시민의 교통법규 준수행위에의 영향요인 = Factors to Influence Public Compliance with Traffic Law

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구의 목적은 시민의 교통법규 준수행위에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하고, 시민들이 교통법규를 자발적으로 준수하도록하기 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하는 것이다. 이 연구는 특별시 및 광역시에 거주하는 455명의 시민들을 대상으로 ⑴ 경찰 효과성 인식, ⑵ 절차적 공정성 인식, ⑶ 사회적 정체성 인식, ⑷ 법률 정당성 인식, ⑸ 인구사회학적 요인(성별, 연령, 소득수준)들 중에서 어떤 요인들이 시민의 교통법규 준수행위에 영향을 미치는지를 분석하였다. 4개 항목으로 구성된 경찰 효과성 변수와 독립변수들을 투입한 Step 2는 사회적 정체성(β=.220, p<.001)과 법률 정당성(β=.115, p<.05)이 시민의 교통법규 준수행위에 유의한 영향을 준다는 것을 보여주었고, “경찰은 교통질서를 잘 유지한다”라는 단일 항목의 경찰 효과성 변수와 다른 독립변수들을 투입한 Step 3는 사회적 정체성(β=.220, p<.001), 경찰 효과성(β=.178, p<.001), 법률 정당성(β=.115, p<.05)이 시민의 교통법규 준수행위에 유의한 영향을 준다는 것을 보여주었다. 따라서, 경찰관리자는 시민들로 하여금 교통법규를 준수하도록 하기 위하여 시민들의 사회적 정체성 인식을 강화하고, 경찰 효과성 인식을 증진시키고, 법률 정당성 인식을 높일 필요가 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the factors to influence the public compliance with traffic law, and to suggest the policy implications to encourage the public to comply with traffic law. Using data collected from a sample of 455 citizens of metropolitan cities in South Korea, this study analyzes which factors have the effects on the public compliance with traffic law. Step 2 demonstrates that perception of social identity(β=.220, p<.001) and perception of legal legitimacy(β =.115, p<.05) have the significant effects on public compliance with traffic law. and Step 3 incorporating a single-item police effectiveness variable demonstrates that perception of social identity(β=.220, p<.001), perception of police effectiveness(β=.178, p<.001), perception of law legitimacy(β=.115, p<.05) have the significant effects on public compliance with traffic law.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서 론 2. 이론적 배경 3. 연구설계 및 연구방법 4. 분석 결과 및 논의 5. 정책적 함의 및 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 류준혁, "절차적 공정성과 정당성 확보가 시민의 법준수 인식에 미치는 영향" 치안정책연구소 29 (29): 133-165, 2015

2 송영주, "애착 외상과 데이트 폭력 피해의 관계에서 사회적 지지의 조절효과" 한국범죄심리학회 13 (13): 111-140, 2017

3 A. Van Damme, "Why are young adults willing to cooperate with the police and comply with traffic laws? Examining the role of attitudes toward the police and law, perceived deterrence and personal morality" 46 : 103-116, 2016

4 J. Jackson, "Why Do People Comply With the Law?: Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions" 52 (52): 1051-1071, 2012

5 J. Jackson, "Why Do People Comply With the Law?: Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions" 52 (52): 1051-1071, 2012

6 T. R. Tyler, "Trust in the law:Encouraging public cooperation with the police and court" Russell Sage Foundation 2002

7 E. A. Lind, "The social psychology of procedural justice" Plenum 1988

8 E. A. Lind, "The social psychology of procedural justice" Plenum Press

9 M. Hough, "The drivers of police legitimacy: some European research" 8 (8): 144-165, 2013

10 Heather J. Smith, "The Self-Relevant Implications of the Group-Value Model: Group Membership, Self-Worth, and Treatment Quality" 34 : 471-, 1998

11 J. Sunshine, "The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing" 37 (37): 519-, 2003

12 J. Sunshine, "The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing" 37 (37): 513-548, 2003

13 Tom R. Tyler, "The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities" 1 (1): 328-, 1997

14 G. S. Leventhal, "Social Exchange:Advances in Theory and Research" Plenum 1980

15 T. R. Tyler, "Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation" 57 : 375-400, 2006

16 J. Thiabut, "Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis" Erlbaum 1975

17 Justice Tankebe, "Policing, procedural fairness and public behavior: a review and critique" 11 (11): 11-, 2009

18 A. Cherney, "Policing terrorism with procedural justice: The role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy" 46 (46): 403-421, 2013

19 A. Cherney, "Policing terrorism with procedural justice: The role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy" 46 (46): 403-421, 2013

20 B. Bradford, "Policing and social identity : Procedural justice, inclusion, and cooperation between police and public" 24 (24): 22-43, 2014

21 B. Bradford, "Officers as Mirrors: Policing, Procedural Justice and the (Re)Production of Social Identity (October 9, 2013)" 2013

22 K. Murph, "Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?" 3 : 1-26, 2009

23 J. Sunshine, "Moral Solidarity, Identification with the Community, and the Importance of Procedural Justice: The Police as Prototypical Representatives of a Group’s Moral Values" 66 (66): 153-, 2003

24 T. Tyler, "Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration" Oxford University Press 2013

25 A. Bottoms, "Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration" Oxford University Press 2013

26 J. Jackson, "Legitimacy and Compliance in Criminal Justice" Routledge 2012

27 D. Dixon, "Law in Policing: Legal Regulation and Police Practices" Oxford University Press 1997

28 A. Myhill, "It’s a fair cop? Police legitimacy, public cooperation, and crime reduction: An interpretative evidence commentary" 11 : 2011

29 A. Myhill, "It’s a fair cop? Police legitimacy, public cooperation, and crime reduction: An interpretative evidence commentary" 12 : 2011

30 M. Hertogh, "Geen woorden maar daden. De invloed van legitimiteit en vertrouwen op her nalevingsgedrag van verkeer-sovertreders" 34 (34): 89-111, 2013

31 K. Murphy, "Fostering cooperation with the police: How do ethnic minorities in Australia respond to procedural justice-based policing" 44 (44): 235-257, 2011

32 T. R. Tyler, "Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, And Behavioral Engagement" Psychology Press 2000

33 T. R. Tyler, "Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, And Behavioral Engagement" Psychology Press 2000

34 T. R. Tyler, "Building a law-abiding society: Taking public views about morally and the legitimacy of legal authorities into account when formulating substantive law" 28 : 707-739, 2000

35 A. Bottom, "Beyond Procedural: A Dialogue Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice" 102 : 119-170, 2012