RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중국의 전통협상술과 현대외교협상 = The Traditional Negotiation-skills and Modern Diplomatic Negotiations in China

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The Chinese traditional way of thinking have been the reality-oriented and multi-layered structure. So, Their characteristic is that exclude extreme judgments about things, have the flexibility and the agility. This multi-values are utilized as a benefit for that prove the flexibility and adaptation to circumstances on the diplomatic negotiations. The Chinese owing to regard that negotiation is fight of spirit and technique, to create a favorable conditions, to control the opponent by a force, they prepares thoroughly in advance, adhere the method which advances an agreement from the home country. Because they also recognize that the essence of the negotiations is a mind reading, they carefully research the technique which reads the minds of opponents, hide deep inside oneself. In this psychological warfare, the time-variable influences to agreement result, the Chinese who has the traditionally strong patience, to take advantage of the time variable is very skillful. As the Face-people, they highlights to focus on protocols and formats, proficient in obtain of the utilitarian, favorite use the poetic expression of characteristics of Chinese and an indirect expression. These characteristics of Chinese negotiating can be called a standardized cultural phenomenon which multi-values and the merchants-mind are mixed. The traditional cultural through a socialistic-values be reinterpreted, are going to have a new creation of characteristic pattern of negotiations in China.
      번역하기

      The Chinese traditional way of thinking have been the reality-oriented and multi-layered structure. So, Their characteristic is that exclude extreme judgments about things, have the flexibility and the agility. This multi-values are utilized as a bene...

      The Chinese traditional way of thinking have been the reality-oriented and multi-layered structure. So, Their characteristic is that exclude extreme judgments about things, have the flexibility and the agility. This multi-values are utilized as a benefit for that prove the flexibility and adaptation to circumstances on the diplomatic negotiations. The Chinese owing to regard that negotiation is fight of spirit and technique, to create a favorable conditions, to control the opponent by a force, they prepares thoroughly in advance, adhere the method which advances an agreement from the home country. Because they also recognize that the essence of the negotiations is a mind reading, they carefully research the technique which reads the minds of opponents, hide deep inside oneself. In this psychological warfare, the time-variable influences to agreement result, the Chinese who has the traditionally strong patience, to take advantage of the time variable is very skillful. As the Face-people, they highlights to focus on protocols and formats, proficient in obtain of the utilitarian, favorite use the poetic expression of characteristics of Chinese and an indirect expression. These characteristics of Chinese negotiating can be called a standardized cultural phenomenon which multi-values and the merchants-mind are mixed. The traditional cultural through a socialistic-values be reinterpreted, are going to have a new creation of characteristic pattern of negotiations in China.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김기홍, "한국인은 왜 항상 협상에서 지는가" 굿인포메이션 2005

      2 채희준, "중국의 협상술(1)" (212) : 1996

      3 민귀식, "중국 외교협상에서 전통문화요인의 영향력 탐색" 아태지역연구센터 33 (33): 61-91, 2009

      4 마중가, "중국 대외협상책략의 비교문화적 연구" 1999

      5 이상우, "동양미학론" SIGONGART 2006

      6 王再華, "鬼谷子 商學院" 經濟管理出版社 2008

      7 鄭華, "首腦外交--中美領導人談判的話語分析 1969-1972" 上海世紀出版集團 2008

      8 齊鵬飛, "這裏沒有李鴻章--鄧小平與中英兩國政府關于香港問題的外交談判"

      9 宋連生, "讀黨史 學談判" 江西人民出版社 2008

      10 杜邦, "談判的藝術" 中國文聯出版公司 1992

      1 김기홍, "한국인은 왜 항상 협상에서 지는가" 굿인포메이션 2005

      2 채희준, "중국의 협상술(1)" (212) : 1996

      3 민귀식, "중국 외교협상에서 전통문화요인의 영향력 탐색" 아태지역연구센터 33 (33): 61-91, 2009

      4 마중가, "중국 대외협상책략의 비교문화적 연구" 1999

      5 이상우, "동양미학론" SIGONGART 2006

      6 王再華, "鬼谷子 商學院" 經濟管理出版社 2008

      7 鄭華, "首腦外交--中美領導人談判的話語分析 1969-1972" 上海世紀出版集團 2008

      8 齊鵬飛, "這裏沒有李鴻章--鄧小平與中英兩國政府關于香港問題的外交談判"

      9 宋連生, "讀黨史 學談判" 江西人民出版社 2008

      10 杜邦, "談判的藝術" 中國文聯出版公司 1992

      11 朱國定, "談判學" 立信會計出版社 2005

      12 苟君邁, "毛澤東與孫子兵法" 中國檔案出版社

      13 禹志蘭, "毛澤東以弱勝强謀略" 中央文獻出版社 2004

      14 王永昌, "曆史的博弈" 上海文化出版社 2006

      15 Guy Olivier Faure, "文化與談判—解決水爭端" 社會科學文獻出版社 2001

      16 羅昕, "從中美建交談判看當代中國外交談判方式" 外交學院 2002

      17 鄭華, "對外談判中的權力研究-以中美關系解凍的系列談判爲例(1969-1972)" (4) : 2007

      18 陳昆福, "孫子兵法與現代商戰論" 浙江人民出版社 2008

      19 戴茂堂, "傳統價值觀念與當代中國" 湖北人民出版社 2001

      20 陳明福, "伐謀者戒---外交大敗局" 中原農民出版社 2003

      21 秦曉鷹, "中國外交的文化內涵" (1) : 2007

      22 基辛格, "『白宮歲月』, 第四卷" 商務印書館 2003

      23 "『毛澤東選集』第二卷" 人民出版社 1991

      24 Alfred D. Wilhelm, Jr., "The Chinese at the Negotiating Table : Style and Characteristics" National Defense University Press 1994

      25 N. J. Adler, "International Dimension of Organizational Behavior" Kent Publishing co. 1986

      26 Frank A. Ninkovich, "Culture in U. S Foreign Policy Since 1900" Culture and International Relations 1990

      27 Ali A. Mazrui, "Cultural Forces in World Politics, New Hampshire" Heinemann Educational Books, Inc. 1990

      28 Earl H. Fry, "America the Vincible : U.S. Foreign policy for the Twenty First Century" New Jersey 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-08-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Modern China Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.73 0.73 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.76 0.72 0.939 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼