RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      슈만의 「크라이슬래리아나」 Op.16에서의 순환적 형식 구조에 관한 연구 = Principles of Formal Organization in R. Schumann's Kreisleriana, Op. 16

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Robert Schumann composed nearly all of his significant piano works in the decade from approximately 1829 to 1839. The majority of these exemplify traditional formal types, including three sonatas, three sets of variations, two sets of etudes, several ...

      Robert Schumann composed nearly all of his significant piano works in the decade from approximately 1829 to 1839. The majority of these exemplify traditional formal types, including three sonatas, three sets of variations, two sets of etudes, several independent pieces, and a number of collection of pieces. However, several of Schumann’s most well-known works from this period, the so-called "piano cycles," have no real precedent among works by earlier composers.
      In researching the literature on cycles, I have found no detailed analytic approaches focusing on Schumann’s formal organization in his cycles. Music historians and theorists often dismiss the importance of formal consideration in Schumann’s cycles and postulate that Schumann instinctively juxtaposed individual pieces to form a collection without much coherent organization. I, however, suggest that Schumann's cycles result from preconceived plans that govern overall tonal structure and control the formation of details, relating them to a larger context. I also suggest that Schumann's piano cycles can be divided into three types:
      1. Works such as Camaual, Op. 9, in which many brief pieces are linked by a large-scale coherent key scheme, recurring motives, and referential tonalities.
      2. Compositions like Kreisleriana, Op. 16, in which the individual movements are lengthier than in those of the first type, and for the most part display conventional forms. This type of cycle consists of fewer movements, and often suggests a conventional multi-movement arrangement such as might be found in a sonata.
      3. The third type contains only three works: the Arabeske, Blumenstuck, and Humoreske. This third type is a hybrid of the first and second types; there are fewer numbers of movements, as in type 2; but these movements are relatively shorter, as in type 1. The third type, furthermore, has other special features; these cycles are thematically unified throughout and in some respects suggest a long single movement with well-defined sections (for example, a Rondo).
      With these two suggestions, the third part of my study investigates how unity is supported on multiple levels in Schumann’s Kreisleriana. My methodology involves the following procedures:
      1. Aspects of harmonic features: Important harmonic events and keys of upcoming movements are prepared and anticipated in preceding movements. And the presence of many harmonically open structures facilitates the establishment of strong local connections between sections and movement of Kreisleriana.
      2. Principles of formal design including the relationships between the form of individual movements and the cyclic role within cycle.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼