RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      로잘린드 크라우스 포스트 미디엄 이론의 이중성에 관한 변증적 고찰 = Notes on the Duality in Rosalind Krauss` Post-Medium Condition

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This essay aims to clarify the duality of (Rosalind) Krauss`` Post-Medium condition, and therein, questions how this duality works in our efforts to bring together both the post-medium art and the post-media art. The duality here derives from Krauss`` contradictory claims in her recent theories: Krauss taught us, back in 80s, the collapse of specificity in the postmodern era was ‘an expansion,’ while she’s now changed this thought, considering the same event as “a monstrous myth.” The duality also comes from the paradox that even though Krauss discredits installation (as non-art, kitch, etc.), most artists in her “crusades” against ‘the monstrous myth’ somehow involve installation, embracing media technologies. Arguably however this duality illuminates the crisis of contemporary art that fails to maintain its specifity in the cult of digital generality. As Krauss would agree, this anti-specificity in recent digital arts appears to be a repeation of the post-medium conditions whose origin can be found in the Duchampian ‘disgust’ on aesthetic traditions. Today we live on this contradiction as this paper attempts to explain and understand it. Peter Burger``s 『heory of Avant-Garde』 and Hal Foster``s 『 Who is afraid of Neo Avant-garde?』will be reviewed in that for both, the repetition and contradiction in history was a central issue. As Foster`s argument goes, the post-media situation is not a repetition of its failed predecessor (the post-medium condition); rather it symptomizes the problems, simulated and understood by post-media``s dialectical turn. To this end, this argument will prove that Krauss``s duality is not a blind dead-end of hercritical endeavor, but an insight through which one can see the true face of contemporary media/medium art
      번역하기

      This essay aims to clarify the duality of (Rosalind) Krauss`` Post-Medium condition, and therein, questions how this duality works in our efforts to bring together both the post-medium art and the post-media art. The duality here derives from Krauss``...

      This essay aims to clarify the duality of (Rosalind) Krauss`` Post-Medium condition, and therein, questions how this duality works in our efforts to bring together both the post-medium art and the post-media art. The duality here derives from Krauss`` contradictory claims in her recent theories: Krauss taught us, back in 80s, the collapse of specificity in the postmodern era was ‘an expansion,’ while she’s now changed this thought, considering the same event as “a monstrous myth.” The duality also comes from the paradox that even though Krauss discredits installation (as non-art, kitch, etc.), most artists in her “crusades” against ‘the monstrous myth’ somehow involve installation, embracing media technologies. Arguably however this duality illuminates the crisis of contemporary art that fails to maintain its specifity in the cult of digital generality. As Krauss would agree, this anti-specificity in recent digital arts appears to be a repeation of the post-medium conditions whose origin can be found in the Duchampian ‘disgust’ on aesthetic traditions. Today we live on this contradiction as this paper attempts to explain and understand it. Peter Burger``s 『heory of Avant-Garde』 and Hal Foster``s 『 Who is afraid of Neo Avant-garde?』will be reviewed in that for both, the repetition and contradiction in history was a central issue. As Foster`s argument goes, the post-media situation is not a repetition of its failed predecessor (the post-medium condition); rather it symptomizes the problems, simulated and understood by post-media``s dialectical turn. To this end, this argument will prove that Krauss``s duality is not a blind dead-end of hercritical endeavor, but an insight through which one can see the true face of contemporary media/medium art

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 페터 뷔르거, "전위예술의 새로운 이해" 심설당 1986

      2 할 포스터, "실재의 귀환" 경성대학교 출판부 2003

      3 발터 벤야민, "발터 벤야민의 문예 이론" 민음사 1983

      4 T. W. 아도르노, "미학 이론" 문학과 지성사 1984

      5 Krauss, Rosalind, "Under Blue Cup" The MIT Press 2011

      6 Krauss, Rosalind, "Two Moments from the Post-Medium Condition" 116 (116): 55-62, 2006

      7 Buchloh, Benjamin, "Theorizing the Avant-Garde" 72 : 19-21, 1984

      8 Stanley Cavell, "The World Viewed" Cambridge University Press 1979

      9 Krauss, Rosalind, "The Status of Contemporary Art Criticism: A Conversation with Rosalind Krauss"

      10 Buchloh, Benjamin, "The Primary Color for the Second Time: A Paradigm Repetition of the Neo-Avant-Grade" 37 (37): 41-53, 1986

      1 페터 뷔르거, "전위예술의 새로운 이해" 심설당 1986

      2 할 포스터, "실재의 귀환" 경성대학교 출판부 2003

      3 발터 벤야민, "발터 벤야민의 문예 이론" 민음사 1983

      4 T. W. 아도르노, "미학 이론" 문학과 지성사 1984

      5 Krauss, Rosalind, "Under Blue Cup" The MIT Press 2011

      6 Krauss, Rosalind, "Two Moments from the Post-Medium Condition" 116 (116): 55-62, 2006

      7 Buchloh, Benjamin, "Theorizing the Avant-Garde" 72 : 19-21, 1984

      8 Stanley Cavell, "The World Viewed" Cambridge University Press 1979

      9 Krauss, Rosalind, "The Status of Contemporary Art Criticism: A Conversation with Rosalind Krauss"

      10 Buchloh, Benjamin, "The Primary Color for the Second Time: A Paradigm Repetition of the Neo-Avant-Grade" 37 (37): 41-53, 1986

      11 Manovich, Lev, "The Practice of Everyday (Media) Life: From Mass Consumption to Mass Cultural Production" 35 (35): 319-331, 2009

      12 Weibel, Peter, "The Postmedia Condition"

      13 Krauss, Rosalind, "The Picasso Paper" The MIT Press 1999

      14 Nancy, Jean-Luc, "The Muse" Stanford University Press 1-40, 1994

      15 Krauss, Rosalind, "The Anti-Aesthetic" the New Press 35-48, 1998

      16 Shanken, Edward A., "Telematic Embrace: A Love Story? Roy Ascott's Theories of Telematic Art"

      17 Bourriaud, Nicolas, "Relational Aesthetics" Les Presse Du Reel 1998

      18 Krauss, Rosalind, "Reinventing the Medium" 25 (25): 289-305, 1999

      19 Bourriaud, Nicolas, "Postproduction - Culture as Screenplay: How Art Reprograms The World" Lukas& Sternberg 2002

      20 Manovich, Lev, "Post-media Aesthetics"

      21 Crimp, Douglas, "Pictures" 8 (8): 75-88, 1979

      22 Krauss, Rosalind, "Perpetual inventory" The MIT Press 2010

      23 Fried, Michael, "Minimal Art Critical Anthology" Dutton 116-147, 1968

      24 Greenberg, Clement, "Late Writings" University of Minnesota Press 2003

      25 Duchamp, Marcel, "Dialogs with Marcel Duchamp" Thames&Hudson 1971

      26 Tzara, Tristan, "Dada Manifesto"

      27 LeWitt, Sol, "Conceptual Art: a critical anthology" the MIT Press 106-109, 1999

      28 Lippard, Lucy R., "Conceptual Art: a critical anthology" the MIT Press 46-51, 1999

      29 Kosuth, Joseph, "Conceptual Art: a critical anthology" the MIT Press 158-177, 1999

      30 Buchloh, Benjamin, "Conceptual Art: a critical anthology" the MIT Press 514-537, 1999

      31 Editors of Art-Language, "Conceptual Art: a critical anthology" the MIT Press 98-104, 1999

      32 LeWitt, Sol, "Conceptual Art: a critical anthology" the MIT Press 12-16, 1999

      33 Krauss, Rosalind, "Art after Modernism" The New Museum of Contemporary Art 13-29, 1984

      34 Joselit, David, "After Art" Princeton University Press 2013

      35 Krauss, Rosalind, "A Voyage on the North Sea, Art in the Age of the Post-Medium Condition" Themes & Hudson 1999

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.5 1.082 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼