Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background/Aims: Although the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreas adenocarcinomais high, endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is often required in other lesions; in these cases, it may bepossible to forgo initial EUS-FNA and rapid on-site cytology evaluation (ROSE). The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracyof EUS-FNB alone (EUS-FNB group) with a conventional sampling algorithm of EUS-FNA with ROSE followed by EUS-FNB(EUS-FNA/B group) in nonpancreas adenocarcinoma lesions. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of subjects who underwent EUS sampling of nonpancreatic adenocarcinoma lesions between February2011 and May 2013. Results: Over the study period, there were 43 lesions biopsied in 41 unique patients in the EUS-FNB group and 53 patients in the EUSFNA/B group. Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar between the EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA/B groups (83.7% vs. 84.9%; p=1.0). In thesubgroup of subepithelial mass lesions, diagnostic accuracy remained similar in the EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA/B groups (81.0% and 70.6%;p=0.7). EUS-FNB procedures were significantly shorter than those in the EUS-FNA/B group (58.4 minutes vs. 73.5 minutes; p<0.0001). Conclusions: EUS-FNB without on-site cytology provides a high diagnostic accuracy in nonpancreas adenocarcinoma lesions. There appearsto be no additive benefit with initial EUS-FNA but this requires further study in a prospective study.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Watson RR, "Yield and performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosing upper GI tract stromal tumors" 56 : 1757-1762, 2011

2 Krishnan K, "Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound core biopsy specimens has excellent specificity and positive predictive value for gastrointestinal lesions" 58 : 2007-2012, 2013

3 Iglesias-Garcia J, "Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses" 106 : 1705-1710, 2011

4 Dumonceau JM, "Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline" 43 : 897-912, 2011

5 Iglesias-Garcia J, "Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study" 73 : 1189-1196, 2011

6 Storch I, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions:when tissue is the issue" 22 : 86-90, 2008

7 Saftoiu A, "Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study" 42 : 117-125, 2007

8 Larghi A, "EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using a 19-gauge needle in a selected patient population: a prospective study" 74 : 504-510, 2011

9 Sepe PS, "EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal cell tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield" 70 : 254-261, 2009

10 Hewitt MJ, "EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis" 75 : 319-331, 2012

11 Kim GH, "Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonographyguided subepithelial tumor sampling" 49 : 347-354, 2014

12 Klapman JB, "Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration" 98 : 1289-1294, 2003

13 Varadarajulu S, "Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle" 76 : 336-343, 2012

14 Storch I, "Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination" 64 : 505-511, 2006