핵군축 거버넌스와 시민사회：핵확산금지조약(NPT) 평가회의와 국제NGO의 역할 = Nuclear Disarmament Governance and Civil Society: Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conferences and the Role of International NGOs

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this research is to analyze how international non-governmental organizations(INGOs) contributed to the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT) Review Conference in order to explore the role of civil society in nuclear disarmament governance. As a background case, this paper also examines the role and contribution of INGOs in the 2000 NPT Review Conference. In the case of the 2000 Review Conference, INGOs largely contributed to setting the issue of nuclear disarmament again on the agenda of international security governance. They also took part in promoting the international norm of nuclear disarmament. In addition, they played an important role in reaching a substantial agreement on nuclear disarmament among member states in the Conference by actively engaging in advocacy and lobbying activities designed to support and advertise the position of the New Agenda Coalition in favor of global nuclear disarmament.
In the case of the 2010 Review Conference, INGOs drafted a Nuclear Weapons Convention as a starting point toward its conclusion, This role contributed to forming a basis on which to promote the norm of nuclear disarmament and to develop it into an international regime. They also took part in inducing member states to adopt the issue of a nuclear weapons convention as one of the key agenda in the conference and to actively negotiate with each other. Furthermore, INGOs successfully pushed member states to include the term, ‘nuclear weapons convention’ and its related content in the final document of the conference. In addition, INGOs played a role in causing member states to reach a concrete agreement on a nuclear free zone in Middle East.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 논문은 핵군축 거버넌스에 있어 시민사회의 역할을 파악하기 위해 2010년 핵확산금지조약(NPT) 평가회의와 관련하여 국제NGO들이 어떠한 역할과 기여를 해왔는지를 분석한다. 이러한 분석의 배경사례로서 2000년 NPT 평가회의도 분석한다. 우선 2000년 평가회의와 관련해서 국제NGO들은 초국적 네트워크를 결성하여 핵군축문제를 주요 의제로 재설정하는데 상당한 기여를 하였다. 또한 핵군축 국제규범을 촉진시키는데 중요한 역할을 담당하였다. 그리고 핵군축을 추진하는 신의제연합(NAC)의 입장을 지지하고 홍보하는 주창활동과 자국 정부들이 NAC의 입장을 지지하도록 설득하는 로비활동을 통해서 핵군축에 관한 최종합의를 이끌어내는데 기여하였다.
2010년 평가회의에서는 국제NGO들은 궁극적으로 핵무기금지협약이 창출되기 위한 시발점으로서 협약의 구체적인 내용을 마련함으로써 핵무기금지 규범을 촉진하고 국제레짐으로 발전시키기 위한 토대를 마련하는데 기여하였다. 그리고 처음으로 회원국들이 평가회의에서 핵무기금지협약을 주요 의제로 채택하여 집중적으로 협상하도록 유도하는 역할을 하였다. 또한 핵무기금지협약을 NPT 평가회의 역사상 처음으로 최종문서에 언급하며 관련내용을 명시하는데 일조하였다. 게다가 국제NGO들은 중동 비핵지대에 관한 구체적인 합의가 이루어지도록 촉진하는 역할을 하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김현, "인간안보에 있어서 중견국의 역할과 신외교：국민보호책임(R2P) 국제규범사례를 중심으로, In 지구화 시대 지역협력 네트워크의 모색" 1-15, 2009

2 김현, "국제안보에 있어 중견국(middle power)외교: 핵군축 문제사례분석" 인문사회과학연구소 1 (1): 4-48, 2008

3 김현, "국가와 지구시민사회간 협력의 시안적(試案的) 모델: 국제안보에서의 국제NGO와의 협력을 중심으로" 인문사회과학연구소 (30) : 5-42, 2011

4 Potter, William, "“The 2010 NPT Review Conference: Deconstructiong Consensus.” James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies Report"

5 WMDC(Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission), "Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Arms. Report by WMDC"

6 Johnson, Rebecca, "Towards Nuclear Disarmament, In Nuclear Disarmament in the Twenty-first Century" Hiroshima Peace Institute 30-47, 2004

7 Shultz, George, "Toward A Nuclear-Free World" 2008

8 Ban, Ki-moon, "The United Nations and Security in a Nuclear-weapon-free World" Secretary-General’s Address to the East-West Institute

9 Bolton, Mattew, "The Role of Middle Power-NGO Coalitions in Global Policy: The Case of the Cluster Munitions Ban" 1 (1): 172-184, 2010

10 MacFhionnbhairr, Darach, "The New Agenda Coalition, In Nuclear Disarmament in the Twenty-first Century" Hiroshima Peace Institute 275-286, 2004

11 Potter, William, "The NPT Review Conference: 188 States in Search of Consensus" (3) : 19-31, 2005

12 Ungerer, Carl, "The Force of Ideas: Middle Power Diplomacy and the New Agenda for Nuclear Disarmament, In The Politics of Nuclear Non-Proliferation" Australian National University 187-204, 2001

13 Rutherford, Kenneth, "The Evolving Arms Control Agenda: Implications of the Role of NGOs in Banning Antipersonal Landmines" 53 : 74-114, 2000

14 Obama, Barak, "Speech in Prague, Czech Republic"

15 IPPNW(International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War), "Securing Our Survival: The Case for a Nuclear Weapons Convention" IPPNW 2007

16 Slater, Alice, "Report on the Morning NGO Abolition Caucus: Insomniacs for Peace"

17 Canberra Commission, "Report on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons"

18 The 2010 Review Conference of the NPT, "Report of Main Committee I: Chairman’s Draft on Substantive Elements"

19 Hanson, Marianne, "Regulating the Possession and Use of Nuclear Weapons: Ideas, Commissions, and Agency in International Security Politics: The Case of the Canberra Commission, In International Commissions and The Power of Ideas" United Nations Press 2005

20 MPI, "Recommendation to the 2010 NPT Review Conference"

21 Johnson, Rebecca, "Politics and Protection: Why the 2005 NPT Review Conference Failed" (80) : 2005

22 Pugwash, "Perspectives for Progress: The 2010 NPT Review Conference and Beyond" 2010

23 U. S. Department of Defense, "Nuclear Posture Review(NPR) Report"

24 Datan, Merav, "Nuclear Norms: Prohibitions, Postitivism, and Realism, In Reframing The Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security Policy" Praeger 2003

25 Wright, Tim, "Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference 2010: Towards Nuclear Abolition. A Report by The ICAN(International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons)"

26 Finnemore, Martha, "National Interests in International Society" Cornell University Press 1996

27 Kelly, Alison, "NPT: Back on Track"

28 Ahmed, Shamima, "NGOs in International Politics" Kumarian Press 2006

29 Ware, Alyn, "NGO and Government Cooperation in Setting the Disarmament Agenda: The Impact of the 1996 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion, In Reframing The Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security Policy" Praeger 2003

30 Carroll, Simon, "NGO Access to Multilateral Fora: Dose Disarmament Lag Behind" UNIDR 2 (2): 15-26, 2002

31 Finnemore, Martha, "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change" 52 (52): 887-917, 1998

32 Ban, Ki-moon, "For a Nuclear Free, Peaceful, Just and Sustainable World" 2010

33 Ungerer, Carl, "Following the Leader: The Canberra Commission and the (Renewed) Case for Eliminating Nuclear Weapons" (33) : 1998

34 The 2010 Review Conference of the NPT, "Final Document"

35 Dhanapala, Jayantha, "Evaluating the 2010 NPT Review Conference" The United States Institute of Peace 2010

36 NAM(Non-Aligned Movement), "Elements for a Plan of Action for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons to the NPT"

37 Tyson, Rhianna, "Contextualizing Past, Present and Future Challenges to the NPT Regime" 57-67, 2004

38 Acheson, Ray, "Beyond the 2010 NPT Review Conference: What’s Next for Nuclear Disarmament" 66 (66): 77-87, 2010

39 Shultz, George, "A World Free of Nuclear Weapons" 2007

40 Muller, Harald, "A Treaty in Troubled Waters: Reflections on the Failed NPT Review Conference" (3) : 33-44, 2005

41 Green, Robert, "A Fast Track to Zero Nuclear Weapons: The Middle Powers Initiatives and the New Agenda Coalition" 16 (16): 24-36, 2000

42 MPI(Middle Powers Initiatives), "28 States Participate in Inaugural. “Article VI Forum” MPI Report and Brief"

43 외교통상부, "2000년 핵무기 비확산조약(NPT) 평가회의 참가결과보고" 외교통상부 2000