RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

    Propofol과 Remifentanil을 사용한 전정맥마취 후 Doxapram이 마취 회복에 미치는 효과 = Effect of daxapram on recovery following total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104351217

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of doxapram on recovery following propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.
    Methods: Forty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either doxapram 1 mg/kg or normal saline at the end of surgery under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Clinical recovery from anesthesia was assessed by times to spontaneous breathing, eye opening on verbal command, extubation, and discharge from the postanesthetic care unit (PACU). Bispectral index (BIS) values, blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded every 2 min for 16 min after the administration of doxapram or saline. The incidences of side effects were checked in the recovery room.
    Results: Spontaneous breathing was recovered after 6.2 ± 1.1 minutes in the Doxapram group versus 9.2 ± 1.8 minutes in the normal saline group (P < 0.001). Times to eye and extubation were also shorter in the Doxapram patients than in the normal saline patients (6.9 ± 1.0 and 8.1 ± 1.7 min versus 10.4 ± 2.0 and 12.0 ± 2.6 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). However, the times to PACU discharge were not different between the two groups (46.9 ± 4.9 min versus 47.0 ± 6.0 min, respectively). The patients in the Doxapram group showed higher mean BIS values compared with the normal saline group during emergence, but there were no differences in arterial blood pressure, heart rate and incidences of side effects between the two groups.
    Conclusions: Doxapram 1 mg/kg hastens early recovery from TIVA with propofol and remifentanil, and this emergence effect correlates with higher BIS values. Doxapram, however, does not affect the discharge time from the PACU and incidences of side effects.
    번역하기

    Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of doxapram on recovery following propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Methods: Forty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either doxapram 1 mg/kg or nor...

    Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of doxapram on recovery following propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.
    Methods: Forty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either doxapram 1 mg/kg or normal saline at the end of surgery under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Clinical recovery from anesthesia was assessed by times to spontaneous breathing, eye opening on verbal command, extubation, and discharge from the postanesthetic care unit (PACU). Bispectral index (BIS) values, blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded every 2 min for 16 min after the administration of doxapram or saline. The incidences of side effects were checked in the recovery room.
    Results: Spontaneous breathing was recovered after 6.2 ± 1.1 minutes in the Doxapram group versus 9.2 ± 1.8 minutes in the normal saline group (P < 0.001). Times to eye and extubation were also shorter in the Doxapram patients than in the normal saline patients (6.9 ± 1.0 and 8.1 ± 1.7 min versus 10.4 ± 2.0 and 12.0 ± 2.6 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). However, the times to PACU discharge were not different between the two groups (46.9 ± 4.9 min versus 47.0 ± 6.0 min, respectively). The patients in the Doxapram group showed higher mean BIS values compared with the normal saline group during emergence, but there were no differences in arterial blood pressure, heart rate and incidences of side effects between the two groups.
    Conclusions: Doxapram 1 mg/kg hastens early recovery from TIVA with propofol and remifentanil, and this emergence effect correlates with higher BIS values. Doxapram, however, does not affect the discharge time from the PACU and incidences of side effects.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of doxapram on recovery following propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.
    Methods: Forty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either doxapram 1 mg/kg or normal saline at the end of surgery under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Clinical recovery from anesthesia was assessed by times to spontaneous breathing, eye opening on verbal command, extubation, and discharge from the postanesthetic care unit (PACU). Bispectral index (BIS) values, blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded every 2 min for 16 min after the administration of doxapram or saline. The incidences of side effects were checked in the recovery room.
    Results: Spontaneous breathing was recovered after 6.2 ± 1.1 minutes in the Doxapram group versus 9.2 ± 1.8 minutes in the normal saline group (P < 0.001). Times to eye and extubation were also shorter in the Doxapram patients than in the normal saline patients (6.9 ± 1.0 and 8.1 ± 1.7 min versus 10.4 ± 2.0 and 12.0 ± 2.6 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). However, the times to PACU discharge were not different between the two groups (46.9 ± 4.9 min versus 47.0 ± 6.0 min, respectively). The patients in the Doxapram group showed higher mean BIS values compared with the normal saline group during emergence, but there were no differences in arterial blood pressure, heart rate and incidences of side effects between the two groups.
    Conclusions: Doxapram 1 mg/kg hastens early recovery from TIVA with propofol and remifentanil, and this emergence effect correlates with higher BIS values. Doxapram, however, does not affect the discharge time from the PACU and incidences of side effects.
    번역하기

    Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of doxapram on recovery following propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Methods: Forty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either doxapram 1 mg/kg or no...

    Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of doxapram on recovery following propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.
    Methods: Forty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either doxapram 1 mg/kg or normal saline at the end of surgery under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Clinical recovery from anesthesia was assessed by times to spontaneous breathing, eye opening on verbal command, extubation, and discharge from the postanesthetic care unit (PACU). Bispectral index (BIS) values, blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded every 2 min for 16 min after the administration of doxapram or saline. The incidences of side effects were checked in the recovery room.
    Results: Spontaneous breathing was recovered after 6.2 ± 1.1 minutes in the Doxapram group versus 9.2 ± 1.8 minutes in the normal saline group (P < 0.001). Times to eye and extubation were also shorter in the Doxapram patients than in the normal saline patients (6.9 ± 1.0 and 8.1 ± 1.7 min versus 10.4 ± 2.0 and 12.0 ± 2.6 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). However, the times to PACU discharge were not different between the two groups (46.9 ± 4.9 min versus 47.0 ± 6.0 min, respectively). The patients in the Doxapram group showed higher mean BIS values compared with the normal saline group during emergence, but there were no differences in arterial blood pressure, heart rate and incidences of side effects between the two groups.
    Conclusions: Doxapram 1 mg/kg hastens early recovery from TIVA with propofol and remifentanil, and this emergence effect correlates with higher BIS values. Doxapram, however, does not affect the discharge time from the PACU and incidences of side effects.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Product Information. Dopram(R), "doxapram" A.H. Robins Co. Inc 1991

    2 Kulkarni P, "Ventilatory parameters in children during propofol anaesthesia: a comparision with halothane" 43 : 653-659, 1996

    3 Taylor MB, "Ventilatory effects of propofol during indection of anaesthesia. Comparison with thiopentone" 41 : 816-820, 1996

    4 Burki NK, "Ventilatory effects of doxapram in conscious human subjects" 85 : 600-604, 1984

    5 Riddel PL, "Use of doxapram as an arousal agent in outpatient general anesthesia" 50 : 921-924, 1978

    6 Noe FE, "Use of a new analeptic, doxapram hydrochloride, during general anesthesia and recovery" 44 : 206-213, 1965

    7 Streisand JB, "The respiratory effects of propofol with and without fentanyl" 66 : 171-, 1987

    8 Siker ES, "The analeptic effects of doxapram hydrochloride on thiopentone induced depression" 36 : 216-223, 1964

    9 Goodman NW, "Some ventilatory effects of propofol as sole anaesthetic agent" 59 : 1497-1503, 1987

    10 Nieuwenhuijs DJ, "Response surface modeling of remifentanil-propofol interaction on cardiorespiratory control and bispectral index" 98 : 312-322, 2003

    1 Product Information. Dopram(R), "doxapram" A.H. Robins Co. Inc 1991

    2 Kulkarni P, "Ventilatory parameters in children during propofol anaesthesia: a comparision with halothane" 43 : 653-659, 1996

    3 Taylor MB, "Ventilatory effects of propofol during indection of anaesthesia. Comparison with thiopentone" 41 : 816-820, 1996

    4 Burki NK, "Ventilatory effects of doxapram in conscious human subjects" 85 : 600-604, 1984

    5 Riddel PL, "Use of doxapram as an arousal agent in outpatient general anesthesia" 50 : 921-924, 1978

    6 Noe FE, "Use of a new analeptic, doxapram hydrochloride, during general anesthesia and recovery" 44 : 206-213, 1965

    7 Streisand JB, "The respiratory effects of propofol with and without fentanyl" 66 : 171-, 1987

    8 Siker ES, "The analeptic effects of doxapram hydrochloride on thiopentone induced depression" 36 : 216-223, 1964

    9 Goodman NW, "Some ventilatory effects of propofol as sole anaesthetic agent" 59 : 1497-1503, 1987

    10 Nieuwenhuijs DJ, "Response surface modeling of remifentanil-propofol interaction on cardiorespiratory control and bispectral index" 98 : 312-322, 2003

    11 Beers R, "Remifentanil update: clinical science and utility" 18 : 1085-1104, 2004

    12 Egan TD, "Remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A preliminary appraisal" 29 : 80-94, 1995

    13 Levine JD, "Naloxone dose dependently produces analgesia and hyperalgesia in postoperative pain" 278 : 740-741, 1979

    14 Stephen CR, "Investigation of doxapram a postanesthetic respiratory stimulant" 43 : 628-640, 1964

    15 Gupta PK, "Hastening of arousal after general anaesthesia with doxaprm hydrochloride" 45 : 493-496, 1973

    16 Roy RC, "Electroencephalographic evidence of arousal in dogs from halothane after doxapram, physostigmine, or naloxone" 55 : 392-397, 1981

    17 Allen CJ, "Effect of doxapram on heavy sedation produced by intravenous diazepam" 286 : 1181-1182, 1983

    18 Wu CC, "Doxapram shortens recovery following sevoflurane anesthesia" 53 : 456-460, 2006

    19 Ramamurthy S, "Doxapram antagonism of meperidine-induced respiratory depression" 54 : 352-356, 1975

    20 Wu CC, "Doxapram and aminophylline on bispectral index under sevoflurane anaesthesia: a comparative study" 23 : 937-341, 2006

    21 Uehara H, "Doxapram accentuates white matter injury in neonatal rats following bilateral carotid artery occlusion" 281 : 191-194, 2000

    22 Gairola RL, "Antagonists of morphine-induced respiratory depression. A study in postoperative patients" 35 : 17-21, 1980

    23 Woolf CJ, "Analgesia and hyperalgesia produced in the rat by intrathecal naloxone" 189 : 593-597, 1980

    24 Rosenberg J, "Adverse events with continuous doxapram infusion on against late postoperative hypoxaemia" 50 : 191-194, 1996

    25 Ground RM, "Acute ventilatory changes during IV induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol in man" 59 : 1098-1102, 1987

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼