미국 연방헌법상의 적법절차조항과 경제적 자유권과의 관계 및 함의

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Under the Constitution of the United States, the 14th. Amendment provides the due process of law, which has been called as Magical Pandora Box, so to speak, 'a general clause', for the due process clause has no limitation on its scope of application and function. In this regard, the analysis of the due process clause of the Constitution of the United States should be focused on the discussions of the cases handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States. It would be epochical, in a practical meaning, that to add the meaning of the substantive and natural justice on the top of the historical meaning of the procedural due process, which gives a lot of practical meaning to the due process. Especially this is true when considering the right to make a decision or right to autonomy in private sector which has been developed since 1960. However, this article focuses on the discussions before 1960's. Hence, the scope of the discussion will be limited on the analysis of relationship between the development of the due process clause and the economical liberties cases handed down by the Supreme Court of the United State. In addition, this article argues that the broad interpretation of the due process including the substantive aspect, so to speak, incorporation, has its own purpose to make up the constitutional defect not having direct constitutional provisions for the right of privacy, etc. To the contrary, it would be of no use to extensive interpretation of the due process including the substantive aspect, for, under the Korean Constitution, article 10, or article 37 Clause 2, provides a perfect ground on which the general restriction of the fundamental rights would stand without extending the meaning of the due process.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정종섭, "헌법학원론 제8판" 박영사 2013

2 김철수, "헌법학개론 제19전정신판" 박영사 2007

3 양건, "헌법학 제3판" 법문사 2012

4 한수웅, "헌법학 제2판" 법문사 2012

5 홍성방, "헌법학" 박영사 2012

6 이상경, "헌법적 쟁점에 대한 판단자제의 원리 ― 미국 연방대법원의 위헌성ㆍ위법성 통제의 구별 ―" 한국공법학회 38 (38): 1-26, 2010

7 허영, "한국헌법론 제8판" 박영사 2012

8 전광석, "한국사회보장법론 제9판" 집현재 2012

9 성낙인, "판례헌법 제2판" 법문사 2012

10 정재황, "신 헌법입문" 박영사 2012

11 안경환, "민주주의의 실질화를 위한 적법절차" (3) : 1992

12 박종보, "미국헌법이 한국헌법에 미친 영향" 법학연구소 24 (24): 57-76, 2007

13 임지봉, "미국헌법상의 적법절차 조항과 그 운용" 13 : 2002

14 성기용, "미국헌법상 실체적 적법절차의 법리" 미국헌법학회 18 (18): 149-186, 2007

15 문홍주, "미국헌법과 기본적 인권" 유풍출판사 2002

16 윤명선, "미국 기본권 연구" 경희대학교 출판국 2005

17 안경환, "마법의 상자 적법절차조항" 1987

18 Robert G. McCloskey, "The Doubtful Distinction Between Economic and Civil Rights, Economic Due Process and the Supreme Court: An Exhumation and Reburial" 34 : 1962

19 John H. Garvey, "Modern Constitutional Theory: A Reader, 5th ed" Thomson West 2003

20 Ronald Dworkin, "Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution" Harvard University Press 1996

21 Richard Posner, "Economic Due Process, Economic Analysis of Law, 3rd ed" Aspen 1986

22 Nowak, "Constitutional Law" West Group 2004