RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      암환자가 지각한 좋은 간호사의 특성 = Attributes Perceived by Cancer Patients as a Good Nurse

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A342713

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was based on a phenomenological approach. All patients were hospitalized cancer patient who had insight about cancer. Data were collected through in-depth interviews during the months of July and August, 2004. Interviews lasted one and half hours on an average and data were analyzed by Van Kaam method. Result: Four essential attributes of good nurse were identified: compassion, need fullfillment, virtuous and professional expertism. And four essential attributes of bad nurse were identified: insincere, neglect, disregard and lack of expertism. Conclusion: The results of this study showsd that cancer patients perceived the good nurse as possessing the qualities of compassion for patients, having virtuous attitude and professional expertism and fullfilling patient's need. And cancer patients perceived the nuse showing familial intimacy as a good nurse. This perception of cancer patients was influenced by tradition and cultural background. So there is a need for further research about our own culture and its influences on nursing practice.
      번역하기

      This study was based on a phenomenological approach. All patients were hospitalized cancer patient who had insight about cancer. Data were collected through in-depth interviews during the months of July and August, 2004. Interviews lasted one and half...

      This study was based on a phenomenological approach. All patients were hospitalized cancer patient who had insight about cancer. Data were collected through in-depth interviews during the months of July and August, 2004. Interviews lasted one and half hours on an average and data were analyzed by Van Kaam method. Result: Four essential attributes of good nurse were identified: compassion, need fullfillment, virtuous and professional expertism. And four essential attributes of bad nurse were identified: insincere, neglect, disregard and lack of expertism. Conclusion: The results of this study showsd that cancer patients perceived the good nurse as possessing the qualities of compassion for patients, having virtuous attitude and professional expertism and fullfilling patient's need. And cancer patients perceived the nuse showing familial intimacy as a good nurse. This perception of cancer patients was influenced by tradition and cultural background. So there is a need for further research about our own culture and its influences on nursing practice.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-04-15 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Clinical Nursing Research -> Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-07-31 학회명변경 한글명 : 임상간호사회 -> 병원간호사회
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Hospital Nurses Association
      KCI등재
      2005-05-27 학술지등록 한글명 : 임상간호연구
      외국어명 : Clinical Nursing Research
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.04 1.04 1.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.14 1.23 1.94 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼