 216-234, 2014

11 Lee, D., "Nonlinear pushover analysis of concrete column reinforced by multi-layered, high strength steel UL700plates" 90 : 1-14, 2015

12 Ranjbaran, A., "New finite-element formulation for buckling analysis of cracked structures" 140 (140): 1-10, 2014

13 De Luca, F., "Near-optimal piecewise linear fits of static pushover capacity curves for equivalent SDOF analysis" 42 (42): 523-543, 2013

14 Elkady, A., "Modeling of the composite action in fully restrained beam-to-column connections: Implications in the seismic design and collapse capacity of steel special moment frames" 43 (43): 1935-1954, 2014

15 Smyrou, E., "Implementation and verification of a masonry panel model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of infilled RC frames" 9 (9): 1519-1534, 2011

16 Hogan, L. S., "Full-scale experimental pushover testing of an existing URM building" 15 (15): 66-81, 2018

17 Venture, N. C. J., "Evaluation of the fema p-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors" US Department of Commerce Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology 20899-28600, 2010

18 Lee, D., "Evaluation of seismic performance factors for steel DIAGRID structural system design" 10 (10): 735-755, 2016

19 Comitè Europèen de, N., "Eurocode 8—Design of Structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings"

20 Akkar, S., "Displacement-based fragility functions for low-and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings" 21 (21): 901-927, 2005

21 Vamvatsikos, D., "Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA" 35 (35): 1097-1117, 2006

22 Vargas, Y. F., "Capacity, fragility and damage in reinforced concrete buildings: A probabilistic approach" 11 (11): 2007-2032, 2013

23 Zareian, F., "Basic concepts and performance measures in prediction of collapse of buildings under earthquake ground motions" 19 (19): 167-181, 2010

24 Sudret, B., "Assessment of the lognormality assumption of seismic fragility curves using non-parametric representations"

25 AISC, A., "AISC 341-10, seismic provisions for structural steel buildings"

26 Nayak, B., "A proposed reference current signal generation technique for shunt active power filter" 13 (13): 1834-1849, 2018

27 Chopra, A. K., "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings" 33 (33): 903-927, 2004

28 FEMA, A., "440, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures"

29 Hartloper, A., "11.29: Updates to the ASCE-41-13 provisions for the nonlinear modeling of steel wide-flange columns for performance-based earthquake engineering" 1 (1): 3072-3081, 2017