한국의 도구개발 간호연구에서의 타당도에 대한 고찰 = Validity of Instrument Development Research in Korean Nursing Research

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: This integrative review study was done to analyze methods used for validation studies in Korean nursing research. Methods: Inthis study, the literature on instrument development in nursing research from Research Information Sharing Service (RISS) and majornursing journal databases in Korea were examined. The MeSH search terms included ‘nursing’, ‘instrument’, ‘instrument development’,‘validation’ and 189 articles were included in the review. Results: The most frequently reported validity type was content validity, followedby construct validity, and criterion validity. One third reported a single type of validity, and 15% of the studies demonstrated three kinds ofvalidity at the same time. In about 40% of the studies, both content and construct validity were examined. Conclusion: The results of thestudy indicate that it is necessary to provide a wider variety of evidence to establish whether instruments are valid enough to use in nursing research.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김경남, "한국어판 간호 섬망 선별 도구 개발 및 검증" 한국간호과학회 42 (42): 414-423, 2012

2 이원석, "타당도에 대한 통합적 관점" 한국교육평가학회 21 (21): 67-79, 2008

3 이인숙, "지역사회 거주 노인의 허약선별도구 타당도 평가" 지역사회간호학회 22 (22): 302-314, 2011

4 주현옥, "영유아 발달선별검사를 위한 체크리스트 개발 및 타당도 검정" 아동간호학회 15 (15): 34-41, 2009

5 최선주, "신경외과 환자의 욕창발생 예측도구 개발" 병원간호사회 11 (11): 95-108, 2005

6 신희선, "발달문제 위험 아동 선별을 위한 한국형 Denver II 검사의 타당성에 관한 연구" 아동간호학회 11 (11): 316-321, 2005

7 강현철, "구성타당도 평가에 있어서 요인분석의 활용" 한국간호과학회 43 (43): 587-594, 2013

8 Seong, T. J., "Validity and reliability" Hakjisa Publisher 2002

9 Ribeiro, M. A. S., "Validation studies in nursing: Integrative review" 14 (14): 218-228, 2013

10 American Educational Research Association, "The standards for educational and psychological testing" AERA Publications 1999

11 DeVellis, R. F., "Scale development: Theory and applications" Sage Publications, Inc 2003

12 DeVellis, R. F., "Scale development: Theory and applications" Sage Publications, Inc 2011

13 Park, H. A., "Problem and issues in developing measurement scales in nursing" 14 (14): 46-72, 2005

14 Lee, E. O., "Nursing research and statistical analysis" Soomoonsa 2009

15 Choi, S. H., "Nursing outcomes measurement indicators" Chonnam National University Press 2012

16 Waltz, C. F., "Measurement in nursing and health research" Springer Publishing Company 2010

17 Gronlund, N. E., "Measurement and evaluation in teaching" Macmillan Publishing Company 1990

18 Pett, M. A., "Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research" Sage Publications, Inc 2003

19 Hopfenbecka, T. N., "Examining evidence for the validity of PISA learning strategy scales based on student response processes" 11 (11): 95-121, 2011

20 So, A. Y., "Development of a home care need assessment tool: Focused on home care nursing diagnoses based on self care" 13 (13): 433-443, 2002

21 Kane, M. T., "Current concerns in validity theory" 38 (38): 319-342, 2000

22 Campbell, D. T, "Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix" 56 (56): 81-105, 1959

23 Cronbach, L. J., "Construct validity in psychological tests" 52 (52): 281-302, 1955

24 Foster, R. L, "An integrative review of literature examining psychometric properties of instruments measuring anxiety or fear in hospitalized children" 13 (13): 94-106, 2012

25 Carnevale, T., "An integrative review of adolescent depression screening instruments: Applicability for use by school nurses" 24 (24): 51-57, 2011

26 신희선, "0-5세를 위한 한국형 영유아 발달 선별검사(K-CDR)의 타당성에 대한 연구" 아동간호학회 13 (13): 222-229, 2007