장기기증 메시지의 효과 구현에 호혜적/공감적 소구와 사회적 유대감이 미치는 영향

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 이론적 배경
• 3. 연구 방법
• 4. 연구 결과
• 5. 결론 및 토론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 선혜진, "효율적인 장기기증 교육‧홍보 메시지 개발을 위한 연구: 개인적 특성 및 가치요인을 중심으로" 한국콘텐츠학회 17 (17): 170-180, 2017

2 이승조, "호혜적/공감적 소구 유형과 장애인 태도의 상호작용에 따른 돕기 메시지 수용 효과의 차이" 한국소통학회 15 (15): 139-169, 2016

3 현윤정, "해외 주요 국가와 비교 고찰을 통한 인체조직기증 활성화 방안" 한국산학기술학회 21 (21): 836-844, 2020

4 최종렬, "한국 장기기증법의 도덕 경제" 한국인문사회과학회 44 (44): 147-168, 2020

5 권회연, "통합교육 경험이 대학생들의 장애인 인권 의식 및 인성에 미친 영향 연구" 한국통합교육학회 10 (10): 1-27, 2015

6 이은정, "장애인 돕기 캠페인에서 사회적 가치가 소구 유형의 효과에 미치는 영향: 평등주의, 인도주의, 상호주의를 중심으로" 중앙대학교 대학원 2019

7 차동필, "장기기증 활성화를 위한 설득기법의 적용" 한국언론학회 55 (55): 32-46, 2011

8 김현정, "장기기증 장려 메시지에 대한 심리적 저항 : 개인의 저항 성향과 정보원 요인을 중심으로" 한국지역언론학회 17 (17): 5-27, 2017

9 유성신, "장기기증 서약의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구: 수정된 계획행동이론의 적용" 한국광고홍보학회 17 (17): 43-70, 2015

10 이호준, "자기자비가 타인자비에 미치는 영향: 긍정정서와 사회적 유대감의 매개 효과" 한국재활심리학회 25 (25): 415-428, 2018

11 이수인, "일반신뢰와 정부신뢰가 뇌사 후 장기 기증에 미치는 영향" 한국보건정보통계학회 43 (43): 167-174, 2018

12 이병관, "새로운 미디어 공공 캠페인으로서 교육적-오락물의 설득 효과에 대한 탐구: 텔레비전 프로그램의 장기기증에 대한 개인의 태도와 행동에 미치는 영향" 한국광고학회 19 (19): 75-97, 2008

13 조화진, "사회적 유대감과 주관적 안녕의 관계: 불안통제와 희망의 매개효과" 한국상담학회 21 (21): 235-254, 2020

14 이승조, "돕기 메시지의 전달에서 이성적 소구의 활용을 위한 제언 호혜적/공감적 소구의 대비를 중심으로" 한국언론학회 13 (13): 5-43, 2017

15 이수진, "대학생이 지각하는 사회유대감과 자율성이 학교생활적응과 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향: 대인관계문제를 매개로" 한국심리학회산하학교심리학회 6 (6): 229-248, 2009

16 손민서, "대학생의 뇌사자 장기기증 의도에 영향을 미치는 요인" 보건의료산업학회 12 (12): 191-202, 2018

17 김소윤, "내러티브 메시지의 설득 효과 및 그 처리과정에 관한 연구-장기기증 메시지에 대한 수용자 반응을 중심으로" 한국소통학회 (7) : 76-108, 2007

18 박정윤, "균형적 시간관이 대학생의 궁극적 행복감에 미치는 영향:사회적 유대감의 매개효과" 한국생애학회 9 (9): 85-106, 2019

19 조원현, "국내 장기기증 현황과 기증감소의 해결방안" 대한이식학회 32 (32): 38-48, 2018

20 이승조, "개인 성향으로서의 자존감과긍ㆍ부정 프레이밍의 상호작용이국제 기아 돕기 캠페인의 효과에 미치는 영향" 한국언론학회 57 (57): 56-77, 2013

21 이수빈, "감사가 이타행동에 미치는 영향: 사회적 유대감과 사회적 책임감을 중심으로" 한국심리학회산하학교심리학회 15 (15): 379-398, 2018

22 Hansen, S. L, "“Are you in or are you out?!” Moral appeals to the public in organ donation poster campaigns: A multimodal and ethical analysis" 33 (33): 1020-1034, 2018

23 Ferguson, A. M, "When does empathy feel good?" 39 : 125-129, 2021

24 Lee, R. M, "The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity" 45 (45): 338-345, 1998

25 Reinhart, A. M, "The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation : The mediating role of psychological reactance" 74 (74): 229-255, 2007

26 Young, C, "The impact of rational, emotional, and physiological advertising images on purchase intention : How TV ads influence brand memory" 59 (59): 329-341, 2019

27 Ruiz, S, "The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appeals" 57 (57): 657-664, 2004

28 Hamilton, W. D, "The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II" 7 (7): 17-52, 1964

29 Trivers, R. L, "The evolution of reciprocal altruism" 46 (46): 35-57, 1971

30 Berman, J. Z, "The Braggart's dilemma : On the social rewards and penalties of advertising prosocial behavior" 52 (52): 90-104, 2015

31 Small, D. A, "Sympathy and callousness : The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims" 102 (102): 143-153, 2007

32 Rand, D. G, "Spontaneous giving and calculated greed" 489 (489): 427-430, 2012

33 Baek, T. H, "Social exclusion influences on the effectiveness of altruistic versus egoistic appeals in charitable advertising" 30 (30): 75-90, 2019

34 Lee, R. M, "Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress : Testing a mediator model" 48 (48): 310-318, 2001

35 Feeley, T. H, "Reactions to narrative and statistical written messages promoting organ donation" 19 (19): 89-100, 2006

36 Quick, B. L, "Prospect theory, discrete emotions, and freedom threats : An extension of psychological reactance theory" 65 (65): 40-61, 2015

37 Eisenberg, N, "Prosocial motivation : Inferences from an opaque body of work" 87 (87): 1668-1678, 2016

38 Chandler, J. A, "Priority in organ allocation to previously registered donors : Public perceptions of the fairness and effectiveness of priority systems" 22 (22): 413-422, 2012

39 Park, J. H, "Persistent misunderstandings of inclusive fitness and kin selection : Their ubiquitous appearance in social psychology textbooks" 5 (5): 860-873, 2007

40 Forgas, J. P, "On being happy and gullible : Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception" 44 (44): 1362-1367, 2008

41 Dunkel, A, "Micro-cultural customization of organ donation propagation messages" 101 (101): 824-829, 2018

42 Davis, M. H, "Measuring individual differences in empathy : Evidence for a multidimensional approach" 44 (44): 113-126, 1983

43 Rady, M. Y, "Mass media campaignsand organ donation: Managing conflicting messages and interests" 15 (15): 229-241, 2012

44 Newton, J. D, "How does the general public view posthumous organ donation? A meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature" 11 : 791-, 2011

45 Marshall, J. A, "Group selection and kin selection : formally equivalent approaches" 26 (26): 325-332, 2011

46 Maynard Smith, J, "Group selection and kin selection" 200 : 1145-1147, 1964

47 Cohen, E. L, "Gifts of giving : The role of empathy and perceived benefits to others and self in young adults’ decisions to become organ donors" 18 (18): 128-138, 2013

48 Zarantonello, L, "Functional and experiential routes to persuasion : An analysis of advertising in emerging versus developed markets" 30 (30): 46-56, 2013

49 VanderKnyff, J, "Framing life and death on YouTube : The strategic communication of organ donation messages by organ procurement organizations" 20 (20): 211-219, 2015

50 Brennan, L, "Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing" 63 (63): 140-146, 2010

51 Morgan, S. E, "Facts versus 'feelings': How rational is the decision to become an organ donor?" 13 (13): 644-658, 2008

52 Feeley, T. H, "Examining college students' intentions to become organ donors" 10 (10): 237-249, 2005

53 Van Bavel, J. J, "Evaluation is a dynamic process : moving beyond dual system models" 6 (6): 438-454, 2012

54 Prottas, J. M, "Encouraging altruism : Public attitudes and the marketing of organ donation" 61 (61): 278-306, 1983

55 Batson, C. D, "Empathy–from bench to bedside" MIT press 1-54, 2012

56 Moorlock, G, "Empathy, social media, and directed altruistic living organ donation" 32 (32): 289-297, 2018

57 Erlandsson, A, "Emotional reactions, perceived impact and perceived responsibility mediate the identifiable victim effect, proportion dominance effect and in-group effect respectively" 127 : 1-14, 2015

58 Grigaliunaite, V, "Emotional or rational? The determination of the influence of advertising appeal on advertising effectiveness" 63 (63): 391-414, 2016

59 Phelps, E. A, "Emotion and decision making : Multiple modulatory neural circuits" 37 : 263-287, 2014

60 Chang, C. T, "Effects of message framing, vividness congruency and statistical framing on responses to charity advertising" 29 (29): 195-220, 2010

61 Chien, Y. H, "Effects of message framing and exemplars on promoting organ donation" 117 (117): 692-702, 2015

62 Mossialos, E, "Does organ donation legislation affect individuals' willingness to donate their own or their relative's organs? Evidence from European Union survey data" 8 (8): 48-58, 2008

63 Sukalla, F, "Dispelling fears and myths of organ donation : How narratives that include information reduce ambivalence and reactance" 11 : 5027-5047, 2017

64 Studts, J. L, "Decisions to register for the national marrow donor program : Rational vs emotional appeals" 45 (45): 422-428, 2010

65 Hansen, S. L, "Critical analysis of communication strategies in public health promotion : An empirical‐ethical study on organ donation in Germany" 35 (35): 161-172, 2021

66 Weber, K, "Creating persuasive messages advocating organ donation" 54 (54): 67-87, 2006

67 Lindauer, M, "Comparing the effect of rational and emotional appeals on donation behavior" 15 (15): 413-420, 2020

68 Lin-Healy, F, "Cheapened altruism : Discounting personally affected prosocial actors" 117 (117): 269-274, 2012

69 Decker, O, "Between commodification and altruism: Gender imbalance and attitudes towards organ donation. A representative survey of the German community" 17 (17): 251-255, 2008

70 Burkell, J. A, "Attitudes toward reciprocity systems for organ donation and allocation for transplantation" 38 (38): 957-986, 2013

71 Erlandsson, A, "Argumentinconsistency in charity appeals : Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context" 56 : 126-140, 2016

72 Dillow, M. R, "An experimental investigation of social identification on college student organ donor decisions" 33 (33): 239-246, 2016

73 Fisher, R. J, "An empathy-helping perspective on consumers' responses to fund-raising appeals" 35 (35): 519-531, 2008

74 Kopfman, J. E, "Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages" 26 (26): 279-300, 1998

75 Aronoff, J, "Affect regulation and the breadth of interpersonal engagement" 67 (67): 105-114, 1994

76 Sun, H. J, "A study on the development of public campaign messages for organ donation promotion in Korea" 30 (30): 903-918, 2015

77 Okada, I, "A review of theoretical studies on indirect reciprocity" 11 (11): 27-, 2020

78 Reese, P. P, "A randomized trial of theory-informed appeals for organ donor registration using Internet advertisements" 5 (5): 2238-2245, 2020

79 Hartmann, G. W, "A field experiment on the comparative effectiveness of"emotional"and"rational"political leaflets in determining election results" 31 (31): 99-114, 1936

80 국립장기조직혈액관리원, "2019년도 장기 등 이식 및 인체조직 기증 통계연보"

81 Seu, B. I, "'Your stomach makes you feel that you don't want to know anything about it': Desensitization, defence mechanisms and rhetoric in response to human rights abuses" 2 (2): 183-196, 2003