RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Retrospective Evaluations of Elementary and Secondary School Textbooks = Perspectives from Teachers of English

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99641962

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      With having recognized that there is lack of studies that take interest in the retrospective evaluations of textbooks, the present study takes separate interest in obtaining teachers’ opinions from post-use evaluations of textbooks. The 273 teacher-evaluators, who consisted of in-service and pre-service teachers from different parts of the country, were asked to respond to the questionnaire regarding their post-use evaluations of textbooks by asking them to rate the importance of 25 evaluation criteria that took analytic and holistic approaches. The results indicated that, amid situational constraints, teachers valued materials that are topically interesting and motivating, linguistically accurate and grammatical, appropriate to the students’ cognitive and affective levels, and balanced in the use of four language skills. Regarding different school level, teachers at secondary schools (i.e., middle and high schools) in comparison to those at the elementary school level generally identified the criteria to be relatively more important for what textbooks should provide. In order to bring optimal learning benefits to L2 learners, the study underscores the value of retrospective evaluations for the identification of problems that may transpire from the textbook or/and situational constraints.
      번역하기

      With having recognized that there is lack of studies that take interest in the retrospective evaluations of textbooks, the present study takes separate interest in obtaining teachers’ opinions from post-use evaluations of textbooks. The 273 teacher-...

      With having recognized that there is lack of studies that take interest in the retrospective evaluations of textbooks, the present study takes separate interest in obtaining teachers’ opinions from post-use evaluations of textbooks. The 273 teacher-evaluators, who consisted of in-service and pre-service teachers from different parts of the country, were asked to respond to the questionnaire regarding their post-use evaluations of textbooks by asking them to rate the importance of 25 evaluation criteria that took analytic and holistic approaches. The results indicated that, amid situational constraints, teachers valued materials that are topically interesting and motivating, linguistically accurate and grammatical, appropriate to the students’ cognitive and affective levels, and balanced in the use of four language skills. Regarding different school level, teachers at secondary schools (i.e., middle and high schools) in comparison to those at the elementary school level generally identified the criteria to be relatively more important for what textbooks should provide. In order to bring optimal learning benefits to L2 learners, the study underscores the value of retrospective evaluations for the identification of problems that may transpire from the textbook or/and situational constraints.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Background
      • Ⅲ. Method
      • Ⅳ. Results
      • Ⅴ. Conclusion and Recommendations
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Background
      • Ⅲ. Method
      • Ⅳ. Results
      • Ⅴ. Conclusion and Recommendations
      • References
      • Appendix : Questionnaire on Post-use Evaluation of Nationally-authorized Textbooks
      • Author’s Biodata
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼