東北亞海域에서의 海洋境界劃定에 관한 硏究 = A Study on the Maritime Delimitation of the North-East Asian Sea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Those countries located in the Northeast Asian sea have not agreed to the maritime security and boundaries and tried to set it saying their own claims. As the law of the sea develops, the principle of maritime security and boundaries has changed from natural extension to distance and as the development of science, related countries become able to calculate the reserves through researches. Also, those countries located in the Northeast Asian sea are trying to keep their national security based on stronger military power from a rapid economical growth.
Like this, the maritime security and boundaries is necessary through peaceful negotiations for the peace of the Northeast Asian sea as their concerns are getting complex on the sea as time goes.
For the maritime security and boundaries, there are two solutions; the first one is to solve through the machinery of law and the second one is to solve through conversation of related countries. Solving through the machinery of law is an extreme measure chosen when it cannot be solved through conversation and the agreement is to make the security and boundaries agreement through efforts of accomplishing their own demands.
Those countries located in the Northeast Asian sea area have negotiated for a long time by many people on the maritime security and boundaries and their results have been showed in the Joint Continental Shelf Agreement and the Fisheries Agreement. If any country tries to make the maritime security and boundaries ignoring agreements made by long time negotiations as in the above, it could cause more severe disputes as all the problems that each country claims will show up to the surface eventually.
In leading cases of the machinery of law, they respected past agreements made by related countries and made the maritime security and boundaries. In cases of both countries' agreements, they respected the existing agreements and decided the boundary by choosing the middle line that each country claimed. Most of all, the boundary agreement through agreements of both countries considered related countries' benefits fairly as much as possible.
Thus, the maritime security and boundaries agreement that countries around the Northeast Asian sea area should be made by a peaceful way and should be based on the agreement made by a long time negotiations.
As the conclusion, surrounding countries of the Northeast Asian sea should made the boundaries agreement for the sea that each country does not agree and the method should follow the recent trend of according to the agreement made by the decision of the International Court of Justice.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서 론 1
• 제1절 연구의 목적 1
• 제2절 연구의 내용과 방법 3
• 제2장 한국과 주변국의 해양경계획정 현황 5
• 제1절 한국의 해양경계획정 현황 5
• 제2절 한국과 일본 간의 해양경계획정 현황 6
• Ⅰ. 해양경계획정 원칙 6
• Ⅱ. 해양경계획정과 관련된 문제점 및 대응방안 8
• 제3절 한국과 중국 간의 해양경계획정 현황 21
• Ⅰ. 해양경계획정 원칙 21
• Ⅱ. 해양경계획정과 관련된 문제점 및 대응방안 23
• 제3장 해양경계획정과 관련한 최근 판례의 검토·분석 36
• 제1절 루마니아와 우크라이나 간의 해양경계획정에 대한 분쟁 36
• Ⅰ. 사실관계 36
• Ⅱ. 판결내용 38
• Ⅲ. 검토·분석 44
• 제2절 니카라과와 콜롬비아 간의 해양경계획정에 대한 분쟁 46
• Ⅰ. 사실관계 46
• Ⅱ. 판결내용 47
• Ⅲ. 검토·분석 56
• 제3절 방글라데시와 미얀마 간의 해양경계획정에 대한 분쟁 59
• Ⅰ. 사실관계 59
• Ⅱ. 판결내용 60
• Ⅲ. 검토·분석 68
• 제4절 페루와 칠레 간의 해양경계획정에 대한 분쟁 71
• Ⅰ. 사실관계 71
• Ⅱ. 합의된 해양경계선에 대한 판결 72
• Ⅲ. 해양경계선의 방향 및 결론 75
• Ⅳ. 검토·분석 78
• 제4장 양자협정을 통한 해양경계획정 분쟁의 해결 사례 81
• 제1절 중국과 베트남 간의 해양경계협정 81
• Ⅰ. 사실관계 81
• Ⅱ. 협정의 주요내용 82
• Ⅲ. 검토·분석 84
• 제2절 노르웨이와 러시아 간의 해양경계협정 90
• Ⅰ. 사실관계 90
• Ⅱ. 협정의 주요내용 92
• Ⅲ. 검토·분석 93
• 제5장 동북아해역에서의 해양경계획정 방안 96
• 제1절 사법기관을 통한 해양경계획정 해결 방안 96
• Ⅰ. 해양경계획정의 방법 96
• Ⅱ. 해양경계획정의 원칙 96
• Ⅲ. 관련 사정의 고려 98
• 제2절 양자협정을 통한 해양경계획정 해결 방안 103
• Ⅰ. 어업획정 103
• Ⅱ. 해양경계협정 105
• 제6장 결론 107
• 참고문헌 111