RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

    전신마취 유도 시 Esmolol과 Remifentanil이 기관내 삽관에 의한 심혈관 반응과 카테콜아민에 미치는 영향 = Comparing the effects of esmolol and remifentanil on the cardiovascular and catecholamine response to endotracheal intubation during the induction of general anesthesia

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104350121

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: Esmolol and remifentanil are widely used drugs that minimize the increase of the blood pressure and the heart rate in response to endotracheal intubation during the induction of anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of esmolol and remifentanil on the cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to endotracheal intubation.
    Methods: Sixty ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to three groups. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg and this was maintained with 2 vol% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The patients received 10 ml intravenous saline (control group), 1.5 mg/kg esmolol (esmolol group) or 1μg/kg remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min (remifentanil group) before intubation. The noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before induction (baseline), before intubation and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 minutes after intubation. The blood catecholamine level (epinephrine and norepinephrine) was measured before induction and at 1 and 5 minutes after intubation.
    Results: The systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures after endotracheal intubation were similar in the control and esmolol groups, but they were lower in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The heart rate after endotracheal intubation was lower in the remifentanil group than that in the esmolol group. No significant differences of the catecholamine responses to endotracheal intubation were observed among the three groups (P > 0.05).
    Conclusions: 1μg/kg remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min is more effective than 1.5 mg/kg esmolol for inhibiting the cardiovascular responses following endotrachal intubation during the induction of general anesthesia.
    번역하기

    Background: Esmolol and remifentanil are widely used drugs that minimize the increase of the blood pressure and the heart rate in response to endotracheal intubation during the induction of anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to compare the eff...

    Background: Esmolol and remifentanil are widely used drugs that minimize the increase of the blood pressure and the heart rate in response to endotracheal intubation during the induction of anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of esmolol and remifentanil on the cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to endotracheal intubation.
    Methods: Sixty ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to three groups. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg and this was maintained with 2 vol% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The patients received 10 ml intravenous saline (control group), 1.5 mg/kg esmolol (esmolol group) or 1μg/kg remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min (remifentanil group) before intubation. The noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before induction (baseline), before intubation and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 minutes after intubation. The blood catecholamine level (epinephrine and norepinephrine) was measured before induction and at 1 and 5 minutes after intubation.
    Results: The systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures after endotracheal intubation were similar in the control and esmolol groups, but they were lower in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The heart rate after endotracheal intubation was lower in the remifentanil group than that in the esmolol group. No significant differences of the catecholamine responses to endotracheal intubation were observed among the three groups (P > 0.05).
    Conclusions: 1μg/kg remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min is more effective than 1.5 mg/kg esmolol for inhibiting the cardiovascular responses following endotrachal intubation during the induction of general anesthesia.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: Esmolol and remifentanil are widely used drugs that minimize the increase of the blood pressure and the heart rate in response to endotracheal intubation during the induction of anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of esmolol and remifentanil on the cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to endotracheal intubation.
    Methods: Sixty ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to three groups. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg and this was maintained with 2 vol% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The patients received 10 ml intravenous saline (control group), 1.5 mg/kg esmolol (esmolol group) or 1μg/kg remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min (remifentanil group) before intubation. The noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before induction (baseline), before intubation and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 minutes after intubation. The blood catecholamine level (epinephrine and norepinephrine) was measured before induction and at 1 and 5 minutes after intubation.
    Results: The systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures after endotracheal intubation were similar in the control and esmolol groups, but they were lower in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The heart rate after endotracheal intubation was lower in the remifentanil group than that in the esmolol group. No significant differences of the catecholamine responses to endotracheal intubation were observed among the three groups (P > 0.05).
    Conclusions: 1μg/kg remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min is more effective than 1.5 mg/kg esmolol for inhibiting the cardiovascular responses following endotrachal intubation during the induction of general anesthesia.
    번역하기

    Background: Esmolol and remifentanil are widely used drugs that minimize the increase of the blood pressure and the heart rate in response to endotracheal intubation during the induction of anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to compare the eff...

    Background: Esmolol and remifentanil are widely used drugs that minimize the increase of the blood pressure and the heart rate in response to endotracheal intubation during the induction of anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of esmolol and remifentanil on the cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to endotracheal intubation.
    Methods: Sixty ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to three groups. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg and this was maintained with 2 vol% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The patients received 10 ml intravenous saline (control group), 1.5 mg/kg esmolol (esmolol group) or 1μg/kg remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min (remifentanil group) before intubation. The noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before induction (baseline), before intubation and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 minutes after intubation. The blood catecholamine level (epinephrine and norepinephrine) was measured before induction and at 1 and 5 minutes after intubation.
    Results: The systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures after endotracheal intubation were similar in the control and esmolol groups, but they were lower in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The heart rate after endotracheal intubation was lower in the remifentanil group than that in the esmolol group. No significant differences of the catecholamine responses to endotracheal intubation were observed among the three groups (P > 0.05).
    Conclusions: 1μg/kg remifentanil followed by an infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min is more effective than 1.5 mg/kg esmolol for inhibiting the cardiovascular responses following endotrachal intubation during the induction of general anesthesia.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Helfman SM, "Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation: lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol?" 72 : 482-486, 1991

    2 Thomson IR, "The haemodynamic response to intubation: a perspective" 36 : 367-369, 1989

    3 Stevens JB, "The haemodynamic effects of rocuronium and vecuronium are different under balanced anaesthesia" 41 : 502-505, 1997

    4 Hussain AM, "Sultan ST : Efficacy of fentanyl and esmolol in the prevention of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation" 15 : 454-457, 2005

    5 Kahl M, "Stress response to tracheal intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery: direct laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway" 18 : 275-280, 2004

    6 Derbyshire DR, "Smith G : Plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation" 55 : 855-860, 1983

    7 Rosow C, "Remifentanil: a unique opioid analgesic" 79 : 875-876, 1993

    8 Choi BI, "Remifentanil prevents withdrawal movements caused by intravenous injection of rocuronium" 30 : 211-216, 2008

    9 Glass PS, "Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an ultra-short-acting opioid: remifentanil" 77 : 1031-1040, 1993

    10 Gorczynski RJ, "Pharmacology of ASL 8052, a novel beta adrenergic receptor antagonist with an ultrashort duration of action" 5 : 668-677, 1983

    1 Helfman SM, "Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation: lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol?" 72 : 482-486, 1991

    2 Thomson IR, "The haemodynamic response to intubation: a perspective" 36 : 367-369, 1989

    3 Stevens JB, "The haemodynamic effects of rocuronium and vecuronium are different under balanced anaesthesia" 41 : 502-505, 1997

    4 Hussain AM, "Sultan ST : Efficacy of fentanyl and esmolol in the prevention of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation" 15 : 454-457, 2005

    5 Kahl M, "Stress response to tracheal intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery: direct laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway" 18 : 275-280, 2004

    6 Derbyshire DR, "Smith G : Plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation" 55 : 855-860, 1983

    7 Rosow C, "Remifentanil: a unique opioid analgesic" 79 : 875-876, 1993

    8 Choi BI, "Remifentanil prevents withdrawal movements caused by intravenous injection of rocuronium" 30 : 211-216, 2008

    9 Glass PS, "Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an ultra-short-acting opioid: remifentanil" 77 : 1031-1040, 1993

    10 Gorczynski RJ, "Pharmacology of ASL 8052, a novel beta adrenergic receptor antagonist with an ultrashort duration of action" 5 : 668-677, 1983

    11 Edwards ND, "Myocardial ischemia during tracheal intubation and extubation" 73 : 537-539, 1994

    12 Coley S, "Haemodynamic changes after induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation following propofol or thiopentone in patients of ASA grade I and III" 63 : 423-428, 1989

    13 Lindgren L, "Haemodynamic and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation: comparison between propofol and thiopentone" 70 : 306-310, 1993

    14 McAtamney D, "Evaluation of remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation" 53 : 1223-1227, 1998

    15 Gaubatz CL, "Evaluation of esmolol and fentanyl in controlling increases in heart rate and blood pressure during endotracheal intubation" 59 : 91-96, 1991

    16 Moffitt EA, "Effects of intubation on coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygenation" 32 : 105-111, 1985

    17 Ugur B, "Effects of esmolol, lidocaine and fentanyl on haemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation: a comparative study" 27 : 269-277, 2007

    18 Thompson JP, "Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation" 80 : 467-469, 1998

    19 Slogoff S, "Does perioperative myocardial ischemia lead to postoperative myocardial infarction?" 62 : 107-114, 1985

    20 Liu PL, "Covino BG: Esmolol for control of increases in heart rate and blood pressure during tracheal intubation after thiopentone and succinylcholine" 33 : 556-562, 1986

    21 Bruder N, "Consequences and prevention methods of hemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intratracheal intubation" 11 : 57-71, 1992

    22 Fox EJ, "Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation" 47 : 524-525, 1977

    23 Misiolek H, "Comparison of influence of thiopentone, propofol and midazolam on blood serum concentration of noradrenaline and cortisol in patients undergoing non-toxic struma operation" 6 : 319-324, 2000

    24 Russell WJ, "Changes in plasma catecholamine concentrations during endotracheal intubation" 53 : 837-839, 1981

    25 Chraemmer-Jorgensen B, "Catecholamine response to laryngosocpy and intubation. The influence of three different drug combinations commonly used for induction of anaesthesia" 47 : 750-756, 1992

    26 Wierda JM, "Cardiovascular effects of an intubating dose of rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1 in anaesthetized patients, paralysed with vecuronium" 78 : 586-587, 1997

    27 Menkhaus PG, "Cardiovascular effect of esmolol in anesthetized humans" 64 : 327-324, 1985

    28 Ebert TJ, "Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to rapid sequence induction and intubation in healthy patients with a single bolus of esmolol" 2 : 243-252, 1990

    29 Forbes AM, "Acute hypertension during induction of anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in normotensive man" 42 : 618-624, 1970

    30 Parnass SM, "A single bolus dose of esmolol in the prevention of intubation-induced tachycardia and hypertension in an ambulatory surgery unit" 2 : 232-237, 1990

    31 Glass PS, "A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil" 89 (89): S7-S14, 1999

    32 Sheppard S, "A bolus doses of esmolol attenuates tachycardia and hypertension after treacheal intubation" 37 : 202-205, 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼