RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    부동산 개발신탁 수익권의 유동화 가능성 = The Feasibility on the Securitization of Beneficiary Right in Real Estate Development Trust Focused on the Survey of Understanding of Development Companies

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76490748

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of the securitization of beneficiary right. For this, the attitude survey has been conducted for those who were in charge of real estate evelopment projects in related companies. From the survey, it has been analyzed because beneficiary rights are not effective unless development companies register through trust system. In other words, development companies are in the significant position for trust and securitization. The survey has been conducted through questionnaire.
    As a result of the study, it has been clear that a beneficiary right was characteristics of bonds in legal perspective, and that it could be transferred and therefore securitized. Besides, it has been proposed to revise the current related laws.
    In addition, the reasons that it is difficult to securitize beneficiary right are the followings: First, no market exists for circulation. Second, the lack of recognition for the securitization of beneficiary certificate spreads. Finally, many people allege that the securitization of beneficiary certificates cannot be basic assets for securitization.
    Regarding the feasibility of securitization of beneficiary right and essential matters for the purpose of this study, the following are concluded : First, it would be necessary to form the market, in which q beneficiary right could be distributed. Second, it would be needed to establish legal grounds for securities. Third, most of all, it would be required to set up a credit reinforcement system for the protection of investors.
    Based on the results of this study, the securitization of beneficiary right could enhance the potentials to raise more capital for development companies and to increase stable funding to the whole real estate market. It would be required to improve the system for the securitization of beneficiary right and would be inevitable for the securitization of beneficiary right to arrange concrete and practical plans.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of the securitization of beneficiary right. For this, the attitude survey has been conducted for those who were in charge of real estate evelopment projects in related companies. From the survey,...

    The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of the securitization of beneficiary right. For this, the attitude survey has been conducted for those who were in charge of real estate evelopment projects in related companies. From the survey, it has been analyzed because beneficiary rights are not effective unless development companies register through trust system. In other words, development companies are in the significant position for trust and securitization. The survey has been conducted through questionnaire.
    As a result of the study, it has been clear that a beneficiary right was characteristics of bonds in legal perspective, and that it could be transferred and therefore securitized. Besides, it has been proposed to revise the current related laws.
    In addition, the reasons that it is difficult to securitize beneficiary right are the followings: First, no market exists for circulation. Second, the lack of recognition for the securitization of beneficiary certificate spreads. Finally, many people allege that the securitization of beneficiary certificates cannot be basic assets for securitization.
    Regarding the feasibility of securitization of beneficiary right and essential matters for the purpose of this study, the following are concluded : First, it would be necessary to form the market, in which q beneficiary right could be distributed. Second, it would be needed to establish legal grounds for securities. Third, most of all, it would be required to set up a credit reinforcement system for the protection of investors.
    Based on the results of this study, the securitization of beneficiary right could enhance the potentials to raise more capital for development companies and to increase stable funding to the whole real estate market. It would be required to improve the system for the securitization of beneficiary right and would be inevitable for the securitization of beneficiary right to arrange concrete and practical plans.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 三菱信託銀行, "不動産金融商品" 東洋經濟新聞社 2001

    2 不動産證券化協會, "不動産信託受益權販賣業ハンドブック" 不動産證券化協會 2006

    3 三國仁司, "不動産の證券化と方法" 東洋經濟新聞社 1997

    4 임근영, "특허권 기부제도 및 증권화 연구" 한국발명진흥회 2005

    5 임완상, "지적재산권의 유동화에 관한 연구" 동국대학교 2008

    6 박국규, "주택사업의 시행과 사업성검토" 어드북스 2007

    7 김형태, "자산유동화증권(ABS)시장 발전방안 연구" 한국증권연구원 2002

    8 윤부찬, "자산유동화제도에 관한 고찰" 한국부동산법학회 6 : 2000

    9 박환일, "자산유동화(ABS)란 무엇인가, 증권사랑방 발표자료, 한국증권학회(2005.6) 박환일(2001), 자산유동화의 이용확대에 따른 법적 문제, 상사법연구 제20권 제1호, 한국상사법학회"

    10 박웅, "자산유동화 이론과 실제" 매일경제신문사 2003

    1 三菱信託銀行, "不動産金融商品" 東洋經濟新聞社 2001

    2 不動産證券化協會, "不動産信託受益權販賣業ハンドブック" 不動産證券化協會 2006

    3 三國仁司, "不動産の證券化と方法" 東洋經濟新聞社 1997

    4 임근영, "특허권 기부제도 및 증권화 연구" 한국발명진흥회 2005

    5 임완상, "지적재산권의 유동화에 관한 연구" 동국대학교 2008

    6 박국규, "주택사업의 시행과 사업성검토" 어드북스 2007

    7 김형태, "자산유동화증권(ABS)시장 발전방안 연구" 한국증권연구원 2002

    8 윤부찬, "자산유동화제도에 관한 고찰" 한국부동산법학회 6 : 2000

    9 박환일, "자산유동화(ABS)란 무엇인가, 증권사랑방 발표자료, 한국증권학회(2005.6) 박환일(2001), 자산유동화의 이용확대에 따른 법적 문제, 상사법연구 제20권 제1호, 한국상사법학회"

    10 박웅, "자산유동화 이론과 실제" 매일경제신문사 2003

    11 방근석, "자산유동화" 한국경제연구원 2003

    12 한국건설산업연구원, "자산디플레이션과 부동산 증권화 -그 이론과 사례-" 한국건설산업연구원 1998

    13 방경식, "부동산학개론(제3판)" 부연사 2007

    14 김홍중, "부동산신탁수익권의 유동화에 관한 연구" 건국대학교 2008

    15 김범수, "부동산금융 -이론과 실제-" 청목출판사 2007

    16 김종서, "부동산개발신탁수익권의 유동화 방안" 한국부동산학회 34 : 2008

    17 김종서, "부동산개발신탁사업에 있어 신탁수익권증서의 활용을 통한 자금조달방안에 관한 연구" 한국주거환경학회 5 (5): 2007

    18 이종규, "부동산개발사업의 이해(개정판)" 부연사 2004

    19 노태욱, "부동산개발론(개정판)" 부연사 2004

    20 장희순, "부동산 유동화에 의한 불량채권처리와 개발자금조달" 부연사 2003

    21 왕세종, "부동산 금융 환경의 변화와 새로운 건설금융 방안" 한국건설산업연구원 2001

    22 홍선관, "부동산 개발의 원칙" 이다미디어 2006

    23 자산유동화실무연구회, "금융혁명 ABS" 한국경제신문사 2004

    24 금융감독원, "금융감독개론(2007 개정판)" 금융감독원 2007

    25 노순규, "건설업의 타당성과 사업계획서" 한국기업경영연구원 2007

    26 이의섭, "건설사업의 공급자 금융현황과 발전방안" 한국건설산업연구원 2004

    27 開發型不動産證券化硏究會, "開發型不動産證券化の知識と實際" 不動産證券化協會 2005

    28 木村恒?, "信託受益權販賣業入門" 住宅新聞社 2006

    29 Morrison, Kenneth P., "The Securitization Phenomenon, Securitization - An International Guide; A special supplement to International Financial Law Review" Euromoney Publication 1993

    30 Steven L. Schwarcz, "Structured Finance : A Guide to the Principles of Asset Securitization" 2002

    31 William B. Brueggeman, "Rear Estate Finance and Investments" 2008

    32 Alfred A. Ring, "Real Estate Principle and Practices" Prentice-Hall 1981

    33 Larry E. Wofford, "Real Estate" John Wiley & Sons 1983

    34 David Cadman, "Property Development" E & F. N. Spon 1983

    35 Henderson John, "Asset Securitization: Current Techniques and Emerging Market Applications" Euromoney Publication 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.8 0.8 0.83
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 0.86 0.868 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼