RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      What Did They Mean by “Calculation Principles”?: Revisiting Argumentative Styles in Late Ming to Mid-Qing Chinese Mathematics = What Did They Mean by “Calculation Principles”?: Revisiting Argumentative Styles in Late Ming to Mid-Qing Chinese Mathematics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102068741

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article discusses the influence that two versions of the Elements had in Ming and Qing China as well as Chinese scholars` efforts to “integrate” (huitong 會通) Western and Chinese mathematics into a unified system in terms of argumentative styles in mathematics. Although much high praise was given to the axiomatic-de-ductive system of Euclid`s Elements, numerical arguments and problem-solving re-main important traits in the works of Chinese scholars. The compilation of the Shuli jingyun 數理精蘊 and the inclusion of another version of the Elements in it again prompted East Asian mathematicians to reflect more upon their methods of argu-mentation, and later scholars began to write texts whose arguments are more abstract than numerical. This paper presents examples taken from the works of several rep-resentative scholars from the late Ming to the mid-Qing periods to argue that their efforts of huitong produced argumentative styles that are a combination of both Chi-nese and Western approaches, and that there was a trend of moving from concrete calculations to general arguments in mathematical texts throughout the course of history. Finally, the authors conclude that what 17<sup>th</sup> and 18<sup>th</sup> century Chinese math-ematicians meant by “calculation principles” (suanli 算理) was never the kind of pure deduction in the Euclidean manner, but a combination of induction and deduc-tion, with the help of intuition, for the purpose of problem-solving.
      번역하기

      This article discusses the influence that two versions of the Elements had in Ming and Qing China as well as Chinese scholars` efforts to “integrate” (huitong 會通) Western and Chinese mathematics into a unified system in terms of argumentative ...

      This article discusses the influence that two versions of the Elements had in Ming and Qing China as well as Chinese scholars` efforts to “integrate” (huitong 會通) Western and Chinese mathematics into a unified system in terms of argumentative styles in mathematics. Although much high praise was given to the axiomatic-de-ductive system of Euclid`s Elements, numerical arguments and problem-solving re-main important traits in the works of Chinese scholars. The compilation of the Shuli jingyun 數理精蘊 and the inclusion of another version of the Elements in it again prompted East Asian mathematicians to reflect more upon their methods of argu-mentation, and later scholars began to write texts whose arguments are more abstract than numerical. This paper presents examples taken from the works of several rep-resentative scholars from the late Ming to the mid-Qing periods to argue that their efforts of huitong produced argumentative styles that are a combination of both Chi-nese and Western approaches, and that there was a trend of moving from concrete calculations to general arguments in mathematical texts throughout the course of history. Finally, the authors conclude that what 17<sup>th</sup> and 18<sup>th</sup> century Chinese math-ematicians meant by “calculation principles” (suanli 算理) was never the kind of pure deduction in the Euclidean manner, but a combination of induction and deduc-tion, with the help of intuition, for the purpose of problem-solving.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 洪萬生, "談天三友" Mingwen shuju 144-, 1993

      2 程和欽, "清代算學家杜知耕及其《數學鑰》之研究" National Taiwan Normal University 2006

      3 李儼, "海島算経新注" Shanghai kexue jishu chubanshe 1963

      4 Mei Rongzhao, "歐幾里德原本的傳入和對我國明清數學的影響" Ming-Qing shuxueshi lunwenji 53-83,

      5 梅榮照, "明清數學史論文集" Jiansu jiaoyu chubanshe 1-20, 1990

      6 Wang Yusheng, "中國科學技術典籍通匯: 數學篇" Henan Education Press 1145-1150, 1993

      7 田淼, "中國數學的西化歷程" Shandong Education Press 26-38, 2003

      8 洪萬生, "中國史新論: 科技與中國分冊" Lianjing chubanshe 353-421, 2010

      9 Catherine Jami, "“European Science in China” or “Western Learning”?: Representations of Cross-Cultural Transmission, 1600-1800" 12 (12): 413-434, 1999

      10 Suan shu shu, "‘Writings on Reckoning’: A Translation of a Chinese Mathematical Collection of the Second Century BC, with Explanatory Commentary, and an Edition of the Chinese Text" Needham Research Institute 2004

      1 洪萬生, "談天三友" Mingwen shuju 144-, 1993

      2 程和欽, "清代算學家杜知耕及其《數學鑰》之研究" National Taiwan Normal University 2006

      3 李儼, "海島算経新注" Shanghai kexue jishu chubanshe 1963

      4 Mei Rongzhao, "歐幾里德原本的傳入和對我國明清數學的影響" Ming-Qing shuxueshi lunwenji 53-83,

      5 梅榮照, "明清數學史論文集" Jiansu jiaoyu chubanshe 1-20, 1990

      6 Wang Yusheng, "中國科學技術典籍通匯: 數學篇" Henan Education Press 1145-1150, 1993

      7 田淼, "中國數學的西化歷程" Shandong Education Press 26-38, 2003

      8 洪萬生, "中國史新論: 科技與中國分冊" Lianjing chubanshe 353-421, 2010

      9 Catherine Jami, "“European Science in China” or “Western Learning”?: Representations of Cross-Cultural Transmission, 1600-1800" 12 (12): 413-434, 1999

      10 Suan shu shu, "‘Writings on Reckoning’: A Translation of a Chinese Mathematical Collection of the Second Century BC, with Explanatory Commentary, and an Edition of the Chinese Text" Needham Research Institute 2004

      11 L. Burton, "Why Is Intuition So Important to Mathematicians but Missing from Mathematics Education?" 19 (19): 27-32, 1999

      12 Catherine Jami, "Western Influence and Chinese Tradition in an Eighteenth-Century Chinese Mathematical Work" 15 : 311-331, 1988

      13 Catherine Jami, "Western Humanistic Culture Presented to China by Jesuit Missionaries (XVII-XVIII centuries)" Institutum Historicum S. I 175-199, 1996

      14 Reviel Netz, "The Shaping of Deduc-tion in Greek Mathematics : A Study in Cognitive History" Cambridge University Press 1999

      15 Catherine Jami, "The Emperor’s New Mathematics: Western Learning and Imperial Authority during the Kangxi Reign (1662-1722)" Oxford University Press 173-176, 2012

      16 Judith V. Grabiner, "The Centrality of Mathematics in the History of Western Thought" 61 (61): 220-230, 1988

      17 Hashimoto Keizo, "Statecraft and Intellec-tual Renewal in Late Ming China: The Cross-Cultural Synthesis of Xu Guangqi (1562-1633)" Brill 263-278, 2001

      18 Chu Pingyi, "Scientific Dispute in the Imperial Court: The 1664 Calendar Case" 14 : 7-34, 1997

      19 Morris Kline, "Mathematics in Western Culture" Oxford University Press 1953

      20 James Hawthorne, "Inductive Logic"

      21 Karine Chemla, "Generality above Abstraction: The General Expressed in Terms of the Paradig-matic in Mathematics in Ancient China" 16 (16): 413-458, 2003

      22 Jami, "From Clavius to Pardies"

      23 Peter Engelfriet, "Euclid in China : The Genesis of the First Chinese Translation of Euclid's Ele-ments in 1607 and Its Reception up to 1723" Brill 1998

      24 Joshua Schechter, "Deductive Reasoning"

      25 Huang Yi-Long, "Court Divination and Christianity in the K’ang-hsi Era" 10 : 1-20, 1991

      26 Li Yan, "Chinese Mathematics: A Concise History" Clarendon Press 226-230, 1987

      27 Christopher Cullen, "Astronomy and Mathematics in Ancient China : The Zhou Bi Suan Jing" Cambridge University Press 77-80, 1996

      28 Donald B. Wagner, "An Early Chinese Derivation of the Volume of a Pyramid" 6 : 164-188, 1979

      29 Jean-Claude Martzloff, "A History of Chinese Mathematics" Springer 105-106, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : HANGUK KWAHAK-SA HAKHOE-JI -> The Korean Journal for the History of Science KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.42 0.42 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.47 0.697 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼