Relationship between gross primary production and environmental variables during drought season in South Korea = 가뭄 기간 총일차생산량과 환경 변수 간 상관관계 분석

국문 초록 (Abstract)

총일차생산량은 물 스트레스와 환경 변수에 의해 크게 영향을 받는다. 총일차생산량과 환경변수의 상관관계는 Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) 알고리즘과 process-based model에 적용되어 총일차생산량을 계산하는데 활용된다. 그러나 MODIS 알고리즘에서는 물 스트레스를 수증기압차이(vapor pressure deficit)로만 고려하고 있으며, process-based model에서도 제한된 변수만으로 물 스트레스를 표현하여 총일차생산량을 산출하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 에디 공분산 기법, MODIS 알고리즘, 그리고 Community Land Model 4 (CLM 4) 시뮬레이션 결과에서 얻어진 총일차생산량이 환경 변수와 가지는 상관관계를 평년과 가뭄연도를 대상으로 분석하였다. 물 스트레스를 대표하는 지수는 수증기압차이와 evaporative fraction (EF)가 사용되었다. 본 연구에서는 structural equation modeling (SEM)을 활용하여 환경 변수와 EF가 총일차생산량에 끼치는 영향을 수치화하여 평가하였다. SEM을 통해 상관성을 분석한 결과, 수증기압차이가 과소평가될 경우 MODIS 알고리즘과 CLM 4 시뮬레이션에서 생산된 총일차생산량이 수증기압차이로부터 받는 영향이 제한적임을 확인하였다. 에디 공분산 기법으로 산출한 총일차생산량의 상관성 분석 결과, 경작지에서는 관개작업으로 인해 수증기압차이가 총일차생산량에 끼치는 영향이 감소하였으나 MODIS와 CLM 4에서 산출된 총일차생산량 데이터는 이러한 관개작업의 영향을 설명하는데 제한적이었다. 본 연구결과는 MODIS와 CLM 4에서 산출된 총일차생산량의 특성을 이해하고 한계를 분석하는 연구에 도움을 줄 것으로 예상된다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정충길, "플럭스 타워 설치 유역을 대상으로 탄소수지 분석을 위한 위성영상자료기반의 CO2 정량화 연구" 한국농공학회 57 (57): 109-120, 2015

2 신형진, "관측자료와 RHESSys 모형을 이용한 산림유역의 생태수문 적용성 평가 -설마천유역을 대상으로-" 한국수자원학회 45 (45): 1293-1307, 2012

3 Grace, J, "Understanding and managing the global carbon cycle" 92 (92): 189-202, 2004

4 Pau, S., "Tropical forest temperature thresholds for gross primary productivity" 9 (9): e02311-, 2018

5 Tabari, H., "Temporal pattern of aridity index in Iran with considering precipitation and evapotranspiration trends" 33 (33): 396-409, 2013

6 Oleson, K. W., "Technical description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM)" National Center for Atmospheric Research 174-, 2010

7 Ambika, A. K., "Substantial decline in atmospheric aridity due to irrigation in India" 15 (15): 124060-, 2020

8 Grace, J. B., "Structural equation modeling and natural systems" Cambridge University Press 2006

9 Lasslop, G., "Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: Critical issues and global evaluation" 16 (16): 187-208, 2010

10 Fu, Z., "Sensitivity of gross primary productivity to climatic drivers during the summer drought of 2018 in Europe" 375 (375): 20190747-, 2020

11 Flanagan, L. B., "Seasonal nd interannual variation in carbon dioxide exchange and carbon balance in a northern temperate grassland" 8 (8): 599-615, 2002

12 Mao, J., "Remote sensing evaluation of CLM4 GPP for the period 2000-09" 25 (25): 5327-5342, 2012

13 Lawrence, D. M., "Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the community land model" 3 (3): 2011

14 Lloyd, J., "On the temperature dependence of soil respiration" 8 (8): 315-323, 1994

15 Hong, I., "National drought management framework for drought preparedness in Korea (lessons from the 2014-2015 drought)" 18 (18): 89-106, 2015

16 Malek-Madani, G., "Modeling gross primary production of Midwestern US maize and soybean croplands with satellite and gridded weather data" 12 (12): 3956-, 2020

17 Borges, C. V., "Medicinal Plants and Environmental Challenges" Springer 259-277, 2017

18 Williams, I. N., "Impacts of climate extremes on gross primary production under global warming" 9 (9): 094011-, 2014

19 Im, E. S., "Impact of potential large-scale irrigation on the West African monsoon and its dependence on location of irrigated area" 27 (27): 994-1009, 2014

20 Goodrich, J. P., "High vapor pressure deficit constrains GPP and the light response of NEE at a Southern Hemisphere bog" 203 : 54-63, 2015

21 Spielmann, F. M., "Gross primary productivity of four European ecosystems constrained by joint CO2 and COS flux measurements" 46 (46): 5284-5293, 2019

22 Yu, Z., "Global gross primary productivity and water use efficiency changes under drought stress" 12 (12): 014016-, 2017

23 Falge, E., "Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange" 107 (107): 43-69, 2001

24 Zhang, L., "Evaluation of the community land model simulated carbon and water fluxes against observations over ChinaFLUX sites" 226 : 174-185, 2016

25 Turner, D. P., "Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes" 102 (102): 282-292, 2006

26 Hudiburg, T. W., "Evaluation and improvement of the Community Land Model (CLM4) in Oregon forests" 10 (10): 453-470, 2013

27 Mu, Q., "Evaluating water stress controls on primary production in biogeochemical and remote sensing based models" 112 (112): 2007

28 Yu, T., "Estimation of global vegetation productivity from global land surface satellite data" 10 (10): 327-, 2018

29 Aubinet, M., "Eddy covariance: A practical guide to measurement and data analysis" Springer Science & Business Media 2012

30 Stocker, B. D., "Drought impacts on terrestrial primary production underestimated by satellite monitoring" 12 (12): 264-270, 2019

31 Wang, Y., "Direct and indirect effects of environmental factors on daily CO2 exchange in a rainfed maize cropland - A SEM analysis with 10 year observations" 242 : 107591-, 2019

32 Sheffield, J., "Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling" 19 (19): 3088-3111, 2006

33 Dong, J., "Comparison of four EVI-based models for estimating gross primary production of maize and soybean croplands and tallgrass prairie under severe drought" 162 : 154-168, 2015

34 Taylor, S. E., "Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight" 107 (107): 411-429, 2000

35 Wutzler, T., "Basic and extensible post-processing of eddy covariance flux data with REddyProc" 15 (15): 5015-5030, 2018

36 Huang, Y., "BESS-Rice: A remote sensing derived and biophysical process-based rice productivity simulation model" 256 : 253-269, 2018

37 Fan, Y., "Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM)in ecological studies: an updated review" 5 (5): 1-12, 2016