RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      화학물질 관리 연구-2. 환경부와 고용노동부의 관리 화학물질의 구분, 노출기준 및 독성 지표 등의 특성 비교 = Study on the Chemical Management - 2. Comparison of Classification and Health Index of Chemicals Regulated by the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of the Employment and Labor

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate the classification system of chemical substances in the Occupational Safety and Health Act(OSHA) and Chemical Substances Control Act(CSCA) and to compare several health indices (i.e., Time Weighted Average (TWA), Lethal Dose (LD50), and Lethal Concentration (LC50) of chemical substances by categories in each law. Methods: The chemicals regulated by each law were classified by the specific categories provided in the respective law; seven categories for OSHA (chemicals with OELs, chemicals prohibited from manufacturing, etc., chemicals requiring approval, chemicals kept below permissible limits, chemicals requiring workplace monitoring, chemicals requiring special management, and chemicals requiring special heath diagnosis) and five categories from the CSCA(poisonous substances, permitted substances, restricted substances, prohibited substances, and substances requiring preparation for accidents). Information on physicochemical properties, health indices including CMR characteristics, LD50 and LD50 were searched from the homepages of the Korean Occupational and Safety Agency and the National Institute of Environmental Research, etc. Statistical analysis was conducted for comparison between TWA and health index for each category. Results: The number of chemicals based on CAS numbers was different from the numbers of series of chemicals listed in each law because of repeat listings due to different names (e.g., glycol monoethylether vs. 2-ethoxy ethanol) and grouping of different chemicals under the same serial number(i.e., five different benzidine-related chemicals were categorized under one serial number(06-4-13) as prohibited substances under the CSCA). A total of 722 chemicals and 995 chemicals were listed at the OSHA and its sub-regulations and CSCA and its sub-regulations, respectively. Among these, 36.8% based on OSHA chemicals and 26.7% based on CSCA chemicals were regulated simultaneously through both laws. The correlation coefficients between TWA and LC50 and between TWA and LD50, were 0.641 and 0.506, respectively. The geometric mean values of TWA calculated by each category in both laws have no tendency according to category. The patterns of cumulative graph for TWA, LD50, LC50 were similar to the chemicals regulated by OHSA and CCSA, but their median values were lower for CCSA regulated chemicals than OSHA regulated chemicals. The GM of carcinogenic chemicals under the OSHA was significantly lower than non-CMR chemicals(2.21 mg/m3 vs 5.69 mg/m3, p=0.006), while there was no significant difference in CSCA chemicals(0.85 mg/m3 vs 1.04 mg/m3, p=0.448). LC50 showed no significant difference between carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxic chemicals and non-CMR chemicals in both laws’ regulated chemicals, while there was a difference between carcinogens and non-CMR chemicals in LD50 of the CSCA. Conclusions: This study found that there was no specific tendency or significant difference in health indices such TWA, LD50 and LC50 in subcategories of chemicals as classified by the Ministry of Labor and Employment and the Ministry of Environment. Considering the background and the purpose of each law, collaboration for harmonization in chemical categorizing and regulation is necessary.
      번역하기

      Objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate the classification system of chemical substances in the Occupational Safety and Health Act(OSHA) and Chemical Substances Control Act(CSCA) and to compare several health indices (i.e., Time Weighte...

      Objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate the classification system of chemical substances in the Occupational Safety and Health Act(OSHA) and Chemical Substances Control Act(CSCA) and to compare several health indices (i.e., Time Weighted Average (TWA), Lethal Dose (LD50), and Lethal Concentration (LC50) of chemical substances by categories in each law. Methods: The chemicals regulated by each law were classified by the specific categories provided in the respective law; seven categories for OSHA (chemicals with OELs, chemicals prohibited from manufacturing, etc., chemicals requiring approval, chemicals kept below permissible limits, chemicals requiring workplace monitoring, chemicals requiring special management, and chemicals requiring special heath diagnosis) and five categories from the CSCA(poisonous substances, permitted substances, restricted substances, prohibited substances, and substances requiring preparation for accidents). Information on physicochemical properties, health indices including CMR characteristics, LD50 and LD50 were searched from the homepages of the Korean Occupational and Safety Agency and the National Institute of Environmental Research, etc. Statistical analysis was conducted for comparison between TWA and health index for each category. Results: The number of chemicals based on CAS numbers was different from the numbers of series of chemicals listed in each law because of repeat listings due to different names (e.g., glycol monoethylether vs. 2-ethoxy ethanol) and grouping of different chemicals under the same serial number(i.e., five different benzidine-related chemicals were categorized under one serial number(06-4-13) as prohibited substances under the CSCA). A total of 722 chemicals and 995 chemicals were listed at the OSHA and its sub-regulations and CSCA and its sub-regulations, respectively. Among these, 36.8% based on OSHA chemicals and 26.7% based on CSCA chemicals were regulated simultaneously through both laws. The correlation coefficients between TWA and LC50 and between TWA and LD50, were 0.641 and 0.506, respectively. The geometric mean values of TWA calculated by each category in both laws have no tendency according to category. The patterns of cumulative graph for TWA, LD50, LC50 were similar to the chemicals regulated by OHSA and CCSA, but their median values were lower for CCSA regulated chemicals than OSHA regulated chemicals. The GM of carcinogenic chemicals under the OSHA was significantly lower than non-CMR chemicals(2.21 mg/m3 vs 5.69 mg/m3, p=0.006), while there was no significant difference in CSCA chemicals(0.85 mg/m3 vs 1.04 mg/m3, p=0.448). LC50 showed no significant difference between carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxic chemicals and non-CMR chemicals in both laws’ regulated chemicals, while there was a difference between carcinogens and non-CMR chemicals in LD50 of the CSCA. Conclusions: This study found that there was no specific tendency or significant difference in health indices such TWA, LD50 and LC50 in subcategories of chemicals as classified by the Ministry of Labor and Employment and the Ministry of Environment. Considering the background and the purpose of each law, collaboration for harmonization in chemical categorizing and regulation is necessary.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신주연, "휴대전화 케이스 가공업체에서 발생한 다발성 말초신경병 증례" 대한직업환경의학회 17 (17): 138-143, 2005

      2 윤충식, "환경부의 화학물질관리법, 화학물질등록 및 평가에 관한 법률, 고용노동부의 산업안전보건법의 화학물질 관련 내용 비교" 한국환경보건학회 40 (40): 331-345, 2014

      3 최상준, "우리나라 산업안전보건법상 특별관리물질 규정에 대한 독일, 영국 및 일본과의 비교법적 고찰" 한국산업보건학회 23 (23): 137-147, 2013

      4 조흠학, "산업안전보건법의 제정에 관한 역사적 의미에 관한 연구" 법학연구원 (37) : 23-82, 2011

      5 이권섭, "산업안전보건법에 의한 관리대상 유해물질 선정의 타당성 연구" 한국산업보건학회 19 (19): 139-155, 2009

      6 Im CH, "Understanding carcinogenic substances" 301 : 15-20, 2013

      7 이봉우, "UN GHS와 위험물안전관리법상의 위험물질 분류기준 비교 및선진화 방안 연구" 한국가스학회 17 (17): 42-50, 2013

      8 Megumi S, "The contribution of acute toxicity in animals to occupational exposure limits of chemical substances" 37 : 22-27, 1999

      9 "National Institute of Environmental Research(NIER)"

      10 Korea Occupatioanl Safety and Health Agency, "MSDS"

      1 신주연, "휴대전화 케이스 가공업체에서 발생한 다발성 말초신경병 증례" 대한직업환경의학회 17 (17): 138-143, 2005

      2 윤충식, "환경부의 화학물질관리법, 화학물질등록 및 평가에 관한 법률, 고용노동부의 산업안전보건법의 화학물질 관련 내용 비교" 한국환경보건학회 40 (40): 331-345, 2014

      3 최상준, "우리나라 산업안전보건법상 특별관리물질 규정에 대한 독일, 영국 및 일본과의 비교법적 고찰" 한국산업보건학회 23 (23): 137-147, 2013

      4 조흠학, "산업안전보건법의 제정에 관한 역사적 의미에 관한 연구" 법학연구원 (37) : 23-82, 2011

      5 이권섭, "산업안전보건법에 의한 관리대상 유해물질 선정의 타당성 연구" 한국산업보건학회 19 (19): 139-155, 2009

      6 Im CH, "Understanding carcinogenic substances" 301 : 15-20, 2013

      7 이봉우, "UN GHS와 위험물안전관리법상의 위험물질 분류기준 비교 및선진화 방안 연구" 한국가스학회 17 (17): 42-50, 2013

      8 Megumi S, "The contribution of acute toxicity in animals to occupational exposure limits of chemical substances" 37 : 22-27, 1999

      9 "National Institute of Environmental Research(NIER)"

      10 Korea Occupatioanl Safety and Health Agency, "MSDS"

      11 Ministry of Employment Labor, "Exposure limits for chemical substances and physical Agents"

      12 Byun HJ, "Effective risk management system for chemicals in industries" 20 (20): 32-36, 2013

      13 Korea Information System for Chemical Safety Management, "Chemicals information"

      14 Park JS, "An outbreak of hematopoietic and reproductive disorders due to solvents containing 2-Bromopropane in an electronic factory, South Korea: epidemiological survey" 39 : 138-143, 1997

      15 Ministry of Environment, "A study on criteria improvements of toxic chemicals management and handling facility. 2007 Research Report" Ministry of Government Legislation

      16 Fred A., "A history of the international chemical industry" Chemical Heritage Foundation 1-16, 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-03-06 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국산업위생학회지 -> 한국산업보건학회지 KCI등재
      2014-12-19 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국산업위생학회 -> 한국산업보건학회 KCI등재
      2014-08-14 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Society Of Occupational And Environmental Hygiene -> Korean Industrial Hygiene Association KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.24 0.389 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼