RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    《종교사무조례》 수정초안에 나타난 중국 종교정책 변화와 로잔운동의 관계성 고찰 = A Study on the Relationship between the Change of Religion Policy in the Regulations on Religious Affairs Draft Revisions(Deliberation Draft) in China and Lausanne Movement

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103303304

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Lausanne Movement began in 1974 with the first International Congress on World Evangelization as part of the evangelical camp`s effort to overcome the crisis of the 1960s when the concept of missions was heading towards polar extremes of evangelism and social participation depending on one`s theological tendency. Through the Lausanne II in Manila in 1989 and the Cape Town 2010, the Lausanne Movement has brought together the evangelical camps and has played an important role in establishing theological foundations and practical directions for world missions such as awakening the importance of overseas missions, summarizing theological grounds for world evangelization, etc.
    Although the Lausanne Movement plays an important role of the evangelical camp in encountering the theology of missions of the ecumenical camp for the purpose of world missions, it is still not free from the evangelical camps` understanding and evaluation that communist proliferation would be an obstacle to the preaching of the gospel. At Cape Town 2010, around 200 delegations of the Chinese church from China were not able to attend the Congress due to the government`s refusal to grant permission to the delegation to travel abroad. As a result, the meeting between the Lausanne Movement and the Chinese church continues to remain as a difficult task to solve.
    This study was conducted with the premise that in order for the Lausanne Movement to meet with the Chinese church, a thorough understanding of the religious policies implemented by China must precede the meeting. The Chinese government, with its legislation on religious policy that prioritizes solving religious problems in the country, recently announced Religious Affairs Draft Revisions (Deliberation Draft). Since the Religious Affairs Draft Revisions is a legal basis for China`s religious policies, the analysis of the Deliberation Draft is an important indicator of future religious policy in China.
    By analyzing the contents of the Deliberation Draft, we can detect several important changes. First, the Chinese government will have the legal basis to more thoroughly control the Chinese church`s contact with foreign groups. Second, the Chinese government`s control over religious activities has expanded beyond domestic to abroad. Third, the Chinese government has extended its offline control of religious activities from offline to online. In addition, the Chinese government, which has implemented a dual religious policy that guarantees freedom of religion while strictly controlling religious activities, has significantly strengthened regulations preventing the possibility that the religious community will reinvest religious assets accumulated as a result of economic development and quantitative growth of its members for further growth of their religion. Therefore, going forward the Chinese government is expected to implement a strict control policy based on legal grounds.
    However, the religious policy of modern China has already been fundamentally changed. In implementing the Open Door Policy in 1978, China reinterpreted socialism and proclaimed the so-called “socialism with Chinese characteristics”. As a result, it has abandoned the traditional religious policy to forcibly annihilate religion and started to strongly promote freedom of religion policy to focus all the capabilities of the religious system on socialist development. In a socialist ideological system, religion cannot be left to exist. However, from a unified frontline strategy perspective it regards religion as a social phenomenon and recognizes the reality that religion exists in socialist society.
    The Lausanne Movement places highest priority on overcoming obstacles that hinder world evangelization. The existence of the communist camp is one of the major obstacles. However, it is also the target of companion for partnership to seek after for world evangelization. For the Chinese government, building a socialist society is its top priority. In modern China, religion, especially Western religion of Christianity, is becoming an important power in the development of socialism. If this situation can be understood prospectively, the Lausanne movement has full potential to establish a companion partnership with the Chinese church.
    번역하기

    The Lausanne Movement began in 1974 with the first International Congress on World Evangelization as part of the evangelical camp`s effort to overcome the crisis of the 1960s when the concept of missions was heading towards polar extremes of evangel...

    The Lausanne Movement began in 1974 with the first International Congress on World Evangelization as part of the evangelical camp`s effort to overcome the crisis of the 1960s when the concept of missions was heading towards polar extremes of evangelism and social participation depending on one`s theological tendency. Through the Lausanne II in Manila in 1989 and the Cape Town 2010, the Lausanne Movement has brought together the evangelical camps and has played an important role in establishing theological foundations and practical directions for world missions such as awakening the importance of overseas missions, summarizing theological grounds for world evangelization, etc.
    Although the Lausanne Movement plays an important role of the evangelical camp in encountering the theology of missions of the ecumenical camp for the purpose of world missions, it is still not free from the evangelical camps` understanding and evaluation that communist proliferation would be an obstacle to the preaching of the gospel. At Cape Town 2010, around 200 delegations of the Chinese church from China were not able to attend the Congress due to the government`s refusal to grant permission to the delegation to travel abroad. As a result, the meeting between the Lausanne Movement and the Chinese church continues to remain as a difficult task to solve.
    This study was conducted with the premise that in order for the Lausanne Movement to meet with the Chinese church, a thorough understanding of the religious policies implemented by China must precede the meeting. The Chinese government, with its legislation on religious policy that prioritizes solving religious problems in the country, recently announced Religious Affairs Draft Revisions (Deliberation Draft). Since the Religious Affairs Draft Revisions is a legal basis for China`s religious policies, the analysis of the Deliberation Draft is an important indicator of future religious policy in China.
    By analyzing the contents of the Deliberation Draft, we can detect several important changes. First, the Chinese government will have the legal basis to more thoroughly control the Chinese church`s contact with foreign groups. Second, the Chinese government`s control over religious activities has expanded beyond domestic to abroad. Third, the Chinese government has extended its offline control of religious activities from offline to online. In addition, the Chinese government, which has implemented a dual religious policy that guarantees freedom of religion while strictly controlling religious activities, has significantly strengthened regulations preventing the possibility that the religious community will reinvest religious assets accumulated as a result of economic development and quantitative growth of its members for further growth of their religion. Therefore, going forward the Chinese government is expected to implement a strict control policy based on legal grounds.
    However, the religious policy of modern China has already been fundamentally changed. In implementing the Open Door Policy in 1978, China reinterpreted socialism and proclaimed the so-called “socialism with Chinese characteristics”. As a result, it has abandoned the traditional religious policy to forcibly annihilate religion and started to strongly promote freedom of religion policy to focus all the capabilities of the religious system on socialist development. In a socialist ideological system, religion cannot be left to exist. However, from a unified frontline strategy perspective it regards religion as a social phenomenon and recognizes the reality that religion exists in socialist society.
    The Lausanne Movement places highest priority on overcoming obstacles that hinder world evangelization. The existence of the communist camp is one of the major obstacles. However, it is also the target of companion for partnership to seek after for world evangelization. For the Chinese government, building a socialist society is its top priority. In modern China, religion, especially Western religion of Christianity, is becoming an important power in the development of socialism. If this situation can be understood prospectively, the Lausanne movement has full potential to establish a companion partnership with the Chinese church.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 왕쭤안, "중국의 종교문제와 종교정책" 한중국제교류재단 2013

    2 이병길, "시진핑 시대의 중국기독교의 진로-시진핑의 종교정책으로 본 중국기독교의 중국화"

    3 한국로잔위원회, "세계 복음화를 위한 로잔운동" 2009

    4 조종남, "로잔운동의 역사와 신학" 선교횃불 2013

    5 조종남, "로잔운동의 신학과 실천" 한국로잔위원회 2017

    6 조종남, "로잔운동의 선교동향" 한국로잔위원회 2016

    7 박보경, "로잔운동에 특집 로잔복음화 운동과 한국교회 나타난 전도와 사회적 책임의 관계" 한국복음주의선교신학회 22 (22): 9-43, 2013

    8 조종남, "로잔운동과 선교신학" 한국로잔위원회 2015

    9 김승호, "로잔운동과 선교" 2014

    10 한국로잔연구교수회, "로잔운동과 선교" 한국로잔위원회 2014

    1 왕쭤안, "중국의 종교문제와 종교정책" 한중국제교류재단 2013

    2 이병길, "시진핑 시대의 중국기독교의 진로-시진핑의 종교정책으로 본 중국기독교의 중국화"

    3 한국로잔위원회, "세계 복음화를 위한 로잔운동" 2009

    4 조종남, "로잔운동의 역사와 신학" 선교횃불 2013

    5 조종남, "로잔운동의 신학과 실천" 한국로잔위원회 2017

    6 조종남, "로잔운동의 선교동향" 한국로잔위원회 2016

    7 박보경, "로잔운동에 특집 로잔복음화 운동과 한국교회 나타난 전도와 사회적 책임의 관계" 한국복음주의선교신학회 22 (22): 9-43, 2013

    8 조종남, "로잔운동과 선교신학" 한국로잔위원회 2015

    9 김승호, "로잔운동과 선교" 2014

    10 한국로잔연구교수회, "로잔운동과 선교" 한국로잔위원회 2014

    11 정흥호, "로잔운동과 상황화에 관한 논의에 대한 연구" 한국복음주의선교신학회 26 (26): 113-147, 2014

    12 김광성, "로잔운동과 동반자 협력 - 로잔운동과 중국 교회의 만남" 한국복음주의선교신학회 32 (32): 49-83, 2015

    13 안희열, "로잔 운동이 세계 선교에 끼친 공헌과 한국 교회가 나아가야 할 방향" 세계선교연구원 (27) : 109-141, 2011

    14 김광성, "「선교와 현장」 12" 장로회신학대학교출판부 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.8 0.8 0.81
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.77 0.71 0.448 0.68
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼