조선 전기 강호 시조의 전개 국면 = ‘조월경운’과 ‘치군택민’의 개념을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper investigates the literary works of Maeng Sa-sung. Lee Hyun-bo, Lee Hyuang, Lee Ee and Kyuen He-moon that formed the series of Gangho sijo of the early Chosun, and explores the identity and individual differences of so-called 'Ganghogado' works.
Previous discussions about' 'Ganghogado' focused on the philosophical and aesthetic aspects of the pursuit of Confucian Tao, rather than the quotidian aspects of the sijo genre and real-life reflections. Such approaches were based on the romanticism in that they see the reality and ideology of confucianists of the time as philosophical notions. Thus, instead of conceptually interpreting Gangho sijo as the pursuit of cofucian tao in harmony with the nature, this paper views Gangho sijo as the tails about the actual problems the confucianists of the day faced.
In this original perspective, in place of the previously studied terms such as 'Nature-a place of seclusion-' and 'The mundane world', this paper probes how the authors present the terms commonly used by the early Chosun's confucianists such as 'Jowalkyongwun' and 'Chiguntaekmin' according to the authors' own situations.
Confucianists of the early Chosun were not contemplating about the problem of choice between 'Jowalkyongwun' and 'Chiguntaekmin' in Gangho sijo. They resided in the ideal world of 'Jowalkyongwun,' but continually mulled over whether they should perform the obligatory 'Chiguntaekmin'.
Consequently, many authors sang about the similar themes: Maeng Sa-sung about the harmony of 'Chiguntaekmin' and his stay in the countryside; Lee Hyun-bo about escaping from 'Chiguntaskmin'; Kyuen He-moon about his anguish due to failing to carry out Chiguntaekmin' ; Lee Hyuang and Lee Ee about scholarship as the alternate to 'Chiguntaekmin.'
In other words, the subject of the early Chosun's Gangho sijo writers were 'Jowalkyongwun' and 'Chiguntaekmin.' The fact that they endlessly pondered on 'Chiguntaekmin' while living lives of Jowalkyongwun' shows the inner conflicts of the Chosun's confucianists about acting according to their ideology. Gangho sijo depicts the real-life agony that lies behind the aesthetic aspect of pursuing the beauty of nature.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조윤제, "한국시가사강" 을유문화사 210-218, 1954

2 김흥규, "한국문학의 이해" 민음사 35-46, 1986

3 조윤제, "한국문학사" 동국문화사 160-168, 1963

4 국, "퇴계집" 민족문화추진회 1968

5 이민홍, "조선 중기 시가의 이념과 미의식" 성대출판부 44-94, 1993

6 김대행, "이이론 (고시조작가론)" 백산출판사 148-164, 1986

7 국, "율곡집" 민족문화추진회 1968

8 "악장가사"

9 이민홍, "사림파문학의 연구" 형설출판사 1985

10 양희찬, "맹사성 <강호사시가>의 짜임새" 한국시조학회 21 : 143-162, 2004

11 조규익, "농암 이현보의 가곡" 연민학회 2 : 87-113, 1994

12 최진원, "고전시가의 형상성" 성균관대학교 출판부 79-109, 1988

13 김흥규, "강호자연과 정치현실 (세계의 문학 19)" 민음사 389-409,

14 신영명, "강호시조 연구사의 행방 (조선 중기 시가와 자연)" 태학사 397-415, 2002

15 김창원, "강호시가의 미학적 탐구" 보고사 125-140, 2004

16 최진원, "강호가도연구" 성균관대학교 1974

17 "靑丘永言(珍本)"

18 이황, "陶山全書 3권" 易東書院記 280-, 1980

19 "聾巖先生文集"

20 "樂學拾零"

21 "松巖續集"

22 "『해동잡록』, 한국고전번역원 역"

23 "『한국문집총간』, 한국고전번역원"

24 "『학봉집』, 한국고전번역원 역"

25 "『필원잡기』, 한국고전번역원 역"

26 "『조선왕조실록』, 국사편찬위원회 역"

27 성기옥, "<도산십이곡>의 구조와 의미<도산십이곡>의 구조와 의미" 한국시가학회 11 : 8-230, 2002

28 이상원, "<고산구곡가>의 이중구조와 언어미" 고대민족문화연구소 33 : 277-296, 2000

29 김명준, "<강호사시가(江湖四時歌)>의 창작 시기와 세계상" 한국고시가문학회 15 (15): 75-98, 2005

30 김용철, "16세기 강호시조의 낭만적 성격" 우리어문학회 19 : 51-66, 2002

31 신영명, "16세기 강호 시조의 연구" 고려대학교 1990

32 김흥규, "16 17세기 강호시조의 변모와 전가시조의 형성" 고려대학교 국어국문학 연구회 35 : 217-242, 1996