RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      청소년 여가활동 참여정도와 여가제약 요인에 관한 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100579473

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This research focused the extent of typical participating in leisure activities and difference analysis of typical leisure restriction factors on leisure activities, and analyzed the difference between the extent of participating in leisure activities...

      This research focused the extent of typical participating in leisure activities and difference analysis of typical leisure restriction factors on leisure activities, and analyzed the difference between the extent of participating in leisure activities and leisure restriction factors. The results of this study are as follows. First, in the extent of typical participating in leisure activities based on sex, there is difference in sports activities, and viewing and appreciation activities, respectively p<.001 and p<.05. On the other hand there is no difference in habitual and cultural activities, recreation and social meeting or service and religious activities. In relation to grades, the second grade students generally showed the highest numerical value(M=2.90), there is difference in habitual and cultural activities(p<.05), and there is no difference in sports activities, viewing and appreciation activities, or service and religious activities. In relation to the standard of living, the low class showed the highest numerical value (M=2.85), and there is no difference in the types of participating in leisure activities. In connection with monthly spending money, the students answered that they received spending money of more than 100 thousand Won which showed the highest numerical value (M=2.89), and there is no difference in types of participating in leisure activities at all. Second, in the difference analysis of typical leisure participating restriction factors based on sex, both male and female answered that the lack of sports facility, programs and times, and economical cost are restriction factors. There is statistically difference in relation to laziness (p<.05). In relation to grades, all of the first, second, and third grade answered that the lack of sports facility, programs and time, and economical cost are restriction factors. On the other hand, there are statistically difference in the lack of motivation and time, and the lack of sports facility and laziness, respectively p<.01 and p<.05. In connection with the standard of living, the low class showed the highest numerical value (M=3.17), and there is statistically difference in economical cost and the absence of companions, and the lack of motivation, respectively p<.001 and p<.05. On the other hand, there is no statistical difference in relation to the lack of facility, programs and time, and laziness. In relation to monthly spending money, More than 100 thousand Won was marked as the highest numerical value (M=3.10). There is statistically difference in economical cost and the absence of companions, p<.05. Third, in the difference analysis of the leisure restriction factors based on the extent of participating in leisure activities, in relation to all of the activities such as sports, habitual and cultural, viewing and appreciation activities, recreation and social meeting, and service and religious activities, the orders of strong restriction factors are as following: the lack of facility, programs and time, economical cost. There are statistically difference both facility and programs in sports activities p<.05), and economical cost in viewing and appreciation activities (p<.05).

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼