RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 치위생과 학생의 치열궁 크기 및 형태와 교합 = The Size, Form of Dental Arch and Occlusion in Dental Hygiene Students in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100120332

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine the size, form of dental arch and occlusion type in college students in our country and the relationship of the factors. The subjects in this study were 210 selected dental hygiene students. The collected data were analyzed by a statistical package PASW 18.0. When their size, form and occlusion of dental arch were analyzed, the inter-canine width of the maxillary was 34.38 mm, and theinter-first molar width was 52.05 mm. The canine depth was 8.60 mm, and the first molar depth was 28.69 mm. As for the mandibular, theinter-canine width was 26.42 mm, and the inter-first molar width was 44.83 mm. The canine depth was 5.54 mm, and the first molar depth was24.38 mm. Concerning the form of dental arch, the percentage of normal dental arch in the maxillary stood at 29.0, and that of crowding stood at 60.5. The percentage of spacing stood at 10.5. In the case of the mandibular, the percentage of normal dental arch stood at 29.0; crowding, 55.7; and spacing, 15.2. In relation to occlusion, the percentage of normal occlusion stood at 16.7. As to malocclusion, class I that accounted for55.7 was most common, and class II and class III respectively accounted for 20.5 and 7.1. When the size of dental arch was compared according to the form and occlusion of it, dental arch was largest (45.95 mm) in size when the form of dental arch in the inter-first molar width of the mandibularwas spacing. The size of dental arch was 44.73 mm when its form in the same region was normal, and that was 44.58 mm when its form in the same region was crowding (p=0.032). Regarding the relationship between the form and occlusion of dental arch, crowding was most common when there were class I, II and III of malocclusion both in the maxillary and mandibular.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine the size, form of dental arch and occlusion type in college students in our country and the relationship of the factors. The subjects in this study were 210 selected dental hygiene students. The collected data ...

    The purpose of this study was to examine the size, form of dental arch and occlusion type in college students in our country and the relationship of the factors. The subjects in this study were 210 selected dental hygiene students. The collected data were analyzed by a statistical package PASW 18.0. When their size, form and occlusion of dental arch were analyzed, the inter-canine width of the maxillary was 34.38 mm, and theinter-first molar width was 52.05 mm. The canine depth was 8.60 mm, and the first molar depth was 28.69 mm. As for the mandibular, theinter-canine width was 26.42 mm, and the inter-first molar width was 44.83 mm. The canine depth was 5.54 mm, and the first molar depth was24.38 mm. Concerning the form of dental arch, the percentage of normal dental arch in the maxillary stood at 29.0, and that of crowding stood at 60.5. The percentage of spacing stood at 10.5. In the case of the mandibular, the percentage of normal dental arch stood at 29.0; crowding, 55.7; and spacing, 15.2. In relation to occlusion, the percentage of normal occlusion stood at 16.7. As to malocclusion, class I that accounted for55.7 was most common, and class II and class III respectively accounted for 20.5 and 7.1. When the size of dental arch was compared according to the form and occlusion of it, dental arch was largest (45.95 mm) in size when the form of dental arch in the inter-first molar width of the mandibularwas spacing. The size of dental arch was 44.73 mm when its form in the same region was normal, and that was 44.58 mm when its form in the same region was crowding (p=0.032). Regarding the relationship between the form and occlusion of dental arch, crowding was most common when there were class I, II and III of malocclusion both in the maxillary and mandibular.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이채형, "한국인과 일본인 부정교합자의 하악 치열궁 형태 비교" 대한치과교정학회 37 (37): 376-385, 2007

    2 임동혁, "한국인 아동의 유치열기의 특성 - 치아 치열궁의 관계" 대한치과교정학회 36 (36): 84-90, 2006

    3 이성준, "한국인 부정교합자의 하악 치열궁의 크기와 형태" 대한치과교정학회 35 (35): 15-22, 2005

    4 한지형, "일부대학 치위생과 학생의 체격과 치열궁 크기의 관련성" 한국치위생과학회 13 (13): 197-202, 2013

    5 임동혁, "서울대학교 치과병원 교정과에 내원한 부정교합 환자의 최근 경향" 대한치과교정학회 33 (33): 63-72, 2003

    6 정민호, "교정전문치과에 내원한 부정교합환자의 최근 경향" 대한치과교정학회 39 (39): 36-42, 2009

    7 Angle EH, "Treatment of the teeth" S.S. White 1907

    8 Scott JH, "The shape of the dental arch" 36 : 996-1003, 1964

    9 Baik HS, "The distributions and trends in malocclusion patients" 25 : 87-100, 1995

    10 Kwon YC, "The dental arch form in normal occlusion" 19 : 95-106, 1989

    1 이채형, "한국인과 일본인 부정교합자의 하악 치열궁 형태 비교" 대한치과교정학회 37 (37): 376-385, 2007

    2 임동혁, "한국인 아동의 유치열기의 특성 - 치아 치열궁의 관계" 대한치과교정학회 36 (36): 84-90, 2006

    3 이성준, "한국인 부정교합자의 하악 치열궁의 크기와 형태" 대한치과교정학회 35 (35): 15-22, 2005

    4 한지형, "일부대학 치위생과 학생의 체격과 치열궁 크기의 관련성" 한국치위생과학회 13 (13): 197-202, 2013

    5 임동혁, "서울대학교 치과병원 교정과에 내원한 부정교합 환자의 최근 경향" 대한치과교정학회 33 (33): 63-72, 2003

    6 정민호, "교정전문치과에 내원한 부정교합환자의 최근 경향" 대한치과교정학회 39 (39): 36-42, 2009

    7 Angle EH, "Treatment of the teeth" S.S. White 1907

    8 Scott JH, "The shape of the dental arch" 36 : 996-1003, 1964

    9 Baik HS, "The distributions and trends in malocclusion patients" 25 : 87-100, 1995

    10 Kwon YC, "The dental arch form in normal occlusion" 19 : 95-106, 1989

    11 Sved A, "The application of engineering methods to orthodontics" 38 : 399-421, 1952

    12 Shaw WC, "Quality control in orthodontics: factors influencing the receipt of orthodontic treatment" 170 : 66-68, 1991

    13 Pepe SH, "Polynomial and catenary curve fits to human dental arches" 54 : 1124-1132,

    14 Sohn BW, "Modality of malocclusion according to regional difference using HLD, TPI, and HMAR" 23 : 23-40, 1993

    15 Lee WY, "Knowledge of orthodontics and malocclusion" 22 : 815-822, 1992

    16 Chuck GC, "Ideal arch form" 4 : 312-327, 1934

    17 Moyer RE, "Handbook of orthodontic for student and general practitioner" Year Book Medical Publisher 1-778, 1973

    18 Björk A, "Growth in width of the maxilla studied by the implant method" 8 : 26-33, 1974

    19 Sampson PD, "Dental arch shape: a statistical analysis using conic sections" 79 : 535-548, 1981

    20 Goldstain MS, "Change in dimension and form of the dental arches with age" 21 : 357-380, 1935

    21 Moorrees CF, "Change in dental arch dimension expressed on the basis of tooth eruption as a measure of biologic age" 44 : 129-141, 1965

    22 Jung MH, "Causative factors and predictability of arch length discrepancy" 27 : 457-471, 1997

    23 Begg PR, "Begg orthodontic theory and technique" W.B. Sounders 7-86, 1977

    24 Boone GN, "Archwires designed for individual patients" 33 : 178-185, 1963

    25 Lu KH, "An orthogonal analysis of the form, symmetry and asymmetry of the dental arch" 11 : 057-1069, 1966

    26 Nam JH, "A study of mandibular dental arch form of the Korean with normal occlusion" 26 : 535-564, 1996

    27 Cho JH, "A study of dental arch form in normal occlusion" 14 : 249-261, 1984

    28 Ahn BG, "A statistical study on the effect of tooth size and dental arch size upon the crowding" 20 : 307-315, 1990

    29 Kim YS, "A longitudinal study on the development change of dental arch width and length" 30 : 19-31, 2000

    30 Tulloch JF, "A comparision of attitudes towards orthodontic treatment in British and American communities" 85 : 253-259, 1984

    31 Jang JH, "A comparative study on dental arch dimension of high school females according to the region of residence and facial type" 24 : 885-889, 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.04 1.04 1.04
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1 0.92 1.307 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼