RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      The relative analgesic value of a femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107062470

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Multiple comparative studies report that adductor canal blocks provide similar pain relief to femoral nerve blocks following total knee arthroplasty. However, adductor canal blockade fails to anesthetize several important femoral nerve bra...

      Background: Multiple comparative studies report that adductor canal blocks provide similar pain relief to femoral nerve blocks following total knee arthroplasty. However, adductor canal blockade fails to anesthetize several important femoral nerve branches that contribute to knee innervation. We sought to clarify this anatomic discrepancy by performing both blocks in sequence, using patients as their own controls. We hypothesized that patients would experience additional pain relief following a superimposed femoral nerve block, demonstrating that these techniques are not equivalent.
      Methods: Sixteen patients received continuous adductor canal block before undergoing knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia. In the recovery room, patients reported their pain score on a numeric scale of 0–10. Once a patient reached a score of five or greater, he/she was randomized to receive an additional femoral nerve block using 2% chloroprocaine or saline sham, and pain scores recorded every 5 min for 30 min. Patients received opioid rescue as needed. Anesthesiologists performing and assessing block efficacy were blinded to group allocation.
      Results: Patients randomized to chloroprocaine versus saline reported significantly improved median pain scores 30 min after the femoral block (2.0 vs. 5.5, P < 0.001). Patients receiving chloroprocaine also required significantly fewer morphine equivalents during the 30 min post-femoral block (1.0 vs. 4.5 mg, P = 0.032).
      Conclusions: Adductor canal block is a useful technique for postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty, but it does not provide equivalent analgesic efficacy to femoral nerve block. Future studies comparing efficacy between various block sites along the thigh are warranted.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Runge C, "The spread of ultrasound-guided injectate from the adductor canal to the genicular branch of the posterior obturator nerve and the popliteal plexus : a cadaveric study" 42 : 725-730, 2017

      2 Elkassabany NM, "The risk of falls after total knee arthroplasty with the use of a femoral nerve block versus an adductor canal block : a double-blinded randomized controlled study" 122 : 1696-1703, 2016

      3 Burckett-St Laurant D, "The nerves of the adductor canal and the innervation of the knee : an anatomic study" 41 : 321-327, 2016

      4 Maralcan G, "The innervation of patella : anatomical and clinical study" 27 : 331-335, 2005

      5 Kwofie MK, "The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk : a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers" 38 : 321-325, 2013

      6 Grevstad U, "The effect of local anesthetic volume within the adductor canal on quadriceps femoris function evaluated by electromyography" 123 : 493-500, 2016

      7 Liu HW, "Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty : a meta-analysis comparing the midvastus and subvastus to the medial peripatellar approach" 29 : 2298-2304, 2014

      8 Memtsoudis SG, "Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement" 39 : 673-680, 2015

      9 Peter Brooks, "Seven Cuts to the Perfect Total Knee" SLACK, Inc 32 (32): 680-682, 2009

      10 Brennan PT, "Rehabilitation outcomes for total knee arthroplasties : continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block" 9 : 2151458518756190-, 2018

      1 Runge C, "The spread of ultrasound-guided injectate from the adductor canal to the genicular branch of the posterior obturator nerve and the popliteal plexus : a cadaveric study" 42 : 725-730, 2017

      2 Elkassabany NM, "The risk of falls after total knee arthroplasty with the use of a femoral nerve block versus an adductor canal block : a double-blinded randomized controlled study" 122 : 1696-1703, 2016

      3 Burckett-St Laurant D, "The nerves of the adductor canal and the innervation of the knee : an anatomic study" 41 : 321-327, 2016

      4 Maralcan G, "The innervation of patella : anatomical and clinical study" 27 : 331-335, 2005

      5 Kwofie MK, "The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk : a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers" 38 : 321-325, 2013

      6 Grevstad U, "The effect of local anesthetic volume within the adductor canal on quadriceps femoris function evaluated by electromyography" 123 : 493-500, 2016

      7 Liu HW, "Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty : a meta-analysis comparing the midvastus and subvastus to the medial peripatellar approach" 29 : 2298-2304, 2014

      8 Memtsoudis SG, "Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement" 39 : 673-680, 2015

      9 Peter Brooks, "Seven Cuts to the Perfect Total Knee" SLACK, Inc 32 (32): 680-682, 2009

      10 Brennan PT, "Rehabilitation outcomes for total knee arthroplasties : continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block" 9 : 2151458518756190-, 2018

      11 Bauer MC, "Regional analgesia techniques for total knee replacement" 27 : 501-506, 2014

      12 Runner RP, "Quadriceps strength deficits after a femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a prospective, single-blinded, randomized trial" 6 : 2325967118797990-, 2018

      13 Agostinho M, "No relationships between the within-subjects’ variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports" 13 : 774-, 2019

      14 Sinha SK, "New blocks for the same old joints" 31 : 630-635, 2018

      15 Shah NA, "Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial" 29 : 2224-2229, 2014

      16 Kuang MJ, "Is adductor canal block better than femoral nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty? A GRADE analysis of the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis" 32 : 3238-3248, 2017

      17 Gungor S, "Incidence and risk factors for development of persistent postsurgical pain following total knee arthroplasty : a retrospective cohort study" 98 : e16450-, 2019

      18 Danoff JR, "How much pain is significant? Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the visual analog scale for pain after total joint arthroplasty" 33 : S71-S75, 2018

      19 Grevstad U, "Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty" 40 : 3-10, 2015

      20 Hanson NA, "Continuous ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty : a randomized, double-blind trial" 118 : 1370-1377, 2014

      21 Monahan AM, "Continuous adductor canal blocks: does varying local anesthetic delivery method (automatic repeated bolus doses versus continuous basal infusion) influence cutaneous analgesia and quadriceps femoris strength? a randomized, double-masked, controlled, split-body volunteer study" 122 : 1681-1688, 2016

      22 Wiesmann T, "Continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty for mobilisation capability and pain treatment : a randomised and blinded clinical trial" 136 : 397-406, 2016

      23 Meier AW, "Comparison of continuous proximal versus distal adductor canal blocks for total knee arthroplasty : a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial" 43 : 36-42, 2018

      24 Farrar JT, "Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures : a validation study" 25 : 406-411, 2003

      25 Hannon CP, "Anesthesia and analgesia practices in total joint arthroplasty : a survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Membership" 34 : 2872-2877, 2019

      26 Tran J, "Anatomical study of the innervation of anterior knee joint capsule : implication for image-guided intervention" 43 : 407-414, 2018

      27 Anastase DM, "Analgesic techniques in hip and knee arthroplasty : from the daily practice to evidence-based medicine" 2014 : 569319-, 2014

      28 Schnabel A, "Adductor canal blocks for postoperative pain treatment in adults undergoing knee surgery" 2019 : CD012262-, 2019

      29 Masaracchia MM, "Adductor canal blocks : changing practice patterns and associated quality profile" 61 : 224-231, 2017

      30 Kim DH, "Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty" 120 : 540-550, 2014

      31 Jæger P, "Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty : a randomized, double-blind study" 38 : 526-532, 2013

      32 Jæger P, "Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength" 118 : 409-415, 2013

      33 Li D, "Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 40 : 925-933, 2016

      34 Egeler C, "Adductor canal block is useful but does not achieve a complete block of the knee" 39 : 81-82, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼