온라인 상점의 발전과 뉴미디어의 등장으로 소비자들 사이에 상품정보에 대한 의견이 교환되기 시작하면서 온라인 소비자 리뷰에 대한 많은 연구가 진행되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 온...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100067709
2013
Korean
028.305
KCI등재
학술저널
3-17(15쪽)
13
0
상세조회0
다운로드온라인 상점의 발전과 뉴미디어의 등장으로 소비자들 사이에 상품정보에 대한 의견이 교환되기 시작하면서 온라인 소비자 리뷰에 대한 많은 연구가 진행되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 온...
온라인 상점의 발전과 뉴미디어의 등장으로 소비자들 사이에 상품정보에 대한 의견이 교환되기 시작하면서 온라인 소비자 리뷰에 대한 많은 연구가 진행되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 온라인 소비자 리뷰와 관련된 연구의 개괄적인 흐름을 파악하여 연구경향을 분석하고 향후 연구방향을 탐색하였다. 온라인 소비자 리뷰 연구에서는 리뷰의 유용성, 리뷰로 인한 소비자의 태도변화를 주로 다루었으며 이에 영향을 미치는 변수들은 대체로 메시지 요인, 리뷰어 요인, 소비자 요인, 그리고 제품/서비스 요인으로 구분되었다. 메시지의 특성에 대한 연구는 메시지의 양과 평가적 메시지가 많을수록 유용하며, 메시지의 방향성에 대해서는 상황에 따라 다르게 나타나고 있다. 또한 리뷰어의 신뢰성 및 평판, 소비자의 제품지식과 제품관여도, 제품/서비스의 유형에 의해 리뷰의 영향력이 어떻게 달라지는지에 대한 연구가 이루어지고 있다. 향후에는 소셜미디어의 등장으로 보다 활발하게 소비자 리뷰가 이루어지고 사회적 연결망을 통해 전달됨에 따라 이에 따른 소비자 리뷰의 영향력에 대한 연구가 추가적으로 이루어질 필요가 있다. 또한 온라인 소비자 리뷰를 역이용하는 기업이 늘어남에 따라 온라인 소비자 리뷰의 부작용에 대한 실증적인 연구가 필요해 보인다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
As electronic marketplaces grow and a large number of consumers exchange their opinions on products and services on the Internet, many studies have been conducted in the area of online consumer reviews. This paper analyzes the research trend of the on...
As electronic marketplaces grow and a large number of consumers exchange their opinions on products and services on the Internet, many studies have been conducted in the area of online consumer reviews. This paper analyzes the research trend of the online consumer reviews by investigating those studies in an attempt to provide future research directions. Many researchers have focused on the effects of online reviews on consumer behaviors as well as the usefulness of the online reviews. In particular, review contents, characteristics of reviewers/consumers and features of products/services have been identified as influencing factors on the effects of the online consumer reviews. For the review contents, the number and the volume of the contents have increasing effects on the online reviews, while the direction (positive vs. negative) of the contents has resulted in conflicting effects of the review. The reputation and trustfulness of reviewers, consumers’prior knowledge on the products, consumers’product involvement, and types of the products were investigated as these factors influence the effectiveness of the online consumer reviews. Social media (such as Facebook and Twitter) nowadays play an important role to disseminate online reviews among consumers. Thus, it is necessary to study how social media influence the effects of online reviews on consumers. Since some firms abuse the online reviews for their own sakes, we recognize the necessity for empirical studies on the side effects of the online reviews.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Cui, G., "“Online reviews as a driver of new product sales" 2010
2 Chen, Y., "third-party production review and firm marketing strategy" 24 (24): 218-240, 2005
3 Schiffman, L. G., "consumer Behavior" Prentice Hall 2000
4 Liu, Y., "Word-of-mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue" 70 (70): 74-89, 2006
5 Brister, J. M., "Word of mouth communication and their effects in consumer network" 18 : 155-169, 1991
6 Xia, L., "Word of mouse: The role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews" 9 (9): 3-13, 2008
7 Clemons, E. K., "When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry" 23 (23): 149-171, 2006
8 Mudambi, S. M., "What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com" 34 (34): 185-200, 2010
9 Godes, D., "Using Online Conversations to Study Word of mouth Communication" 23 (23): 545-560, 2004
10 Liu, Q. B., "Unveiling user-generated content: Designing websites to best present customer reviews" 54 (54): 231-240, 2011
1 Cui, G., "“Online reviews as a driver of new product sales" 2010
2 Chen, Y., "third-party production review and firm marketing strategy" 24 (24): 218-240, 2005
3 Schiffman, L. G., "consumer Behavior" Prentice Hall 2000
4 Liu, Y., "Word-of-mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue" 70 (70): 74-89, 2006
5 Brister, J. M., "Word of mouth communication and their effects in consumer network" 18 : 155-169, 1991
6 Xia, L., "Word of mouse: The role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews" 9 (9): 3-13, 2008
7 Clemons, E. K., "When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry" 23 (23): 149-171, 2006
8 Mudambi, S. M., "What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com" 34 (34): 185-200, 2010
9 Godes, D., "Using Online Conversations to Study Word of mouth Communication" 23 (23): 545-560, 2004
10 Liu, Q. B., "Unveiling user-generated content: Designing websites to best present customer reviews" 54 (54): 231-240, 2011
11 Lee, M. K., "Understanding customer knowledge sharing in webbased discussion boards: an exploratory study" 16 (16): 289-303, 2006
12 Jansen, B. J., "Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth" 60 (60): 2169-2188, 2009
13 Briggs, P, "Trust in online advice" 20 (20): 321-332, 2002
14 Chen, P. Y., "The impact of online recommendations and consumer feedback on sale" 2004
15 Chintagunta, P., "The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets" 29 (29): 944-957, 2010
16 Chintagunta, P. K., "The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets" 29 (29): 944-957, 2010
17 Maheswaran, D., "The effects of knowledge, motivation, and type of message on ad processing and product judgments" 6 : 66-73, 1990
18 Kumar, N., "The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites" 17 (17): 425-439, 2006
19 Sahoo, N., "The Halo Effect in Multicomponent Ratings and Its Implications for Recommender Systems: The Case of Yahoo! Movies" 23 (23): 231-246, 2012
20 Chevalier, J. A., "The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews" 43 (43): 345-354, 2003
21 Wilson, E. J., "Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size" 21 (21): 101-112, 1993
22 Friedkin, N., "Social influence network theory: Toward a science of strategic modification of interpersonal influence systems, In Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: Workshop summary and papers" The National Academies press 2003
23 Sridhar, S., "Social influence effects in online product ratings" 76 (76): 70-88, 2012
24 Rowley, J., "Remodeling marketing communications in an internet environment" 11 (11): 203-212, 2001
25 Li, X., "Product reviews and competition in markets for repeat purchase products" 27 (27): 9-42, 2011
26 Li, X., "Price effects in online product reviews: An analytical model and empirical analysis" 34 (34): 809-832, 2010
27 Racherla, P., "Perceived ‘usefulness’of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories" 11 (11): 548-559, 2012
28 Chen, Y., "Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix" 54 (54): 477-491, 2008
29 Sun, T., "Online Word-of-Mouth (or Mouse): An Exploration of Its Antecedents and Consequences" 11 (11): 1104-1127, 2006
30 Chatterjee, P., "Online Reviews: Do Consumers Use Them?" 28 : 129-133, 2001
31 Smith, D., "Online Peer and Editorial Recommendations, Trust, and Choice in Virtual Markets" 19 (19): 15-37, 2005
32 Webster, C. M., "Network analysis in marketing" 12 (12): 8-18, 2004
33 Thompson, N., "More companies pay heed to their‘ word of mouse’reputation"
34 Palka, W., "Mobile word-of-mouth-A grounded theory of mobile viral marketing" 24 (24): 172-185, 2009
35 Zaichkowsky, J. L., "Measuring the Involvement Construct" 12 (12): 341-352, 1985
36 Bowman, D., "Managing Customer-Initiated Contacts with Manufactures: The Impact on Share of Category Requirements and Word-of-Mouth Behavior" 38 (38): 281-297, 2001
37 Zhang, W., "Knowledge Adoption in Online Communities of Practice" 2003
38 Sorensen, A. T., "Is Any Publicity Good Publicity? A Note on the Impact of Book Reviews" Stanford University 2004
39 Bickart, B., "Internet Forums as Influential Sources of Consumer Information" 15 (15): 31-40, 2001
40 Zhu, F., "Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and Consumer characteristics" 74 (74): 133-148, 2010
41 Pham, M. T., "Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion" 30 (30): 503-518, 2004
42 Basuroy, S., "How Critical are Critical Reviews? The Box Office Effects of Film Critics, Star-power and Budgets" 67 (67): 105-117, 2003
43 Amblee, N., "Freeware Downloads: An Empirical Investigation Into the Impact of Expert and User Reviews On Demand for Digital Goods" 2007
44 McKnight, H., "Factors of information credibility for an internet advice site" 2006
45 Forman, C., "Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets" 19 (19): 291-313, 2008
46 Ba, S., "Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior" 26 (26): 243-268, 2002
47 Korfiatis, N, "Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content" 11 (11): 205-217, 2012
48 Ghose, A., "Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics" 23 (23): 1498-1512, 2011
49 Hennig-Thurau, T., "Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms:What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?" 18 (18): 38-52, 2004
50 Moon, S. K., "Dynamic Effects among Movie Ratings, Movie Revenues, and Viewer Satisfaction" 74 : 108-121, 2010
51 Duan, W., "Do online reviews matter?-An empirical investigation of panel data" 45 (45): 1007-1016, 2008
52 Hu, N., "Do Online Reviews Affect Product Sales? The Role of Reviewer characteristics and Temporal Effects" 9 (9): 201-214, 2008
53 Cheung, M. Y., "Credibility of Electronic Word of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations" 13 (13): 9-38, 2009
54 Bei, L. T., "Consumers’online information search behavior and the phenomenon of search vs. experience products" 25 (25): 449-467, 2004
55 Sher, P. J., "Consumer skepticism and Online Reviews: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective" 37 (37): 137-143, 2009
56 Assael, H., "Consumer behavior : A strategic approach" Houghton Mifflin 2003
57 Peterson, R. A., "Consumer Behavior" Prentice-Hall, Inc 2003
58 Holbrook, M. B., "Beyond attitude structure: Toward the informational determinants of attitude" 15 : 545-556, 1978
59 Chen, P. Y., "All Reviews Are Not Created Equal: The Disaggregate Impact of Reviews on Sales on Amazon.com"
60 Nelson, P., "Advertising as information" 82 (82): 729-754, 1974
61 Josang, A., "A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision" 43 (43): 618-644, 2007
62 Dellarocas, C., "A Statistical Measure of a Population’s Propensity to Engage in Post-Purchase Online Word-of-Mouth" 21 (21): 277-285, 2006
63 이계남, "2010년 인터넷 이용실태 조사" 한국인터넷진흥원 2010
EA기반 정보자원 통합 추진 및 관리 방안에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-11 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국정보사회진흥원 -> 한국정보화진흥원 | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-06-19 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Informatization Policy | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-04-19 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국전산원 -> 한국정보사회진흥원영문명 : 미등록 -> National Information Society Agency | ![]() |
| 2005-05-28 | 학술지등록 | 한글명 : 정보화정책외국어명 : 미등록 | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2000-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.54 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.44 | 1.31 | 1.756 | 1.1 |