한국 현대시교육의 현황과 과제―고등학교 국어과 교재에 나타난 문제점을 중심으로 = Present Condition of Korean Contemporary Poetry Education一Focused on the Problems appearing in the High School Korean Language Textbooks

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyzed 11 High School Textbooks of Korean Language 1 and 2 and 11 High School Textbooks of Literature published according to the 2011 revised national curriculum of the Korean Language in order to check the present condition of the literary thoughts, views, teaching methodologies that currently affect the contemporary poetry (literature) education. As a result, it was possible to identify problematic phenomena broadly in three categories in the present poetic literature education: (1) Narrator and rhyme/meter as poetic devices; (2) Wrong customs in the history of poetic literature; and (3) textbook power. Concerning (1), it is necessary to remember that although the concept of the narrator should extensively be applied to any texts, the narrator is specially named ‘poetic narrator’ only in poetry, which is unreasonable. Moreover, concerning the problem of the narrator in poetry, it is necessary to adjust the focus to the restoration of the conversations between ‘the narrator and the audience’ and ‘the implied poet and the implied reader.’ The problem of rhyme/meter is more serious. Since there has been no poetry with a fixed form in Korean, no feature has existed, which might be called the standard for rhyme/meter. Nevertheless, we reached the discussions on the syllabic meter and foot meter, for which no grounds could be found by defining the lyrics such as Sijo, Goryeo Gayo and Hyangga as poetry or expanding and applying the experience of the learning of Japanese poetry or British/American poetry to our poetry. Concerning (2), this study discussed that it would not be reasonable to define empathy/compassion as the traditional aesthetic consciousness or feature in the history of Korean poetry and that the theory of trend appearing in the 1940s has still affected too much. In (3), this researcher suggested that since the textbook has excessive power, it is necessary to find a way to get rid of or alleviate that and at the same time, pointed out that it is necessary to have an attitude of citing the original text properly.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김용직, "현대시원론" 학연사 1994

2 조창환, "한국현대시의 운율론적 연구" 일지사 1986

3 이승하, "한국현대시문학사" 소명출판 2019

4 정한모, "한국현대시문학사" 일지사 1974

5 한계전, "한국현대시론연구" 일지사 1983

6 권영민, "한국현대문학사1" 민음사 2002

7 조동일, "한국시가의 전통과 율격" 한길사 1982

8 조윤제, "한국문학사" 탐구당 1976

9 김용직, "한국근대시사1" 새문사 1983

10 정병욱, "한국고전시가론" 신구문화사 1977

11 이명찬, "한국 현대시의 운(율)문적 성격에 대한 성찰" 한국문학교육학회 (50) : 33-56, 2016

12 한계전, "한국 현대시론사 연구" 문학과지성사 1998

13 이숭원, "한국 현대시 연구의 맥락" 태학사 2014

14 김대행, "한국 시가 구조 연구" 삼영사 1976

15 이명찬, "한국 근대시사 톺아보기" 청운 2017

16 이명찬, "한국 근대시교육 톺아보기" 청운 2017

17 한국문학교육학회, "텍스트 읽기" 역락 2010

18 조윤제, "조선 시가의 연구" 을유문화사 1948

19 한국문학교육학회, "정전(正典)" 역락 2010

20 강영미, "정전 검열 기억" 지식을만드는지식 2019

21 채트먼 S., "이야기와 談論" 고려원 1991

22 김대행, "운율" 문학과지성사 1984

23 이승훈, "시론" 고려원 1983

24 오세영, "시론" 서정시학 2013

25 김준오, "시론" 문장 1987

26 유종호, "시란 무엇인가" 민음사 2001

27 제랄드 프랭스, "서사학" 문학과지성사 1988

28 정우택, "새 민족문학사 강좌 2" 창비 2009

29 이명찬, "산문시론 시고(試考)" 한국시학회 (45) : 217-246, 2016

30 이광수, "문학이란 하오"

31 한국문학교육학회, "문학 능력" 역락 2010

32 이명찬, "근대시사에 있어서의 시조부흥운동의 성격에 관한 연구" 한국시학회 (57) : 199-237, 2019

33 최남선, "朝鮮國民文學으로의 時調" (16) : 1926

34 이병기, "[단행본] 가람문선" 신구문화사 1966