RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    SCOPUS KCI등재

    폴립절제 후 추적대장내시경검사 가이드라인 = SPECIAL REVIEW : Korean Guidelines for Post-polypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101520915

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Post-polypectomy surveillance has become a major indication for colonoscopy as a result of increased use of screening colonoscopy in Korea. However, because the medical resource is limited, and the first screening colonoscopy produces the greatest effect on reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer, there is aneed to increase the efficiency of postpolypectomy surveillance. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was used to address all available evidences to delineate the predictors for advanced neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy. Based on the results of review of the evidences, we elucidated the high risk findings of the index colonoscopy as follows: 1) 3 or more adenomas, 2) any adenoma larger than 10 mm, 3) any tubulovillous or villous adenoma, 4) any adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, and 5) any serrated polyps larger than 10 mm. In patients without any high-risk findings at the index colonoscopy, surveillance colonoscopy should be performed five years after index colonoscopy. In patients with one or more high risk findings, surveillance colonoscopy should be performed three years after polypectomy. However, the surveillance interval can be shortened considering the quality of the index colonoscopy, the completeness of polyp removal, the patient`s general condition, and family and medical history. This practical guideline cannot totally take the place of clinical judgments made by practitioners and should be revised and supplemented in the future as new evidence becomes available. (Intest Res 2012;10:89-109)
    번역하기

    Post-polypectomy surveillance has become a major indication for colonoscopy as a result of increased use of screening colonoscopy in Korea. However, because the medical resource is limited, and the first screening colonoscopy produces the greatest eff...

    Post-polypectomy surveillance has become a major indication for colonoscopy as a result of increased use of screening colonoscopy in Korea. However, because the medical resource is limited, and the first screening colonoscopy produces the greatest effect on reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer, there is aneed to increase the efficiency of postpolypectomy surveillance. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was used to address all available evidences to delineate the predictors for advanced neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy. Based on the results of review of the evidences, we elucidated the high risk findings of the index colonoscopy as follows: 1) 3 or more adenomas, 2) any adenoma larger than 10 mm, 3) any tubulovillous or villous adenoma, 4) any adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, and 5) any serrated polyps larger than 10 mm. In patients without any high-risk findings at the index colonoscopy, surveillance colonoscopy should be performed five years after index colonoscopy. In patients with one or more high risk findings, surveillance colonoscopy should be performed three years after polypectomy. However, the surveillance interval can be shortened considering the quality of the index colonoscopy, the completeness of polyp removal, the patient`s general condition, and family and medical history. This practical guideline cannot totally take the place of clinical judgments made by practitioners and should be revised and supplemented in the future as new evidence becomes available. (Intest Res 2012;10:89-109)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 강문수, "용종절제술 후 대장내시경 추적검사 시기에 관한 설문 조사" 대한소화기내시경학회 33 (33): 339-345, 2006

    2 박세영, "용종 절제술 후 확인된 대장직장 용종의 간과율" 대한소화기내시경학회 36 (36): 132-137, 2008

    3 김진배, "대장용종절제술 후 용종의 재발률 및 추적 검사 시기" 대한소화기학회 44 (44): 77-83, 2004

    4 최규용, "대장내시경의 대장직장 용종 및 선종의 간과율" 대한소화기내시경학회 26 (26): 199-204, 2003

    5 정춘식, "대장내시경 검사에서 용종의 간과율" 대한소화기내시경학회 28 (28): 179-182, 2004

    6 Ferretti G, "there a right-sided shift for colorectal cancer in women compared with men?" 15 : 1054-, 2006

    7 Zhang J, "What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes" 280 : 1690-1691, 1998

    8 Laiyemo AO, "Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial" 7 : 562-567, 2009

    9 Robertson DJ, "Using the results of a baseline and a surveillance colonoscopy to predict recurrent adenomas with high-risk characteristics" 151 : 103-109, 2009

    10 Health Insurance Policy Research Institute, The National Health Insurance Corporation, "Trend of studies about economic evaluation of the cancer screening programs"

    1 강문수, "용종절제술 후 대장내시경 추적검사 시기에 관한 설문 조사" 대한소화기내시경학회 33 (33): 339-345, 2006

    2 박세영, "용종 절제술 후 확인된 대장직장 용종의 간과율" 대한소화기내시경학회 36 (36): 132-137, 2008

    3 김진배, "대장용종절제술 후 용종의 재발률 및 추적 검사 시기" 대한소화기학회 44 (44): 77-83, 2004

    4 최규용, "대장내시경의 대장직장 용종 및 선종의 간과율" 대한소화기내시경학회 26 (26): 199-204, 2003

    5 정춘식, "대장내시경 검사에서 용종의 간과율" 대한소화기내시경학회 28 (28): 179-182, 2004

    6 Ferretti G, "there a right-sided shift for colorectal cancer in women compared with men?" 15 : 1054-, 2006

    7 Zhang J, "What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes" 280 : 1690-1691, 1998

    8 Laiyemo AO, "Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial" 7 : 562-567, 2009

    9 Robertson DJ, "Using the results of a baseline and a surveillance colonoscopy to predict recurrent adenomas with high-risk characteristics" 151 : 103-109, 2009

    10 Health Insurance Policy Research Institute, The National Health Insurance Corporation, "Trend of studies about economic evaluation of the cancer screening programs"

    11 Pinsky PF, "The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination" 7 : 86-92, 2009

    12 Ministry for Health, Walfare and Family Affairs, "The quality guidelines of colorectal cancer screening"

    13 Hiraoka S, "The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal cancer" 139 : 1503-1510, 2010

    14 Lebwohl B, "The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy" 73 : 1207-1214, 2011

    15 Ben-Horin S, "The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy" 102 : 2680-2685, 2007

    16 Terdiman JP, "Surveillance guidelines should be updated to recognize the importance of serrated polyps" 139 : 1444-1447, 2010

    17 Davila RE, "Standards of Practice Committee, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance" 63 : 546-557, 2006

    18 Levin B, "Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology" 134 : 1570-1595, 2008

    19 Leggett B, "Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis" 138 : 2088-2100, 2010

    20 Lund JN, "Risks, costs, and compliance limit colorectal adenoma surveillance: lessons from a randomised trial" 49 : 91-96, 2001

    21 Nusko G, "Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy" 51 : 424-428, 2002

    22 Yamaji Y, "Right-side shift of colorectal adenomas with aging" 63 : 453-458, 2006

    23 Hwang ST, "Relationship of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to colorectal adenomatous polyps" 25 : 562-567, 2010

    24 Huang Y, "Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population" 45 : 838-845, 2010

    25 Seo GJ, "Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps" 16 : 2806-2811, 2010

    26 Winawer SJ, "Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup" 328 : 901-906, 1993

    27 Park SY, "Proximal shift in the distribution of adenomatous polyps in Korea over the past ten years" 56 : 677-681, 2009

    28 Urso E, "Proximal colon cancer in patients aged 51-60 years of age should be tested for microsatellites instability. A comment on the Revised Bethesda Guidelines" 23 : 801-806, 2008

    29 Schreiner MA, "Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia" 139 : 1497-1502, 2010

    30 Brenner H, "Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study" 154 : 22-30, 2011

    31 Hixson LJ, "Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps" 37 : 125-127, 1991

    32 Winawer SJ, "Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup" 329 : 1977-1981, 1993

    33 Bertario L, "Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients" 105 : 82-87, 2003

    34 Laiyemo AO, "Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years" 148 : 419-426, 2008

    35 Thiis-Evensen E, "Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I" 34 : 414-420, 1999

    36 Korea National Statistical Office, "Population Projections for Korea: 2005-2050 (Based on the 2005 Census)"

    37 Bond JH, "Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology" 95 : 3053-3063, 2000

    38 Nivatvongs S, "Piecemeal snare excision of large sessile colon and rectal polyps: is it adequate?" 30 : 18-20, 1984

    39 Yang G, "Pathologic features of initial adenomas as predictors for metachronous adenomas of the rectum" 90 : 1661-1665, 1998

    40 Stryker SJ, "Natural history of untreated colonic polyps" 93 : 1009-1013, 1987

    41 Hisabe T, "Natural history of small colorectal protuberant adenomas" 22 (22): S43-S46, 2010

    42 The National Health Insurance Corporation, "National Health Insurance Statistical Yearbook for 2009"

    43 Heresbach D, "Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies" 40 : 284-290, 2008

    44 Sawhney MS, "Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers" 131 : 1700-1705, 2006

    45 Lu FI, "Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenomas of the colorectum: an increased risk for subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma" 34 : 927-934, 2010

    46 Atkin WS, "Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas" 326 : 658-662, 1992

    47 Seitz U, "Long-term results of endoscopic removal of large colorectal adenomas" 35 : S41-S44, 2003

    48 Laiyemo AO, "Likelihood of missed and recurrent adenomas in the proximal versus the distal colon" 74 : 253-261, 2011

    49 Zlatanic J, "Large sessile colonic adenomas: use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy" 49 : 731-735, 1999

    50 Lee BH, "Korean national recommendation guidelines on screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal cancers" 45 : 981-991, 2002

    51 Rabeneck L, "Is there a true "shift" to the right colon in the incidence of colorectal cancer?" 98 : 1400-1409, 2003

    52 Kim JH, "Influence of the insertion time and number of polyps on miss rate in colonoscopy" 46 : 634-639, 2011

    53 Saini SD, "Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review" 64 : 614-626, 2006

    54 Yamaji Y, "Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese" 53 : 568-572, 2004

    55 Rapuri S, "Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening--review of literature" 23 : 453-459, 2008

    56 Hofstad B, "Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years" 39 : 449-456, 1996

    57 Guyatt GH, "GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations" 336 : 924-926, 2008

    58 Atkins D, "GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations" 328 : 1490-, 2004

    59 Chung SJ, "Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans" 60 : 1537-1543, 2011

    60 Lieberman DA, "Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy" 133 : 1077-1085, 2007

    61 Bonithon-Kopp C, "European Cancer Prevention Organisation Study Group. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence" 47 : 323-333, 2004

    62 Hoff G, "Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection" 21 : 853-862, 1986

    63 Chen SC, "Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy" 102 : 856-861, 2007

    64 Walsh RM, "Endoscopic resection of large sessile colorectal polyps" 38 : 303-309, 1992

    65 Brooker JC, "Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps by specialist and non-specialist endoscopists" 89 : 1020-1024, 2002

    66 Citarda F, "Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence" 48 : 812-815, 2001

    67 Conio M, "EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps" 60 : 234-241, 2004

    68 Meagher AP, "Does colonoscopic polypectomy reduce the incidence of colorectal carcinoma?" 64 : 400-404, 1994

    69 Park DI, "Diagnostic yield of advanced colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy, according to indications: an investigation from the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)" 38 : 449-455, 2006

    70 Yoshida D, "Colorectal polypectomy and risk of colorectal cancer by subsite: the Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer study" 37 : 597-602, 2007

    71 Bensen SP, "Colorectal hyperplastic polyps and risk of recurrence of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Polyps Prevention Study" 354 : 1873-1874, 1999

    72 Schmiegel W, "Colorectal carcinoma:the management of polyps, (neo)adjuvant therapy, and the treatment of metastases" 106 : 843-848, 2009

    73 Loeve F, "Colorectal cancer risk after colonoscopic polypectomy: a population-based study and literature search" 41 : 416-422, 2005

    74 Barclay RL, "Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy" 355 : 2533-2541, 2006

    75 Schoenfeld P, "Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia" 352 : 2061-2068, 2005

    76 Saito Y, "Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection" 24 : 343-352, 2010

    77 정규원, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality and Survival in 2006-2007" 대한의학회 25 (25): 1113-1121, 2010

    78 Arain MA, "CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle" 105 : 1189-1195, 2010

    79 Cairns SR, "British Society of Gastroenterology; Association of Coloproctology for Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002)" 59 : 666-689, 2010

    80 Li D, "Association of large serrated polyps with synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia" 104 : 695-702, 2009

    81 Baxter NN, "Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer" 150 : 1-8, 2009

    82 Lim HM, "Association between non-diminutive hyperplastic polyps and synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasms" 83 : 54-59, 2011

    83 Iacopetta B., "Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?" 101 : 403-408, 2002

    84 Arditi C, "Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer" 41 : 200-208, 2009

    85 Baxter NN, "Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer" 140 : 65-72, 2011

    86 Winawer SJ, "American Cancer Society. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society" 130 : 1872-1885, 2006

    87 Noshirwani KC, "Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy" 51 : 433-437, 2000

    88 van Stolk RU, "Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group" 115 : 13-18, 1998

    89 Martínez ME, "Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas" 120 : 1077-1083, 2001

    90 Jørgensen OD, "A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study" 30 : 686-692, 1995

    91 Martínez ME, "A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy" 136 : 832-841, 2009

    92 김용길, "A Matched Case-Control Study of a Novel Acid-Pump Antagonist and Proton-Pump Inhibitor for the Treatment of Iatrogenic Ulcers Caused by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection" 거트앤리버 발행위원회 4 (4): 25-30, 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2015-03-30 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> KASID KCI등재
    2015-03-30 학회명변경 영문명 : KASID -> Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.54 0.54 0.46
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.4 0.35 0.652 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼