RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Integrating SARA Assessment with Reading Comprehension Training in AutoTutor

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107856196

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Facing the demands of the pandemic and distance learning, English learners require educational technologies that are accessible, engaging, and effective. Meeting these demands requires educational technology developers to consider learners’ sociocul...

      Facing the demands of the pandemic and distance learning, English learners require educational technologies that are accessible, engaging, and effective. Meeting these demands requires educational technology developers to consider learners’ sociocultural contexts. Learning theories can be applied to meet individuals’ needs to optimize chances for participation, engagement, and learning gains. This article describes two Internet-based digital technologies that target struggling adult readers who need to improve their comprehension skills: SARA (Study Aid and Reading Assessment) and AutoTutor for Adult Reading Comprehension. The SARA assessment provides a diagnostic profile for individuals’ reading strengths and weaknesses. This profile can be used to guide the selection of reading comprehension lessons in AutoTutor-ARC, a digital technology that both adapts to learners’ performances and engages them in an immersive learning experience using a three-way conversation with computer agents acting as a tutor and a peer to discuss texts. We discuss how these technologies can be integrated into educational settings to improve engagement and learning.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 OECD, "Time for the U.S. to reskill? What the survey of adult skills says" OECD Publishing 2013

      2 Autor, D., "The skill content of recent technological change : An empirical exploration" 118 (118): 1279-1334, 2003

      3 Kintsch, W., "The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : A construction-integration model" 95 (95): 163-182, 1988

      4 Kieffer, M. J., "The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners" 21 (21): 783-804, 2008

      5 Perfetti, C., "The psycholinguistics of basic literacy" 21 (21): 127-149, 2001

      6 Greenberg, D., "The challenges facing adult literacy programs" 3 (3): 39-54, 2008

      7 Binder, K. S., "The Wiley handbook of adult literacy" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 131-149, 2019

      8 Sabatini, J., "The Wiley handbook of adult literacy" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 15-39, 2019

      9 Graesser, A. C., "The Wiley handbook of adult literacy" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 471-493, 2019

      10 Shin, J., "Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth" 34 (34): 164-172, 2000

      1 OECD, "Time for the U.S. to reskill? What the survey of adult skills says" OECD Publishing 2013

      2 Autor, D., "The skill content of recent technological change : An empirical exploration" 118 (118): 1279-1334, 2003

      3 Kintsch, W., "The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : A construction-integration model" 95 (95): 163-182, 1988

      4 Kieffer, M. J., "The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners" 21 (21): 783-804, 2008

      5 Perfetti, C., "The psycholinguistics of basic literacy" 21 (21): 127-149, 2001

      6 Greenberg, D., "The challenges facing adult literacy programs" 3 (3): 39-54, 2008

      7 Binder, K. S., "The Wiley handbook of adult literacy" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 131-149, 2019

      8 Sabatini, J., "The Wiley handbook of adult literacy" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 15-39, 2019

      9 Graesser, A. C., "The Wiley handbook of adult literacy" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 471-493, 2019

      10 Shin, J., "Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth" 34 (34): 164-172, 2000

      11 Sabatini, J., "SARA reading components tests, RISE forms: Technical adequacy and test design" Educational Testing Service 2019

      12 Sabatini, J., "Relative effectiveness of reading intervention programs for adults with low literacy" 4 (4): 118-133, 2011

      13 Perfetti, C., "Reading ability : Lexical quality to comprehension" 11 (11): 357-383, 2007

      14 Fang, Y., "Patterns of adults with low literacy skills interacting with an intelligent tutoring system"

      15 PIAAC Literacy Expert Group, "PIAAC literacy: A conceptual framework" OECD Publishing 2009

      16 Doughty, C. J., "Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning" 7 (7): 50-80, 2003

      17 Mehdipour, Y., "Mobile learning for education : Benefits and challenges" 3 (3): 93-101, 2013

      18 Perfetti, C., "Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading ability" Rowman and Littleford Education 3-20, 2012

      19 Wayman, M. M., "Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading" 41 (41): 85-120, 2007

      20 Ehri, L. C., "Learning to read words : Theory, findings, and issues" 9 (9): 167-188, 2005

      21 Seidenberg, M., "Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it" Basic Books 2017

      22 Olson, R. K., "Introduction to the special issue on genes, environment, and reading" 20 (20): 1-11, 2007

      23 Carlisle, J. F., "Improving reading comprehension: Research-based principles and practices" York Press 2002

      24 Proctor, C. P., "Improving comprehension online : Effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders" 24 (24): 517-544, 2011

      25 National Academy Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, "How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures" National Academies Press 2018

      26 Graesser, A. C., "Handbook of research on learning and instruction" Routledge Press 460-482, 2017

      27 Graesser, A. C., "Conversations with AutoTutor help students learn" 26 (26): 124-132, 2016

      28 Nagy, W., "Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students" 98 (98): 134-147, 2006

      29 Graesser, A. C., "Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension" 3 (3): 371-398, 2011

      30 Kintsch, W., "Comprehension : A paradigm for cognition" Cambridge University Press 1998

      31 Pimentel, S., "College and career readiness standards for adult education" United States Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education 2013

      32 Graesser, A. C., "Coh-metrix measures text characteristics at multiple levels of language and discourse" 115 (115): 210-229, 2014

      33 Chen, S., "Automated disengagement tracking within an intelligent tutoring system" 3 (3): 114-130, 2021

      34 McClure, E., "A study of the use of conjunctions across grades and ethnic groups" 19 : 217-236, 1985

      35 Olney, A. M., "10th International Educational Data Mining Society" EDM Society 128-134, 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.79
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.84 0.81 1.585 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼