RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘비시’(Vichy)와 역사교과서 = ‘Vichy’ and History textbook of France

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82434546

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is to examine the reception of the history textbook about the alteration of the historiography of the Vichy Regime. After the Liberation, the history textbook did not refer in detail to the Vichy Regime. Simply, it considered the Vichy Regi...

      This study is to examine the reception of the history textbook about the alteration of the historiography of the Vichy Regime. After the Liberation, the history textbook did not refer in detail to the Vichy Regime. Simply, it considered the Vichy Regime as the puppet regime under the Occupation of Germany. However, the studies of the Vichy Regime, since the 1970's, showed that it was legitimate and voluntary to collaborate with Germany. The Vichy Regime was given official approval from the Parliament. The Parliament gave full power to Philippe Pétain, President of the Vichy Regime. Thus, the Vichy Regime isn't the history of the German Occupation, but that of France. It isn't an isolated section, but central to the contemporary history of France. At this point, this study shows how Middle School of “History and Geography textbooks” reflect the recent study of the Vichy Regime, according to the period between the 1970's and the 1990's. However, the standard of the analysis about the contents of these textbooks is not about the change of the historiography of the education, not on those of the Vichy Regime, but on those of the French-German recommendations. After the French-German Council in 1988, the content of the Vichy Regime and of the National Socialist Party first appeared in the French-German recommendation. It is remarkable that France and Germany both spoke of the “Black Past”covered in the history textbook revision. The change of the historiography of the Vichy Regime and the National Socialist Party came from the recommendation of the French-German Council. So, it is possible to examine how the clauses of the recommendations of 1988 that the French Council requested for the history textbooks of Germany, is reflected in the “History and Geography textbooks” of the French Middle School. The analysis of the history textbook of France has two directions : the reception of its titles about the Second World War, and those of its content about the Vichy Regime. The title “The Vichy Regime”didn't exist as a big heading in the 1970' textbooks, but exist clearly in the 1990' textbooks. The appearance of the titles, “the Vichy of France”, “France in War”, means that not only De Gaulle's Regime, but the Vichy Regime is included in the contemporary history of France. It is possible to say that this title related to the change of the historiography of the Vichy regime. The content in the 1970's and the 1990's history textbooks partly reflect the clauses of the recommendation of 1988. The common content between in the 1970's and 1990's textbooks mention that the Vichy Regime is legitimate(the first clause of the recommendation of 1988). The content of 1970's textbooks mention that the Vichy Regime of Philippe Pétain was good for protecting France against Germany and that Pierre Laval tried collaboration with Germany(the second and third clauses). On the contrary, these points were not reflected in the content of the 1990's textbooks. The latter mentions that the Vichy Regime of Philippe Pétain collaborated actively with Germany, like Pierre Laval, and that many of the French hardly took part in the Resistance of 1943, not in the beginning of the Vichy Regime. These points shows that the recommendation of 1988 did not get the changes in the recent historiography of the Vichy Regime of the 1990's. Thus it might be possible to, henceforth, revise the recommendations by the French-Germany Council, according to the recent historiography of the Vichy Regime. Finally, the history textbook reflect the historiography of the Vichy Regime since 1970's and the latter bring the revision of the recommendations between the history textbooks of France and Germany. This relation show the importance of the change of the historial conscience that makes a self-reflection of the history of the“Black Past” covered, for examples the Vichy Regime. This conscience would be basic for the process of the Fre

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1.‘조건적 현재사’에서 바라본 비시연구 2. 프랑스 중학교 역사교과서에 서술된 비시정권 1) 프랑스-독일 역사 교과서 권고안(1988) 2) 제2차 세계대전에 관한 교과서 목차의 변화 3) 교과서 내용에 반영된 비시정권 관련 권고사항 3.‘오늘날의 비시’
      • 1.‘조건적 현재사’에서 바라본 비시연구 2. 프랑스 중학교 역사교과서에 서술된 비시정권 1) 프랑스-독일 역사 교과서 권고안(1988) 2) 제2차 세계대전에 관한 교과서 목차의 변화 3) 교과서 내용에 반영된 비시정권 관련 권고사항 3.‘오늘날의 비시’
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼