복강경보조질자궁절제술과 복강경전자궁절제술의 수술결과 비교 = Comparison of surgical outcomes after Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and total Laparoscopic hysterectomy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Methods: The data were collected retrospectively from hospital records. Between September 2006 and August 2007, Patients undergone with LAVH (93 cases) and TLH (142 cases) with pathologic reports of leiomyoma or adenomyosis were enrolled. The characteristics and surgical results were compared according to the operation type. The correlations among the variables were analyzed with multiple linear regression. Results: Between two groups, the characteristics of patients were similar such as age, body mass index, surgical history, and pathologic findings. In the univariate analysis, the differences of operation duration and blood loss between LAVH (129.0±34.5 min, 385.5±296.1 mL) and TLH (123.6±40.8 min, 294.7±285.4 mL) were significant (P<0.050). Specimen weight was slightly heavier in LAVH (378.7±211.7 g vs. 316.9±170.1 g, P=0.060), Admission duration (5.63±1.61 day vs. 5.71±1.61 day) and the incidence of complications (10.8% vs. 14.0%) were indifferent to the groups (LAVH vs. TLH, P>0.050). In multivariate analysis, blood loss was correlated with operation duration and specimen weight (P=0.000) but not with operation type (P=0.213). Conclusions: LAVH tends to be selected in larger uteri and results in more blood loss and longer operation duration. Operation type (LAVH or TLH) does not affect blood loss which is related with operation duration and uterine weight.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한호섭, "양성 자궁병변에 대한 세 가지 다른 자궁적출술 접근 방법" 대한산부인과학 id= 50 (50): 769-775, 2007

2 장문건, "골반경하 질식 전자궁적출술 (LAVH)과 골반경하 전자궁적출술 (TLH)의 비교 연구" 대한산부인과학회 48 (48): 143-152, 2005

3 박현정, "골반경하 전자궁적출술 (TLH)과 골반경하 질식 전자궁적출술 (LAVTH) 및 복식 전자궁적출술 (TAH)에 관한 임상적 고찰" 대한산부인과학회 49 (49): 644-652, 2006

4 박평식, "골반경을 이용한 자궁적출술의 방법에 따른 비교 분석" 42 : 8-13, 1999

5 Sheth SS, "Vaginal hysterectomy" 19 : 307-332, 2005

6 Fiaccavento A, "Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in cases of very large uteri: A retrospective comparative study" 14 : 559-563, 2007

7 Health Care Technology Institute, "The importance of indirect benefits when evaluating new medical technologies: a case study. The institute. Publication No.:PB95-11"

8 Johnson N, "Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease" 25 : CD003677-, 2005

9 Karaman Y, "Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy; Experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon" 14 : 78-84, 2007

10 Spilsbury K, "Persistent high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-based study of 83000 procedures over 23 years" 113 : 804-809, 2006

11 Mäkinen J, "Morbidity of 10110 hysterectomies by type of approach" 16 : 1473-1478, 2001

12 Cook JR, "Laparovaginal hysterectomy: A decade of evolution" 44 : 111-116, 2004

13 Marana R, "Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study" 180 (180): 270-275, 1999

14 Reich H, "Laparoscopic hysterectomy" 5 : 213-216, 1989

15 Garry R, "Laparoscopic hysterectomy" Blackwell Scientific Publication 79-, 1993

16 Wilcox LS, "Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990" 83 : 549-555, 1994

17 Hill DJ, "Complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy" 1 : 159-162, 1994

18 Long Cy, "Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy" 53 : 214-219, 2002

19 Leung SW, "Comparison of the different types of laparoscopic total hysterectomy" 14 : 91-96, 2007

20 Kim DH, "Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopicassisted vaginal hysterectomy" 5 : 253-260, 1998

21 Munro MG, "A classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy" 82 (82): 624-629, 1993