RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      행정정보 공동이용 법제의 개인정보보호 정합성 연구 = A Study on the Consistency of Personal Data Protectionto Legislation of Administrative Information Co-Using

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104833392

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Public administration could by all means be defined as superintendence of governmental function under the official prestige of administrative agency and it is suggested that the legal order must have normal standards effective to the change in public administration environment due to information technology. Moreover an independent nation tend to nowadays expand the range of regulating and adjusting social life to realize the constitutional ideology of welfare state. From the viewpoint of such legislative conditions, there should be satisfied with systemic foundation, democratic procedure, and customer-centered policy in public administration. And also personal data protection as well as security management will be the core limitations crucial to E-government.
      As everyone knows, personal data protection, that is to say guarantee of information privacy, is bound to contradict the utilization of administrative information including personal data of data subject. Resultingly should the illegality be relatively reviewed the utilization of administrative information to serve the common good without infringement of information privacy. In EGA(Electronic Government Act), legislative system of administrative information co-using must be the interface between beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy.
      In other words, it is necessary to collect personal data enough almost to meet the demand of utilization administrative information for E-government for public interests. So then EGA is enacted by the provisions allowing for beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy. The probability is that the legal value of administrative information co-using will conflict with that of information privacy of data subject and intensify the ideological conflict most of all.
      Consequently speaking, it is essential for regulations on the co-used bounds of administrative information to be prescribed substantially to abide by ‘statute reservation principle’ or ‘rule of law’ in EGA. Besides will the supplementation for consent acquisition procedure and administrative control system be the matters calling for prior settlement and amendment cornerstone to stabilize the laws and regulations related to EGA by organic mediation of information-related legislations tuned to Personal Data Protection Act.
      번역하기

      Public administration could by all means be defined as superintendence of governmental function under the official prestige of administrative agency and it is suggested that the legal order must have normal standards effective to the change in public ...

      Public administration could by all means be defined as superintendence of governmental function under the official prestige of administrative agency and it is suggested that the legal order must have normal standards effective to the change in public administration environment due to information technology. Moreover an independent nation tend to nowadays expand the range of regulating and adjusting social life to realize the constitutional ideology of welfare state. From the viewpoint of such legislative conditions, there should be satisfied with systemic foundation, democratic procedure, and customer-centered policy in public administration. And also personal data protection as well as security management will be the core limitations crucial to E-government.
      As everyone knows, personal data protection, that is to say guarantee of information privacy, is bound to contradict the utilization of administrative information including personal data of data subject. Resultingly should the illegality be relatively reviewed the utilization of administrative information to serve the common good without infringement of information privacy. In EGA(Electronic Government Act), legislative system of administrative information co-using must be the interface between beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy.
      In other words, it is necessary to collect personal data enough almost to meet the demand of utilization administrative information for E-government for public interests. So then EGA is enacted by the provisions allowing for beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy. The probability is that the legal value of administrative information co-using will conflict with that of information privacy of data subject and intensify the ideological conflict most of all.
      Consequently speaking, it is essential for regulations on the co-used bounds of administrative information to be prescribed substantially to abide by ‘statute reservation principle’ or ‘rule of law’ in EGA. Besides will the supplementation for consent acquisition procedure and administrative control system be the matters calling for prior settlement and amendment cornerstone to stabilize the laws and regulations related to EGA by organic mediation of information-related legislations tuned to Personal Data Protection Act.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Public administration could by all means be defined as superintendence of governmental function under the official prestige of administrative agency and it is suggested that the legal order must have normal standards effective to the change in public administration environment due to information technology. Moreover an independent nation tend to nowadays expand the range of regulating and adjusting social life to realize the constitutional ideology of welfare state. From the viewpoint of such legislative conditions, there should be satisfied with systemic foundation, democratic procedure, and customer-centered policy in public administration. And also personal data protection as well as security management will be the core limitations crucial to E-government.
      As everyone knows, personal data protection, that is to say guarantee of information privacy, is bound to contradict the utilization of administrative information including personal data of data subject. Resultingly should the illegality be relatively reviewed the utilization of administrative information to serve the common good without infringement of information privacy. In EGA(Electronic Government Act), legislative system of administrative information co-using must be the interface between beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy.
      In other words, it is necessary to collect personal data enough almost to meet the demand of utilization administrative information for E-government for public interests. So then EGA is enacted by the provisions allowing for beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy. The probability is that the legal value of administrative information co-using will conflict with that of information privacy of data subject and intensify the ideological conflict most of all.
      Consequently speaking, it is essential for regulations on the co-used bounds of administrative information to be prescribed substantially to abide by ‘statute reservation principle’ or ‘rule of law’ in EGA. Besides will the supplementation for consent acquisition procedure and administrative control system be the matters calling for prior settlement and amendment cornerstone to stabilize the laws and regulations related to EGA by organic mediation of information-related legislations tuned to Personal Data Protection Act.
      번역하기

      Public administration could by all means be defined as superintendence of governmental function under the official prestige of administrative agency and it is suggested that the legal order must have normal standards effective to the change in public ...

      Public administration could by all means be defined as superintendence of governmental function under the official prestige of administrative agency and it is suggested that the legal order must have normal standards effective to the change in public administration environment due to information technology. Moreover an independent nation tend to nowadays expand the range of regulating and adjusting social life to realize the constitutional ideology of welfare state. From the viewpoint of such legislative conditions, there should be satisfied with systemic foundation, democratic procedure, and customer-centered policy in public administration. And also personal data protection as well as security management will be the core limitations crucial to E-government.
      As everyone knows, personal data protection, that is to say guarantee of information privacy, is bound to contradict the utilization of administrative information including personal data of data subject. Resultingly should the illegality be relatively reviewed the utilization of administrative information to serve the common good without infringement of information privacy. In EGA(Electronic Government Act), legislative system of administrative information co-using must be the interface between beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy.
      In other words, it is necessary to collect personal data enough almost to meet the demand of utilization administrative information for E-government for public interests. So then EGA is enacted by the provisions allowing for beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy. The probability is that the legal value of administrative information co-using will conflict with that of information privacy of data subject and intensify the ideological conflict most of all.
      Consequently speaking, it is essential for regulations on the co-used bounds of administrative information to be prescribed substantially to abide by ‘statute reservation principle’ or ‘rule of law’ in EGA. Besides will the supplementation for consent acquisition procedure and administrative control system be the matters calling for prior settlement and amendment cornerstone to stabilize the laws and regulations related to EGA by organic mediation of information-related legislations tuned to Personal Data Protection Act.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 서진완, "행정정보의 공동활용제도에 관한 연구" 한국행정연구원 1997

      2 이민영, "행정정보 공동이용의 추진 방향과 법적 과제" 정보통신정책연구원 2006

      3 김민호, "행정정보 공동이용의 범위와 한계에 대한 이론적 고찰 및 정책과제" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 563-592, 2009

      4 성낙인, "정보보호와 인권" 서울대학교 법학연구소 45 (45): 2004

      5 김일환, "전자정부구축에 따른 행정정보 공동이용의 방식과 유형에 관한 고찰" 법학연구소 19 (19): 1-30, 2007

      6 이민영, "인터넷 개인정보보호에 관한 법제도 연구" 정보통신정책연구원 2000

      7 김민호, "법률유보의 한계와 위임입법" 한국공법학회 28 (28): 2000

      8 이민영, "개인정보에 관한 행정통제와 권익구제의 법적 연구 - 공공기관의 CCTV 운영에 대한 행정쟁송의 적용을 중심으로 -" 법무부 (43) : 41-61, 2008

      9 이민영, "개인정보보호의 법적 쟁점과 과제" 한국정보화진흥원 2009

      10 이민영, "개인정보법제론" 진한M&B 2007

      1 서진완, "행정정보의 공동활용제도에 관한 연구" 한국행정연구원 1997

      2 이민영, "행정정보 공동이용의 추진 방향과 법적 과제" 정보통신정책연구원 2006

      3 김민호, "행정정보 공동이용의 범위와 한계에 대한 이론적 고찰 및 정책과제" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 563-592, 2009

      4 성낙인, "정보보호와 인권" 서울대학교 법학연구소 45 (45): 2004

      5 김일환, "전자정부구축에 따른 행정정보 공동이용의 방식과 유형에 관한 고찰" 법학연구소 19 (19): 1-30, 2007

      6 이민영, "인터넷 개인정보보호에 관한 법제도 연구" 정보통신정책연구원 2000

      7 김민호, "법률유보의 한계와 위임입법" 한국공법학회 28 (28): 2000

      8 이민영, "개인정보에 관한 행정통제와 권익구제의 법적 연구 - 공공기관의 CCTV 운영에 대한 행정쟁송의 적용을 중심으로 -" 법무부 (43) : 41-61, 2008

      9 이민영, "개인정보보호의 법적 쟁점과 과제" 한국정보화진흥원 2009

      10 이민영, "개인정보법제론" 진한M&B 2007

      11 김일환, "個人情報 共同利用의 統制와 監督에 관한 比較法的 考察 ― 미국과 독일의 법제를 중심으로 ―" 한국헌법학회 13 (13): 407-440, 2007

      12 Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, "Verwaltungsrecht in der Informationsgesellschaft: Einleitende Problemskizze. in: Verwaltungsrechts in der Informationsgesellschft" Nomos 2000

      13 Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, "Verwaltungskontrolle; Perspektiven. in: Verwaltungs- Kontrolle" Nomos Verlag 2001

      14 Konrad Redeker, "Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung" Kohlhammer 1994

      15 David H. Rosenbloom, "Public Administration and Law" Marcel Dekker Inc. 1997

      16 Caroline J. Tolbert, "Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States" American Society for Public Administration 68 (68): 2008

      17 Christopher John Fox, "Information and Misinformation: an investigation of information, misinformation, informing, and misinforming, Westport" Greenwood Press 1983

      18 Masahiro Okuno-Fujiwara, "Information Society and Informationization in the Electronic Age, The IT Revolution; Challenges from Innovation in Information and Communication Technology and the Role of Government" Institute for International Policy Studies 2001

      19 Lisa Schultz Bressman, "Beyond Accountability: Arbitrariness and Legitimacy in the Administrative State" 78 : 461-, 2003

      20 Rainer Pitschas, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht als Teil der öffentlichen Informationsordnung. in: Reform des allgemeinen Verwaltungsrechts" Nomos 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-11 학술지등록 한글명 : 법제연구
      외국어명 : JOURNAL OF LEGISLATION RESEARCH
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.43 0.692 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼