RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

    Can Robotic Gastrectomy Surpass Laparoscopic Gastrectomy by Acquiring Long-Term Experience? A Propensity Score Analysis of a 7-Year Experience at a Single Institution

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103554165

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: It is hypothesized that robotic gastrectomy may surpass laparoscopic gastrectomy after the operators acquire long-term experience and skills in the manipulation of robotic arms. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term learning curve of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG).
    Materials and Methods: From October 2008 to December 2015, patients who underwent LDG (n=809) were matched to patients who underwent RDG (n=232) at a 1:1 ratio, by using a propensity score matching method after stratification for the operative year. The surgical outcomes, such as trends of operative time, blood loss, and complication rate, were compared between the two groups.
    Results: The RDG group showed a longer operative time (171.3 minutes vs. 147.6 minutes, P<0.001) but less estimated blood loss (77.6 ml vs. 116.6 ml, P<0.001). The complication rate and postoperative recovery did not differ between the two groups. The RDG group showed a longer operative time and similar estimated blood loss compared with the LDG group after 5 years of experience (operative time: 159.2 minutes vs. 136.0 minutes in 2015, P=0.003; estimated blood loss: 72.9 ml vs. 78.1 ml in 2015, P=0.793).
    Conclusions: In terms of short-term surgical outcomes, RDG may not surpass LDG after a long-term experience with the technique.
    번역하기

    Purpose: It is hypothesized that robotic gastrectomy may surpass laparoscopic gastrectomy after the operators acquire long-term experience and skills in the manipulation of robotic arms. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term learning curve of rob...

    Purpose: It is hypothesized that robotic gastrectomy may surpass laparoscopic gastrectomy after the operators acquire long-term experience and skills in the manipulation of robotic arms. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term learning curve of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG).
    Materials and Methods: From October 2008 to December 2015, patients who underwent LDG (n=809) were matched to patients who underwent RDG (n=232) at a 1:1 ratio, by using a propensity score matching method after stratification for the operative year. The surgical outcomes, such as trends of operative time, blood loss, and complication rate, were compared between the two groups.
    Results: The RDG group showed a longer operative time (171.3 minutes vs. 147.6 minutes, P<0.001) but less estimated blood loss (77.6 ml vs. 116.6 ml, P<0.001). The complication rate and postoperative recovery did not differ between the two groups. The RDG group showed a longer operative time and similar estimated blood loss compared with the LDG group after 5 years of experience (operative time: 159.2 minutes vs. 136.0 minutes in 2015, P=0.003; estimated blood loss: 72.9 ml vs. 78.1 ml in 2015, P=0.793).
    Conclusions: In terms of short-term surgical outcomes, RDG may not surpass LDG after a long-term experience with the technique.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Kim YW, "Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer" 30 : 1547-1552, 2016

    2 Son T, "Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer : comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure" 28 : 2606-2615, 2014

    3 Kim HI, "Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy" 40 : 1346-1354, 2014

    4 Park SS, "Rapid adaptation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by experienced laparoscopic surgeons" 26 : 60-67, 2012

    5 Suda K, "Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach : a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study" 29 : 673-685, 2015

    6 Kozo Kataoka, "Non-Randomized Confirmatory Trial of Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy and Proximal Gastrectomy with Nodal Dissection for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1401" 대한위암학회 16 (16): 93-97, 2016

    7 Kim HI, "Multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma" 263 : 103-109, 2016

    8 Hu Y, "Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer : a randomized controlled trial" 34 : 1350-1357, 2016

    9 Kim HH, "Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial)" 251 : 417-420, 2010

    10 Kim HH, "Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study" 32 : 627-633, 2014

    1 Kim YW, "Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer" 30 : 1547-1552, 2016

    2 Son T, "Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer : comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure" 28 : 2606-2615, 2014

    3 Kim HI, "Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy" 40 : 1346-1354, 2014

    4 Park SS, "Rapid adaptation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by experienced laparoscopic surgeons" 26 : 60-67, 2012

    5 Suda K, "Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach : a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study" 29 : 673-685, 2015

    6 Kozo Kataoka, "Non-Randomized Confirmatory Trial of Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy and Proximal Gastrectomy with Nodal Dissection for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1401" 대한위암학회 16 (16): 93-97, 2016

    7 Kim HI, "Multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma" 263 : 103-109, 2016

    8 Hu Y, "Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer : a randomized controlled trial" 34 : 1350-1357, 2016

    9 Kim HH, "Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial)" 251 : 417-420, 2010

    10 Kim HH, "Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study" 32 : 627-633, 2014

    11 Kim YW, "Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer : result of a randomized controlled trial(COACT 0301)" 27 : 4267-4276, 2013

    12 Kim W, "Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer : short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial(KLASS-01)" 263 : 28-35, 2016

    13 Zhou J, "Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer" 111 : 760-767, 2015

    14 Lee JH, "A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer : early results" 19 : 168-173, 2005

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2017-05-01 등재 SCIE 등재 (기타) KCI등재
    2015-07-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한위암학회지 -> Journal of Gastric Cancer KCI등재
    2015-07-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Gastric Cancer Association -> Journal of Gastric Cancer KCI등재
    2013-11-01 등재 SCOPUS 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.46 0.24 0.35
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.31 0.37 0.461 0.05
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼