RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지식경영 성공을 위한 인적자원관리 전략에 관한 연구 = A Study on Relationship between the Success of Knowledge Management and Human Resource Management Strategy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5067271

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the relationship between knowledge management and human resource management strategy. The Process of knowledge management is composed knowledge creation, accumulation, sharing, utilization and learning. HRM strategy varies along two key dimension - the relationship-transaction continuum and the high utilization-low utilization continuum. Firms were clustered into one of four HRM strategy - Type Ⅰ(relationship-low utilization), Type Ⅱ(transaction-low utilization), Type Ⅲ(relationship-high utilization), and Type Ⅳ(transaction-high utilization). Data are gathered from a total of 148 companies from Busan region. The results is as follows; The success of knowledge management is more heavily affected by the high utilization and relationship HRM strategy. And the companies that use Type Ⅲ strategy are highly associated with the success of knowledge management.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the relationship between knowledge management and human resource management strategy. The Process of knowledge management is composed knowledge creation, accumulation, sharing, utilization and le...

    The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the relationship between knowledge management and human resource management strategy. The Process of knowledge management is composed knowledge creation, accumulation, sharing, utilization and learning. HRM strategy varies along two key dimension - the relationship-transaction continuum and the high utilization-low utilization continuum. Firms were clustered into one of four HRM strategy - Type Ⅰ(relationship-low utilization), Type Ⅱ(transaction-low utilization), Type Ⅲ(relationship-high utilization), and Type Ⅳ(transaction-high utilization). Data are gathered from a total of 148 companies from Busan region. The results is as follows; The success of knowledge management is more heavily affected by the high utilization and relationship HRM strategy. And the companies that use Type Ⅲ strategy are highly associated with the success of knowledge management.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유규창, "한국기업의 인적자원관리 시스템의 유형 분류와 결정요인에 관한 연구" 31 (31): 1887-1915, 2003

    2 김상수, "지식경영의 성공요인에 관한 실증적 연구" 29 (29): 585-616, 2000

    3 이순철, "지식경영 구축을 위한 방법론" 1999

    4 Malhotra, "“Managing the Four Stages of EDP Growth”" 76-88, 1993

    5 Kogut Bruce, "“Knowledge of the firm and the Replication of Technology”" 383-397, 1992

    6 Nonaka Ikujiro, "“A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”" 14-37, 1994

    7 APQC, "Using Information Technology to Support Knowledge Management" 1997

    8 Ruggles, "The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in" 40 (40): 80-89, 1998

    9 Rousseau, "The Problem of the Psychological Contract Considered" 19 : 665-671, 1998

    10 Takeuchi, "The Knowledge-Creating Company" Oxford University Press, New York 1995

    1 유규창, "한국기업의 인적자원관리 시스템의 유형 분류와 결정요인에 관한 연구" 31 (31): 1887-1915, 2003

    2 김상수, "지식경영의 성공요인에 관한 실증적 연구" 29 (29): 585-616, 2000

    3 이순철, "지식경영 구축을 위한 방법론" 1999

    4 Malhotra, "“Managing the Four Stages of EDP Growth”" 76-88, 1993

    5 Kogut Bruce, "“Knowledge of the firm and the Replication of Technology”" 383-397, 1992

    6 Nonaka Ikujiro, "“A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”" 14-37, 1994

    7 APQC, "Using Information Technology to Support Knowledge Management" 1997

    8 Ruggles, "The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in" 40 (40): 80-89, 1998

    9 Rousseau, "The Problem of the Psychological Contract Considered" 19 : 665-671, 1998

    10 Takeuchi, "The Knowledge-Creating Company" Oxford University Press, New York 1995

    11 Drucker, "The Information Executives Truly Need" 54-56, 1995

    12 Konno Noboru, "The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation For Knowledge Creation" 40 (40): 40-54, 1998

    13 O′Leary, "Knowledge Management Systems: Converting and Connecting" 30-33, 1998

    14 KPMG, "Knowledge Management Research Report 1998" 1998

    15 이건창, "KMPI :지식경영 성과지표의 실증적 분석에 관한 연구 - 코스닥에 상장된 벤처기업을 중심으로" 31 (31): 577-601, 2002

    16 Wing, "Integrating Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management" 30 (30): 399-405, 1997

    17 Davenport Thomas H, "Improving Knowledge Work Processes" 37 (37): 53-65, 1996

    18 O′Dell, "If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices" 40 (40): 154-174, 1998

    19 Grundy, "How Are Corporate Strategy and Human Resources Strategy Linked?" 24 (24): 503-521, 1998

    20 Gartner Group, "Foundations for Enterprise Knowledge Management" 6 : 1997

    21 Szulanski Gabriel, "Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm" 19 : 27-43, 1996

    22 Tuomi, I, "Data Is More Than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory" 16 (16): 103-117, 2000

    23 Stein, "Actualizing Organizational Memor with Information Systems" 6 (6): 83-117, 1995

    24 이원덕, "21세기 노동정책" 한국노동연구원 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2025 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2021-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.78 1.78 2.18
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.17 2.17 3.204 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼