조선시대의 관찰사를 통한 중앙통제에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Central-Control by Gwanchalsa in Chosun Dynasty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to review whether the central control by the Gwanchalsas had been factually achieved it`s goals in Chosun dynasty. Whether the performance of Gwanchalsa`s tasks had been successful or not affected greatly if the centralization policy of Chosun dynasty was fruitful or not.. As the Gwanchalsas in Chosun dynasty were the prime governors of 8 Do-8 Provinces, they connected directly to the King apart from the central ministries. The Gwanchalsas advised, supervised, and controlled the local officers on performing the 7 tasks of Sooryeong-the common name of the head officers of local administrative units-facilitating of farming, taxation, financing, residents welfare, education etc., and all the other governing activities. The main devices of Gwanchalsa`s central control were Sunlyeok-the round of inspection, and Popyeom-the evaluation of performance. During their Sunlyeoks, Gwanchalsas made decisions on reports and petitions, heard and examined the illegal acts of local officers, inspected the Sooryeongs of their activities, and settled all the other public affairs and private petitions. However, the number of times of Sunlyeok were reduced, and the period of it was shortened through out the latter of Chosun dynasty. Furthermore, the generalized Gwanchalsa`s holding a concurrent Suryoeng, named Mocksa or Buyun, system severely weakened the function of supervise and control by the Sunlyeok of Gwanchalsas. Popyeom was to make the important officers govern the people well by evaluating the performances of the main officers in the area. The Popyeom was needed to be done very strictly, because it was one of the most important tasks of Gwanchalsas since early of the Chosun dynasty. But the Popyeoms were not exact from the beginning, and became more and more corrupt in latter period. As these, the reduction of Sunlyeok and the corruption of Popyeom had lead the central control by the Gwanchalsas to what was not in reality. So, we can hardly see that the centralizing policy through the Gwanchalsa system in Chosun dynasty was successful.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정시채, "한국행정제도사" 법문사 1986

2 내무부, "한국지방행정사" 1965

3 이수건, "한국중세사회사연구" 일조각 1988

4 한국사회과학연구소, "한국사회론" 민음사 1981

5 국사편찬위원회, "한국사 권13" 탐구당 1977

6 진단학회, "한국사 (권1~7)" 을유문화사 1975

7 김진봉, "지방행정구역변천의 정치사회적 배경에 대한 연구" 충북대학교 호서문화 연구소 1 : 1981

8 이존희, "지방통치제도의 정비와 계수관" 동국대학교 (15) : 1981

9 구윤명, "증보전율통보" 법체처 1972

10 원영환, "조선후기의 한성부업무" 34 : 1976

11 이희권, "조선후기 관찰사와 그 통치기능" 전북대학교 사학회 9 : 1985

12 장인진, "조선후기 경상감사고 (상?중?하)" 한국도서관 협회 21 (21): 1980

13 유홍렬, "조선향약의 성립" 9 : 1936

14 이존희, "조선초기의 수령제도" 역사교육위원회 30 (30): 1982

15 이수건, "조선초기 군현제정비에 대하여" 영남대학교 1 : 1971

16 이수건, "조선전기지방행정제도의 성격" 동양학연구소 8 : 1978

17 이존희, "조선전기의 관찰사제" 서울시립대 18 : 1984

18 김옥근, "조선왕조재정연구소" 일조각 1984

19 "조선왕조實錄"

20 이수건, "조선시대지방행정사" 민음사 1989

21 이원균, "조선시대의 수령의 교체실태: 동래부사를 중심으로" 부산대학교 3 : 1979

22 이원균, "조선시대의 관찰사와 도사의 교체실태" 부산산업대학 27 : 1980

23 이존희, "조선시대 지방행정제도연구" 1990

24 이태진, "조선시대 정치사의 재조명" 범조사 1985

25 진용빈, "정약용의 환상제도개혁사상 - 다산의 복지관의 일단면-" 3 (3): 1981

26 장동희, "정약용의 행정사상" 일지사 1986

27 김윤곤, "임진란 발발직후의 지방군현실태" 1971

28 장인진, "영남낙육재고" 3 : 1978

29 "연려실기술"

30 "여지도서" 국사편찬위원회 197

31 "신성동국여지성람"

32 "속대전"

33 이수건, "세종조의 지방통치체제" 세종기념사업회 1 : 1982

34 구완회, "선생안을 통해본 조선후기의 수령" 1982

35 정도전, "삼봉집" 1961

36 "비변사담록"

37 구봉영, "백담선생문집"

38 유성원, "반계수록" 동국문화사 1958

39 유희춘, "미암일기초" 1938

40 "만기요람"

41 "대전회통"

42 "대전통편"

43 "대구부읍지"

44 "낙육재록"

45 고대민족문화연구소, "국역 대전회통" 고대민족문화연구소 1975

46 하현강, "고려지방제도의 연구" 한국사학회 13 (13): 1963

47 이희권, "고려의 군현제도와 지방통치정책, 고려사의 제문제" 삼영사

48 "경세유표"

49 "경상도지리지"

50 "경기감영계록"

51 "경국대전"