RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    도하 라운드와 WTO 투자협정 논의의 방향 = WTO DDA Negotiation and Investment Agreement

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40055556

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The 2001 Doha declaration did not launch negotiation on investment issue immediately. It says negotiation will take place after the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference on the basis of a decision to be taken, by explicit consensus, at that Session on Modalities of negotiations[i.e., how the negotiations are to be conducted]. It is still not certain whether or not a multilateral framework on investment(MFI) is eventually negotiated at the WTO. If negotiations on an MFI eventually begin, experience with the existing investment-related provisions in the WTO might prove useful. However, at the same time, the existing architecture could also pose challenges associated with issues of compatibility. The General Agreement on Trade in Service(GATS) is the WTO agreement that clearly covers foreign investment and that displays the elements of traditional investment architecture. If an MFI is negotiated, a basic question would be how to establish the relationship between the GATS and the MFI. Would an MFI just cover manufacturing? Or might Mode 3(commercial presence) of the GATS be transferred to the MFI? This paper argues that it is desirable to build a comprehensive MFI that covers investments in all sectors, though in plurilateral form. The GATS can be a good guidance as to the application of the non-discrimination principle in the MFI. But the major shortcoming of the GATS is that it does not distinguish the pre-establishment stage and post-establishment stage. A precautionary reservation is allowed, thus backsliding from the existing level of liberalization is possible. This paper suggests that the MFI needs a stronger disciplines on the post-establishment stage.
    번역하기

    The 2001 Doha declaration did not launch negotiation on investment issue immediately. It says negotiation will take place after the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference on the basis of a decision to be taken, by explicit consensus, at that Sess...

    The 2001 Doha declaration did not launch negotiation on investment issue immediately. It says negotiation will take place after the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference on the basis of a decision to be taken, by explicit consensus, at that Session on Modalities of negotiations[i.e., how the negotiations are to be conducted]. It is still not certain whether or not a multilateral framework on investment(MFI) is eventually negotiated at the WTO. If negotiations on an MFI eventually begin, experience with the existing investment-related provisions in the WTO might prove useful. However, at the same time, the existing architecture could also pose challenges associated with issues of compatibility. The General Agreement on Trade in Service(GATS) is the WTO agreement that clearly covers foreign investment and that displays the elements of traditional investment architecture. If an MFI is negotiated, a basic question would be how to establish the relationship between the GATS and the MFI. Would an MFI just cover manufacturing? Or might Mode 3(commercial presence) of the GATS be transferred to the MFI? This paper argues that it is desirable to build a comprehensive MFI that covers investments in all sectors, though in plurilateral form. The GATS can be a good guidance as to the application of the non-discrimination principle in the MFI. But the major shortcoming of the GATS is that it does not distinguish the pre-establishment stage and post-establishment stage. A precautionary reservation is allowed, thus backsliding from the existing level of liberalization is possible. This paper suggests that the MFI needs a stronger disciplines on the post-establishment stage.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-04-16 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korea Association Of Trade And Indurstry Sudies -> The Korean Association of Trade and Industry Studies KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.15 1.15 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.97 1.205 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼