RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      우리나라 병원감염관리의 실태 = A Study on Investigation the Nosocomial Infection Control Program in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2083749

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In Korea, the nosocomial infection control program is not well developed. The one of the main reasons of this situation is the medical cost paying system. Under FFS(Fee for service)system, there is no incentives for doctors and hospitals to do active nosocomial infection control. On the contrary, the doctors and hospitals get more profit with nosocomial infections. And the medical ethics is too weak incentives to change the medical personnel attitudes in nosocomial infection control. Funthermore there are many misunderstandings in the nosocomial infection control practices in Korea. For examples, some ineffective nosocomial infection control methods like fogging and air culture are still adapted in many hospitals. To decrease nosocomial infection occurrence and for effective uses of medical cost, active nosocomial infection programs is needed.
      This study was planned to investigate the nosocomial infection program in Korea. Mailing questionnaires were sended to all general hospitals(212 hospitals) in Korea.
      The result was as follows;
      1) 106 general hospitals (75.7%) had infection control committees and only 83 general hospitals(54.4%) had infection control committee meetings since January of 1991.
      2) Only one hospital had infection control nurse. In 53 general hospitals(37.9%), infection control personnels were assigned to dual positions.
      3) There were some disagreements in infection control guidlines and infection control practices. For example, in 48 general hospitals(36.9%) had 'Hand washing policy' but only 4 general hospitals used 'paper towel' for hand washing.
      With those results, an effective nosocomial infection control program was suggested;
      1) All general hospitals should have infection control committees and the infection control committee meeting have to be opened at least 4times per year.
      2) Hospitals over 300 beds should have at least one infection control nurse.
      3) To activate the nosocomial infection program, the changes of the national public health policy in needed, for example, medical cost paying system.
      번역하기

      In Korea, the nosocomial infection control program is not well developed. The one of the main reasons of this situation is the medical cost paying system. Under FFS(Fee for service)system, there is no incentives for doctors and hospitals to do active ...

      In Korea, the nosocomial infection control program is not well developed. The one of the main reasons of this situation is the medical cost paying system. Under FFS(Fee for service)system, there is no incentives for doctors and hospitals to do active nosocomial infection control. On the contrary, the doctors and hospitals get more profit with nosocomial infections. And the medical ethics is too weak incentives to change the medical personnel attitudes in nosocomial infection control. Funthermore there are many misunderstandings in the nosocomial infection control practices in Korea. For examples, some ineffective nosocomial infection control methods like fogging and air culture are still adapted in many hospitals. To decrease nosocomial infection occurrence and for effective uses of medical cost, active nosocomial infection programs is needed.
      This study was planned to investigate the nosocomial infection program in Korea. Mailing questionnaires were sended to all general hospitals(212 hospitals) in Korea.
      The result was as follows;
      1) 106 general hospitals (75.7%) had infection control committees and only 83 general hospitals(54.4%) had infection control committee meetings since January of 1991.
      2) Only one hospital had infection control nurse. In 53 general hospitals(37.9%), infection control personnels were assigned to dual positions.
      3) There were some disagreements in infection control guidlines and infection control practices. For example, in 48 general hospitals(36.9%) had 'Hand washing policy' but only 4 general hospitals used 'paper towel' for hand washing.
      With those results, an effective nosocomial infection control program was suggested;
      1) All general hospitals should have infection control committees and the infection control committee meeting have to be opened at least 4times per year.
      2) Hospitals over 300 beds should have at least one infection control nurse.
      3) To activate the nosocomial infection program, the changes of the national public health policy in needed, for example, medical cost paying system.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼