문화재보호제도와 전통 담론 = The Protection System of Cultural Property and the Discourse of Tradition

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this paper is to examine how the 'tradition' has been identified and used concretely on the protection system of cultural property. Firstly, this paper investigated the historical process and aspects that the 'cultural property' and the 'tradition' combined, each had different meaning at the beginning. And it investigated the linkage of them which effect to the protection system and to each other on the system operated. Then, it pointed out a rift within the discourse of tradition to which the system have held on, and the problems as its result. This paper applied the viewpoint of anti-essentialism that the tradition is presented with hegemonic act to raise the inevitable continuity with the past, instead of the common notion that the tradition is 'everything that is handed down from the past.' Because the cultural property is the product of the state system, to pursne the linkage of it and the tradition is identical to examine how the tradition have been officially defined in the national hegemony. Since the 1920s the tradition has defined as a fixed, essential, pure reality in the changing process of the protection system of cultural property. This essentialist viewpoint about the tradition have been continued as the institutional premise regardless of many critics, raised by studies focusing on the culture and cultural property. But we see now a rift on the discourse of tradition as the intellectual discourse has been supported to the system, that is caused by the fast-changing global economic environment and a rat race around the registration of intangible cultural heritage of UNESCO.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조지훈, "조지훈전집 6" 일지사 1973

2 정수진, "무형문화재의 탄생" 역사비평사 2008

3 임재해, "무형문화재의 가치 재인식과 창조적 계승" 한국민속학회 45 : 237-285, 2007

4 정수진, "무형문화재에서 무형문화유산으로 －글로벌 시대의 문화 표상－" 동아시아문화연구소 (53) : 91-116, 2013

5 전승주, "1950년대 한국 문학비평 연구 '전통론'과 '민족문학론'을 중심으로" 민족문학사학회 23 : 300-331, 2003